LowEndBox

Hosting Websites on Bare Minimum VPS/Dedicated Servers

URPad – $5.99/Month, 1024MB OpenVZ VPS in Dallas, TX

Tags: , , Date/Time: February 17, 2012 @ 2:45 pm, by Chief

URPadChris from URPad has sent in an offer at $5.99/Month for a 1GB OpenVZ VPS located in Dallas, Texas.

LEB Offer: Budget Linux VPS

  • 1024MB Ram
  • 1536MB Burst Ram
  • 40GB HDD
  • 500GB Bandwidth
  • 100Mbps Port
  • 1 IPv4 Address
  • SolusVM/OpenVZ
  • $5.99/Month, Direct Signup (Instant Setup!)

URPad states this is a “Guaranteed Lifetime Price Lock,” meaning there will never be an increase on the plan price once ordered. There’s also two other standard plans URPad offers that are “LEB” on this page.

URPad’s nodes are located within the Limestone Networks datacenter.
Test IP: 64.31.0.187
Test File (100MB): http://64.31.0.187/test100.zip

143 Comments

  1. Wahab:

    I have been using one of their other VPS plans for a month now and have no issues to date.

    I just ordered this one because its too good of a deal to miss. Got it instantly and live chat was friendly to assist me on some questions. Recommended!

    Will play more with the VPS tomorrow, but it seems very responsive to SSH commands as of now!

    February 17, 2012 @ 4:29 pm | Reply
    • Hi Wahab,

      Thank you for your kind words, we value your trust and business.

      Let us know if you need anything!

      Best,
      Kevin

      February 17, 2012 @ 4:57 pm | Reply
      • Wahab:

        You r welcome Kevin.. thanks for your kind assistance!! I have a friend wanting to order one but he has no internet access now, can you tell me when does the stock for this offer expire?

        February 17, 2012 @ 5:07 pm | Reply
        • This offer is available while stock lasts. Judging from the recent sales I can tell you right now that it will likely sell out quickly.

          Best,
          Kevin

          February 17, 2012 @ 5:11 pm | Reply
  2. Via the reply to me from wht, this offer is available for kansas and seatle dc as well.

    February 17, 2012 @ 4:43 pm | Reply
  3. Gold:

    1GB ram for 6$/month. How it’s possible to not oversell?

    February 17, 2012 @ 4:45 pm | Reply
    • There is a difference between oversubscribing and overloading. 95% of hosting companies likely oversubscribe their servers in order to take advantage of available resources.

      The difference is that we actually have technicians onsite 24/7 morning, day, and night (don’t hesitate to test us, email support[at]urpad[dot]net) and we monitor our servers 24/7. We have the proper monitoring channels installed in order to ensure stability across all of our infrastructure.

      At the end of the day we can move/upgrade accounts pretty easily if something becomes an issue, however I can assure you we have never kicked a client out for using most or all of their resources in a legitimate manner. You will NOT have a problem utilizing all of the advertised resources in a manner in a legitimate manner.

      Best,
      Kevin

      February 17, 2012 @ 10:45 pm | Reply
    • MrJ:

      They do oversell and overload, it shows as huge disk hogs which they didn’t fix while I was a client, despite my requests. Although I was on another location, I wouldn’t trust this offer any more than the others.

      April 10, 2012 @ 6:13 am | Reply
  4. Hi Vmvps,

    I have just updated the WHT thread, unfortunately we sold out on the Seattle & Kansas City locations for this special offer and it’s only available for Dallas, TX at the present time.

    We will update our order form with multiple location choices if either location opens up or has free room.

    To confirm it is instant setup in Dallas, TX and available for order immediately, we are simply sold out on Kansas City & Seattle and Dallas is available.

    Best,
    Kevin

    February 17, 2012 @ 4:56 pm | Reply
  5. Hello,

    Thank you for listing us Chief and team. We appreciate the opportunity to extend our offers to the fans of LowEndBox.

    If anyone has any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    Thanks,
    Chris Miller
    Telephone: +1(888) 743-8814
    Twitter: http://twitter.com/URPad
    Interact with us at our blog! http://www.urpad.net/blog/

    February 17, 2012 @ 6:28 pm | Reply
  6. Roph:
    February 17, 2012 @ 8:14 pm | Reply
  7. Bob Freemer:

    I’ve used urpad for the past several months and they’ve been very responsive and good to work with.

    But just found my outgoing port 25 blocked on my exim server and discovered they have some IPs listed on spamhaus.

    Probably they were hit by a spammer but a blanket shutdown of everyone in the datacenter seems a bit inappropriate and pretty damn disruptive.

    February 17, 2012 @ 9:38 pm | Reply
    • Sorry Bob, you are on our Kansas City facility. Our Kansas City upstream provider appears to be blocked in Spamhaus due with a misunderstanding. I sincerely apologize for the inconvenience caused.

      We expect this to be resolved shortly as we are in touch with Spamhaus, they are cooperating with us however they are slow to respond. If this is something urgent, we can migrate you to one of our Seattle, WA or Dallas, TX server nodes but if you can spare to wait a couple days you can stay in your existing location (Kansas City) and it should be resolved by then.

      I feel extremely terrible about this, we usually are not like this and we usually never have issues like this, so please let me know if you would like to relocate to one of our Dallas or Seattle nodes, I am confident we can sort this out with you. My direct email is kevin[at]ftnhosting[dot]net please contact me directly and I will work with you.

      Best,
      Kevin

      February 17, 2012 @ 10:21 pm | Reply
      • Hello Bob-

        Just an update, good news your issue is resolved now. The issue has been cleared up with Spamhaus and all Kansas City nodes are all good now. Port 25 is now unblocked and mails should be going through properly at this time.

        Regards, Ethan

        February 19, 2012 @ 5:00 am | Reply
    • Hello,

      To confirm, Bob’s issue doesn’t affect this offer as his issue is only affecting Kansas City nodes temporarily, this specific offer is in our Dallas, TX facilities.

      Thanks,
      Chris.M

      February 17, 2012 @ 10:57 pm | Reply
  8. Wahab:

    I had some time to play with my new VPS more this morning and I`m pleased to report no issues. Very quick to respond to commands and installs applications quickly.

    I have installed VNC with the gnome interface and its very quick, compared to my other vps with BurstNet. Cheers!

    February 18, 2012 @ 2:13 am | Reply
    • Hello Wahab-

      I’m happy to see that you are satisfied and have no issues to report. We will continue to provide superior service. Don’t hesitate to contact us should you need any help.

      Regards, Ethan

      February 19, 2012 @ 4:32 am | Reply
  9. rych:

    Hi, can i run a private 3 person mine craft on the vps?

    February 18, 2012 @ 9:32 am | Reply
    • We do not allow Minecraft on our services.

      Best,
      Kevin

      February 18, 2012 @ 6:48 pm | Reply
      • hi kevin.

        im parts of a community of gamers. can we host a game server like cod4 and teamspeak server.?

        February 18, 2012 @ 7:21 pm | Reply
        • Teamspeak should be fine however we cannot allow Cod4. I appreciate your time!

          Best,
          Kevin

          February 19, 2012 @ 12:21 am | Reply
  10. Just signed up. Checking this guys out, so far so good but I’ll give my final say next month.

    February 18, 2012 @ 5:35 pm | Reply
    • Welcome aboard! Glad to have you with us.

      February 19, 2012 @ 12:22 am | Reply
      • Glad to be aboard! Just completely setup my server and hosting one of my sites to test, so far so good!

        February 19, 2012 @ 3:03 am | Reply
        • Hello Azizmb-

          I am happy to hear that you are pleased with the performance of our servers. Please keep LEB updated.

          Don’t hesitate to contact us should you require any assistance.

          Regards, Ethan

          February 19, 2012 @ 3:14 am | Reply
  11. pubcrawler:

    Speedtest files are entirely too slow.

    I even went and tried Limestone’s own speed test files. SLOW!

    Not from everywhere though. FDCServers Denver location was quite fast to this speedtest/Limestone – 46.8 MB/s

    Tested from colo in Dallas = 2.1M/S

    From server in Kansas City = 334K

    Other tests were < 3 M/s

    February 18, 2012 @ 6:22 pm | Reply
    • I am having trouble believing your statements, can you validate that you are actually a client?

      Here is a speed test result I am getting:

      # wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test -O /dev/null
      –2012-02-18 12:45:41– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
      Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
      Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
      HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
      Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
      Saving to: `/dev/null’

      100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 10.4M/s in 10s

      2012-02-18 12:45:51 (10.0 MB/s) – `/dev/null’ saved [104857600/104857600]

      February 18, 2012 @ 6:47 pm | Reply
      • Ragil:

        Here is my result :

        wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test -O /dev/null
        –2012-02-18 21:58:23– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
        Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
        Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
        HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
        Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
        Saving to: `/dev/null’

        100%[=======================================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 11.0M/s in 9.7s

        2012-02-18 21:58:33 (10.3 MB/s) – `/dev/null’ saved [104857600/104857600]

        February 18, 2012 @ 7:02 pm | Reply
      • Roph:

        I think he likely means the speed out of the VPS, not inbound.

        February 19, 2012 @ 12:15 am | Reply
        • Hi,

          Still awaiting validation that he is an actual client as my performance tests prove otherwise and we never received complaints from other clients, until then his statements are not valid.

          Best,
          Kevin

          February 19, 2012 @ 12:23 am | Reply
  12. pubcrawler:

    No, I am not a client, not yet.

    These are tests from other networks.

    This is from Kansas City, MO, on a gigabit connection:
    wgetnull http://64.31.0.187/test100.zip
    –2012-02-18 16:38:47– http://64.31.0.187/test100.zip
    Connecting to 64.31.0.187:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 301 Moved Permanently
    Location: http://www.limestonenetworks.com/test100.zip [following]
    –2012-02-18 16:38:47– http://www.limestonenetworks.com/test100.zip
    Resolving http://www.limestonenetworks.com... 64.31.0.187
    Reusing existing connection to 64.31.0.187:80.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/zip]
    Saving to: `/dev/null’

    10% [====================> ] 11,327,343 238K/s eta 4m 48s

    Traceroute:
    6 10gigabitethernet6-1.core1.chi1.he.net (72.52.92.1) 19.510 ms 19.464 ms 19.483 ms
    7 mpr1.ord7.us (206.223.119.86) 11.096 ms 11.039 ms 11.000 ms
    8 xe-2-2-0.cr1.ord2.us.above.net (64.125.26.249) 11.241 ms 11.218 ms 11.244 ms
    9 xe-2-0-0.cr1.dfw2.us.above.net (64.125.25.134) 25.260 ms 25.252 ms 25.214 ms
    10 xe-0-1-0.mpr1.dfw1.us.above.net (64.125.27.209) 24.868 ms 25.006 ms 24.965 ms
    11 64.125.188.182.t00822-03.above.net (64.125.188.182) 26.109 ms 26.169 ms 26.266 ms
    12 te6-1.bdr2.core1.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (208.115.192.58) 26.203 ms 26.387 ms te6-1.bdr2.core2.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (208.115.192.62) 25.936 ms
    13 ae1-0.core2.r92-2.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (64.31.0.254) 33.288 ms 34.202 ms ae0-0.core1.r92-2.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (64.31.0.250) 32.657 ms
    14 http://www.limestonenetworks.com (64.31.0.187) 25.917 ms 25.959 ms 25.953 ms

    This is from Scranton, Pennsylvania:
    wget -O /dev/null http://64.31.0.187/test100.zip
    –2012-02-18 17:41:40– http://64.31.0.187/test100.zip
    Connecting to 64.31.0.187:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 301 Moved Permanently
    Location: http://www.limestonenetworks.com/test100.zip [following]
    –2012-02-18 17:41:41– http://www.limestonenetworks.com/test100.zip
    Resolving http://www.limestonenetworks.com... 64.31.0.187
    Reusing existing connection to 64.31.0.187:80.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/zip]
    Saving to: `/dev/null’

    100%[==========================================================================>] 104,857,600 513K/s in 1m 43s

    This is from Dallas, Texas, 100Mbps connection:
    wget -O /dev/null http://64.31.0.187/test100.zip
    –2012-02-18 16:45:52– http://64.31.0.187/test100.zip
    Connecting to 64.31.0.187:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 301 Moved Permanently
    Location: http://www.limestonenetworks.com/test100.zip [following]
    –2012-02-18 16:45:52– http://www.limestonenetworks.com/test100.zip
    Resolving http://www.limestonenetworks.com... 64.31.0.187
    Reusing existing connection to 64.31.0.187:80.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/zip]
    Saving to: `/dev/null’

    100%[==========================================================================>] 104,857,600 2.18M/s in 46s

    traceroute:
    3 xe-0-1-2.er3.dfw2.us.above.net (64.124.193.219) 3.824 ms 0.789 ms 1.354 ms
    4 xe-1-3-0.cr2.dfw2.us.above.net (64.125.31.85) 1.817 ms 2.273 ms 2.726 ms
    5 xe-0-2-0.mpr1.dfw1.us.above.net (64.125.27.213) 3.178 ms 3.631 ms 4.085 ms
    6 64.125.188.182.t00822-03.above.net (64.125.188.182) 1.558 ms 1.544 ms 2.130 ms
    7 te6-1.bdr2.core2.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (208.115.192.62) 2.607 ms 3.663 ms te6-1.bdr2.core1.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (208.115.192.58) 3.036 ms
    8 ae1-0.core2.r92-2.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (64.31.0.254) 8.653 ms 9.126 ms 9.585 ms
    9 http://www.limestonenetworks.com (64.31.0.187) 3.787 ms 4.239 ms 4.692 ms

    I can send some more… Clearly the network is either A) Slow or B) Limiting speed tests

    traceroute:
    4 209.197.17.133 (209.197.17.133) 23.085 ms 52.691 ms 52.761 ms
    5 209.197.17.129 (209.197.17.129) 37.020 ms 37.076 ms 37.119 ms
    6 209.220.16.205.ptr.us.xo.net (209.220.16.205) 33.145 ms 32.464 ms 32.430 ms
    7 207.88.14.185.ptr.us.xo.net (207.88.14.185) 45.831 ms 41.636 ms 35.649 ms
    8 vb6.rar3.chicago-il.us.xo.net (207.88.12.33) 56.527 ms 56.315 ms 56.314 ms
    9 207.88.14.10.ptr.us.xo.net (207.88.14.10) 73.700 ms 95.334 ms 85.147 ms
    10 207.88.185.74.ptr.us.xo.net (207.88.185.74) 64.259 ms 64.266 ms 71.718 ms
    11 border1.pc2-bbnet2.dal004.pnap.net (216.52.191.81) 71.796 ms border1.pc1-bbnet1.dal004.pnap.net (216.52.191.19) 72.350 ms 73.934 ms
    12 leasenet-2.border1.dal004.pnap.net (216.52.189.34) 70.143 ms 69.842 ms 69.551 ms
    13 te6-1.bdr2.core1.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (208.115.192.58) 75.459 ms te6-1.bdr2.core2.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (208.115.192.62) 72.236 ms te6-1.bdr2.core1.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (208.115.192.58) 71.589 ms
    14 ae0-0.core1.r92-2.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (64.31.0.250) 75.944 ms 70.583 ms ae1-0.core2.r92-2.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (64.31.0.254) 72.812 ms
    15 http://www.limestonenetworks.com (64.31.0.187) 68.776 ms 70.248 ms 70.223 ms

    February 18, 2012 @ 10:48 pm | Reply
    • Hello-

      The test files posted were Limestone Networks’ test files they provide, its possible their website is busy or throttling speed test downloads. Please try this which is a test file we directly host on one of our servers with them.

      Test IP: 63.143.39.34
      Test File (100MB): http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test

      Here’s a snippet of the download from one of our servers with 1102GRAND.com in Kansas City:

      ]# wget http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
      --2012-02-18 22:26:31--  http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
      Connecting to 63.143.39.34:80... connected.
      HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
      Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
      Saving to: `100mb.test'
      
      100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 11.1M/s   in 10s     
      
      2012-02-18 22:26:41 (9.54 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]

      Can you please try with the above test file I provided as that is a test file hosted on one of our nodes with Limestone rather than the test file they provide, looking forward to your results and update. Thank you.

      Regards, Ethan

      February 19, 2012 @ 4:28 am | Reply
      • Roph:

        I’m getting about 220 kB/s off that test file here. I have 30mbit/s cable.

        February 19, 2012 @ 11:49 pm | Reply
        • I’m getting 4.6 mB/s off that download at my work office and my work has a ~50Mbit connection (around 5mB/s max) shared with all my colleagues

          not bad. I also experience no lag when using my VPS with URpad.

          February 21, 2012 @ 1:40 am | Reply
  13. Amfy:

    104.857.600 7,05M/s in 33s

    From Germany, nice.

    February 19, 2012 @ 12:24 am | Reply
  14. larry:

    option for 1gbps port? does the node have hyperthreading? what is the node specs? are these sas 15k drives? do you provide free trials? ipv6 work? can we change ips after 2 months without having to pay? is cpu shared or dedicated and how much? is bandwidth bgp mesh or? backups enabled? free first month mangement? can you price match? how old is machine we are going on?

    ARE YOU ALSO FUSEVPS.COM? QUICK RESEARCH SHOWS THIS http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1111544

    CAN I TRUST YOU? EXPLAIN ME THIS!

    February 19, 2012 @ 5:20 am | Reply
    • Hi Larry,

      - By default our Linux VPS are 100Mbps. We can offer 1Gbps port upgrade for $30/m additional, please contact our sales team if you wish to proceed with this upgrade.
      - Yes, our CPUs support hyperthreading
      - We do not utilize SAS Drives
      - Why would you want to change IPs..? Are you a spammer?
      - The CPU is shared.
      - We can enable quick backup for you in SolusVM upon request.
      - These VPS’s are unmanaged.
      - Shoot sales[at]urpad[dot]net an email with the offer you would like us to pricematch and we will see what we can make happen.

      Regarding FuseVPS we have no affiliation with them, in fact this is the first time I heard about them. It appears they use the same datacenter as us (Limestone Networks), they have similar test IP/file to us because those are the files provided by Limestone: http://www.limestonenetworks.com/datacenter/speedtest.html

      Just because they use the same datacenter as us doesn’t mean they are us… that is just like saying Yahoo and MSN are the same owners because they are both search engines…

      Best,
      Kevin

      February 19, 2012 @ 6:23 am | Reply
  15. dd if=/dev/zero of=virtualpartition bs=1M count=10k
    10240+0 records in
    10240+0 records out
    10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 54.4087 seconds, 197 MB/s

    quick respond. Thanks Kevin.

    February 19, 2012 @ 12:25 pm | Reply
  16. pubcrawler:

    Let’s see…

    Dallas:
    wget -O /dev/null http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    –2012-02-19 08:03:23– http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    Connecting to 63.143.39.34:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: `/dev/null’

    100%[==================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 1.45M/s in 78s

    wget -O /dev/null http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    –2012-02-19 08:07:31– http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    Connecting to 63.143.39.34:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: `/dev/null’

    100%[==========================>] 104,857,600 3.28M/s in 30s

    —-

    Scranton, Pennsylvania

    wget -O /dev/null http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    –2012-02-19 09:08:49– http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    Connecting to 63.143.39.34:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: `/dev/null’

    8% [=======> ] 8,697,456 179K/s eta 5m 22s

    —–

    Chicago

    wget -O /dev/null http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    –2012-02-19 08:09:48– http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    Connecting to 63.143.39.34:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: “/dev/null”

    100%[==================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 9.53M/s in 11s

    ———

    Denver

    wget -O /dev/null http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    –2012-02-19 07:10:37– http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    Connecting to 63.143.39.34:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: “/dev/null”

    100%[==================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 9.79M/s in 10s

    ——

    Atlanta

    wget -O /dev/null http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    –2012-02-19 09:11:03– http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    Connecting to 63.143.39.34:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: “/dev/null”

    100%[==================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 9.64M/s in 12s

    —–

    Portland

    wget -O /dev/null http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    –2012-02-19 06:11:56– http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    Connecting to 63.143.39.34:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: “/dev/null”

    100%[==================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 9.98M/s in 11s

    ——

    Germany

    wget -O /dev/null http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    –2012-02-19 15:16:06– http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    Connecting to 63.143.39.34:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: “/dev/null”

    100%[==================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 9.75M/s in 12s

    Looking better… Far from perfect though and it is Sunday morning afterall.

    February 19, 2012 @ 2:14 pm | Reply
    • Wahab:

      hrmm… for the most part those look nice!

      It must be on the remote server you are downloading on that is being overloaded or having issues because I downloaded the test file from my Burstnet (which is Scranton, Pennsylvania) server and got over 9MB/s which is very good result. Stop blaming Urpad when you even told us you are not even a customer :D I`m having this VPS and another one with Urpad for some time now and never had speed issues.. and whenever I had querys support was vry fast to help.. cheers…!

      February 19, 2012 @ 7:19 pm | Reply
  17. pubcrawler.com:

    Now, now…

    At least this offer is on a different network. Price isn’t bad either.

    Network though is suspect. Sure it works, but peering and/or upstream connectivity does have something less than optimal going on.

    Funny thing is, the facility’s own speed test files are really slow and that’s what was originally posted. Odd to have a facility performing so poorly on test files that everyone know folks test first and are a big part of the decision process.

    Maybe providers will start posting their own download files and stop the facility’s own speed tests.

    I’d love to support every provider with my business. Clearly, due diligence requires network tests, traceroutes, speed tests, etc. No one should be upset with the results.

    February 19, 2012 @ 9:48 pm | Reply
    • Hello-

      It’s possible other people were downloading Limestone’s speed test file the same time you were, they are a pretty popular provider. I agree with you that we shouldn’t have provided Limestone’s test IP/file, however in my above comment, I have already provided LEB with test IP/files hosted on our servers under our control directly. Maybe an administrator of the website can update the article to include this information:

      Test IP: 63.143.39.34
      Test File (100MB): http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test

      Regards, Ethan

      February 19, 2012 @ 10:22 pm | Reply
  18. pubcrawler:

    Servers we are testing from aren’t overloaded :)

    This is from Kansas City (gig speed connection):

    wget -O /dev/null http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    –2012-02-19 15:47:01– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
    Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: `/dev/null’

    100%[==========================>] 104,857,600 52.6M/s in 1.9s

    compared to the provided speed test:
    wget -O /dev/null http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    –2012-02-19 15:50:32– http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    Connecting to 63.143.39.34:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: `/dev/null’

    100%[==========================>] 104,857,600 11.1M/s in 9.3s

    Yep, your speed test is working fine now…

    February 19, 2012 @ 9:54 pm | Reply
    • Hello-

      Our servers are 100Mbps, no where did we advertise 1Gbit and we wouldn’t provide 1Gbit for $5.99/month that is completely unsustainable.

      The result you posted is very good (11.1MB/s) that is nearly maxing out the 100Mbps port.

      Regards, Ethan

      February 19, 2012 @ 10:24 pm | Reply
  19. Looks like a promising offer. I just suspect a little overselling through.

    February 20, 2012 @ 5:26 am | Reply
  20. Bui:

    Is IRC allowed on these servers?

    February 20, 2012 @ 5:02 pm | Reply
  21. This VPS is pretty freakin sweet. Nice and fast. Quick speeds from my work office and home.

    February 21, 2012 @ 12:42 am | Reply
  22. Tadej Magajna:

    I bought it about a week ago and so far it looks very good.

    I recommend.

    February 23, 2012 @ 12:08 pm | Reply
  23. Wahab:

    Just some update, I ordered another VPS for my friend today and got everything instantly. Thanks urpad for the continued great service.

    February 24, 2012 @ 4:07 pm | Reply
    • Thank you for the update, glad to hear we are working out well for you.

      Best,
      Kevin

      February 27, 2012 @ 5:32 am | Reply
      • john:

        I just ordered one and you gave me a spammer’s black listed i.p

        February 27, 2012 @ 5:39 am | Reply
        • And how can LEB help you with this issue? Not sure what you expect the community to do as we are the only ones with access to our servers.

          Submit a support ticket.

          For the record, just to clear up our reputation, I have looked up the latest order from “John” and looked up his IP in dnsbl.info and all shows GREEN with OK status, check this screenshot. http://i.imgur.com/eYtqE.png

          Best,
          Kevin

          February 27, 2012 @ 5:59 am | Reply
        • john:

          I am sorry, it’s my fault.

          February 27, 2012 @ 6:51 am | Reply
  24. John_R:

    Just signed up, looks good so far.

    Is there a Debian 6.0 minimal image?

    The VPS came with services installed, the only service I want is ssh. Virtualmin will handle the rest.

    February 27, 2012 @ 2:36 pm | Reply
    • Hi! Welcome aboard!

      Yep we can add Debian 6.0 Minimal for you, send a ticket in :)

      Best,
      Kevin

      February 27, 2012 @ 9:18 pm | Reply
  25. jbarbieri:

    From my VPS in Jacksonville, FL:

    wget http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    –2012-02-27 23:53:26– http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    Connecting to 63.143.39.34:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: `100mb.test’

    100%[=============================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 9.09M/s in 12s

    2012-02-27 23:53:37 (8.51 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

    From my home in New Hampshire (cable):

    wget http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    –2012-02-27 18:53:52– http://63.143.39.34/100mb.test
    Connecting to 63.143.39.34:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: `100mb.test’

    100%[==============================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 1.33M/s in 77s

    2012-02-27 18:55:09 (1.30 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

    So not to bad!

    February 27, 2012 @ 11:56 pm | Reply
  26. arkhali:

    Can I use this to host Tor anonymous service?

    February 28, 2012 @ 11:14 am | Reply
    • That shouldn’t be a problem.

      February 28, 2012 @ 5:35 pm | Reply
      • Manfre:

        URPad doesn’t classify Tor under “Proxy Scripts / Anonymizers”? Does that include Tor exit points?

        February 29, 2012 @ 12:40 am | Reply
        • I apologize for the confusion caused, please allow me to confirm this with Ethan or one of our other technicians so we can give you an accurate answer. I appreciate your time and interest.

          Best,
          Kevin

          February 29, 2012 @ 8:12 am | Reply
  27. Can anyone here guess what NEW location we’re opening up this special in later today?

    Best,
    Kevin

    February 28, 2012 @ 5:35 pm | Reply
    • Wahab:

      May be Europe or Asia?

      February 28, 2012 @ 8:22 pm | Reply
      • You’re pretty close.

        We’ll be announcing it once we’re ready to accept orders in this location later today.

        Best,
        Kevin

        February 28, 2012 @ 8:51 pm | Reply
  28. Dinh:

    Are there any more dallas nodes?

    February 28, 2012 @ 10:26 pm | Reply
    • Not at this time, we’re 100% sold out on all locations but LA right now as we’ve been focusing on getting our new Los Angeles location up recently.

      We have quite a few servers online in Los Angeles and its available for order immediately. This is also only available while stock lasts. Thank you for considering URPad.net!

      Best,
      Kevin

      February 29, 2012 @ 3:14 am | Reply
  29. URPad.net expands to Los Angeles, CA in partnership with QuadraNET.com!

    This hot special is now available in our newest and latest expansion: Los Angeles, CA

    Are you from Asia? Clients from Asia? Are you or your target audience in or near the northwest? This is the perfect location for you regardless of where you are, QuadraNET is directly connected to One Wilshire in Los Angeles (premium network) with excellent Asian routing.

    Test IP: 173.254.233.2
    Test File: http://173.254.233.2/100mb.test

    Order now! https://billing.urpad.net/cart.php?a=add&pid=117

    URPad is the first and only reputable provider offering Los Angeles VPS at affordable rates without compromising quality, we’re very much looking forward to this expansion and we will never forget this wouldn’t be possible without you – our valued clients. Thank you very much for your trust.

    February 29, 2012 @ 3:12 am | Reply
  30. Dony:

    Do URPad.net accept paypal for payment?

    February 29, 2012 @ 11:00 am | Reply
  31. We have added a very limited amount of stock in Kansas City, MO for this offer, however it is very limited and will not last long.

    At the present time this is available in both Kansas City and Los Angeles, your desired location may be chosen in the order form: https://billing.urpad.net/cart.php?a=add&pid=117

    We will update LEB if more stock opens up in Dallas or Seattle.

    Best,
    Kevin

    March 2, 2012 @ 2:19 am | Reply
  32. Reginald:

    Purchased one in La, awesome speeds!

    March 4, 2012 @ 10:50 pm | Reply
  33. Rain:

    UrPad VPS speeds are awesome. :)

    March 5, 2012 @ 5:50 pm | Reply
  34. This offer is now available in our latest & newest expansion: Europe (Steinsel, Luxembourg)

    You now have the ability to order this in your desired location (Los Angeles/Kansas City/Luxembourg) in the ordering form https://billing.urpad.net/cart.php?a=add&pid=117

    Test IP/file for Luxembourg:
    IP: 94.242.219.2
    Test File (100MB): http://94.242.219.2/100mb.test

    Give us a ring @ 1-888-743-8814 or email us sales@urpad.net if you have any questions.

    Best,
    Kevin

    March 7, 2012 @ 11:02 pm | Reply
  35. Shiv Dave:

    Good speed in LA

    March 9, 2012 @ 1:56 pm | Reply
  36. Hi Ray,

    Yep – we sold LA VPS quickly and filled up all the servers we had! Waiting for more servers to ship to QuadraNET’s DC before we can refill our stock for Los Angeles VPS.

    Right now this offer is only available for Luxembourg and all other locations are sold out, will update here when other locations may be in stock.

    Best,
    Kevin

    March 11, 2012 @ 2:40 am | Reply
  37. For a while now we only had this offer available in Luxembourg due with stock limitations. Stock for the following locations have been reclaimed and a -very- limited amount of stock is temporarily available in:

    - Dallas, TX
    - Kansas City, MO

    On top of this Luxembourg is also available. Location choice may be chosen in the order form.

    Order Link: https://billing.urpad.net/cart.php?a=add&pid=117

    Best,
    Kevin

    March 12, 2012 @ 7:00 pm | Reply
  38. John_R:

    Since you moved my VPS to Luxembourg, it has performed admirably.

    March 13, 2012 @ 12:43 am | Reply
    • Thanks John!

      Currently offering over 5 VPS locations, we are growing steadily and are taking suggestions for our next location expansion!

      P.S. Just an update, we only have less than 5 spots for this offer left in Dallas & Kansas City. After these spots are filled up only Luxembourg will be available for a while until our new servers arrive to the Los Angeles datacenter.

      Best,
      Kevin

      March 13, 2012 @ 1:40 am | Reply
  39. Announcement: New Stock in LA!

    A batch of new servers have finally arrived to QuadraNET’s Los Angeles datacenter today, so this offer is now available in Los Angeles.

    Order quickly before we run out again! At the present time, this particular offer is now available in Los Angeles, CA & Luxembourg, Europe. As always, the desired location may be selected in the ordering form.

    Order here: https://billing.urpad.net/cart.php?a=add&pid=117 (instant setup!)

    Thank you for choosing URPad.net! We appreciate your time, and value your trust and business.

    Best,
    Kevin

    March 15, 2012 @ 1:16 am | Reply
  40. tinyray:

    Kevin,

    I have just ordered one in LA. However, the CPU speed is not good, 950Mhz or so. I have many useless and cheap VPS servers having higher cpu speed than that. If this is what you provide with this plan then I would ask to cancel my purchase. I already submitted a ticket.

    Thanks,

    March 15, 2012 @ 5:41 pm | Reply
    • tinyray:
      CPU model:  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X3440  @ 2.53GHz
      Number of cores: 4
      CPU frequency:  950.031 MHz
      CPU cache size:  8192 KB
      Total amount of ram: 1536 MB
      Total amount of swap: 0 MB
      
      Current memory status (MB):
                   total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
      Mem:          1536         16       1519          0          0          0
      -/+ buffers/cache:         16       1519
      
      Download speed from CacheFly: 11.2MB/s 
      Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 2.72MB/s 
      Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 5.86MB/s 
      Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 5.39MB/s 
      Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 7.11MB/s 
      Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 3.27MB/s 
      Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 7.82MB/s 
      Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 9.15MB/s 
      Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 7.93MB/s 
      Download speed from OVHsystems, Roubaix, FR: 2.80MB/s 
      Download speed from Vinahost, Hanoi, VN: 2.89MB/s 
      
      March 15, 2012 @ 5:43 pm | Reply
      • Jack:

        Hi tinyray,

        Looking at this ^ Isn’t that 950MHz x 4 Cores? So 3.8GHz?

        March 15, 2012 @ 7:22 pm | Reply
        • Hi Ray,

          As Jack explained you receive 4 cores, so that is essentially 3.8 GHz, if this is not enough for you please send in a ticket to support with valid justification as to why you feel you need more allocation, we are flexible people to work with and would be willing to make adjustments depending on the situation :)

          Best,
          Kevin

          March 15, 2012 @ 7:53 pm | Reply
        • tinyray:

          Wow, this should be a very strange explanation to make me more confused. Just take a look at this post, easeVPS. and guess what? I have a very powerful computing resource at easeVPS, right?
          I am not sure what the visualization you are running on but the way you sum up the speed of independent cpu cores is what I ever know.

          March 15, 2012 @ 8:05 pm | Reply
        • Hi Ray,

          That’s because they do not cap your CPU utilization, we do this in effort to protect our nodes, for example an abuser taking down other VPS neighbors in the same server node, this is a common practice in the industry. Each company has different policies and each company runs things differently. I have interacted with Jacob a few times and he seems to be a decent individual however you must understand that we are NOT easevps we are URPad.

          You have to realize that you are receiving 4 CORES at 950 MHz each, which equals to 3800 MHz (3.8 GHz) which is MORE than enough for the average user.

          Never did we say we are not willing to unlimit this, it does depend on the situation, if you have a valid reason as to why you require more allocation as I said contact us via a support ticket, we are very flexible to work with.

          Best,
          Kevin

          March 15, 2012 @ 8:19 pm | Reply
        • Jack:

          Tinyray,

          processor       : 0
          vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
          cpu family      : 6
          model           : 42
          model name      :        Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
          stepping        : 7
          cpu MHz         : 3410.186
          cache size      : 8192 KB
          

          My EaseVPS , I guess urpad is giving you 4 Cores of what you can use fully?

          March 15, 2012 @ 8:20 pm | Reply
        • Hi Jack,

          So his easevps is one core at 3.40 GHz correct?

          If that is the case then he is still receiving more CPU allocation with us across 4 cores not sure why he is complaining.

          March 15, 2012 @ 8:29 pm | Reply
        • tinyray:

          Jack,
          Thank you for your concern.
          However, that depends on the plan, not sure yours and mine are the same.
          My issue is just not to get a vps for myself. I will send in a ticket and, hopefully not post back here because of any cancellation.

          March 15, 2012 @ 8:31 pm | Reply
        • I guess we must be the first provider you used Ray, that gave out 4 CPU cores equally. Most of our customers prefer this type of setup as everything is divided evenly and they receive full utilization of the 4 CPU Cores, but at the same time we are not strict on this like other companies, we are willing to work around your needs if you provide valid reasoning.

          I have just responded to your ticket, no further communication regarding this issue will be posted here as LEB is not our helpdesk, additionally I’m not sure what you’re expecting LEB to do for you as we are the only ones with access to our servers. Thanks!

          Best,
          Kevin

          March 15, 2012 @ 8:42 pm | Reply
        • Jack:

          No Kevin mine is 4 cores but i thought posting all 4 cores would post to large..

          March 15, 2012 @ 8:48 pm | Reply
        • Hi Jack,

          Okay, thanks for the update! We are in touch with the customer via our helpdesk and will definitely make it right with him. :)

          If anyone has questions please call us toll free 1-888-743-8814 or email sales!

          March 15, 2012 @ 8:50 pm | Reply
      • tinyray:

        Kevin, Thanks for your help!
        Regarding your above question, I absolutely expect LEB for nothing, I just learn from LEB. Don’t you see LEB becoming a good VPS information resource because of such posts, do you?
        Regarding your inquiry, yes, I did test all my VPSs for every k-core case, k=1,..,n to have solid results. I therefore concluded what I did send you, QED.
        I am very good at math :), I am just not sure why the 6-month basis payment is best for your stuff. Anyway, I am happy to know you. :)

        Thanks.

        March 15, 2012 @ 10:57 pm | Reply
  41. Jack:

    Back on topic,

    When i used urpad the server was speedy , only issue i had was I/O @ 38MB/s but i was told 30MB/s + was acceptable for budget VM’s.

    So I would recommend them.

    March 15, 2012 @ 8:50 pm | Reply
    • Thanks Jack, we have made improvements to our servers since you’ve used our service and our clients easily achieve over 80MB/s + now

      Here is the result from one of our busy/full nodes in Los Angeles

      # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
      16384+0 records in
      16384+0 records out
      1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 12.753 seconds, 84.2 MB/s
      March 15, 2012 @ 8:53 pm | Reply
    • tinyray:

      Thanks, Jack.
      Its good to have you in the community.

      March 15, 2012 @ 10:58 pm | Reply
  42. Ashley:

    rtd

    March 15, 2012 @ 9:50 pm | Reply
  43. tinyray:

    I’ve got my box just a couple of days, good CPU and IO (~70MB/s), and very fast network speed.
    Recommended!

    March 19, 2012 @ 4:34 am | Reply
    • Rob Davis:

      I would have to say I agree with you- My LA server with them has been fast, support is very courteous and friendly.

      Rob

      March 20, 2012 @ 4:45 am | Reply
    • Thank you for choosing URPad.net and we appreciate the kind words

      March 20, 2012 @ 6:31 pm | Reply
  44. Dan S:

    Just signed up and I must say I am enjoying the service so far. Kevin was very friendly and walked me through the order process, and answered my questions over the phone this morning. Got my VM container instant/auto setup right after I ordered .

    I wish I have found Urpad sooner. I’m hoping that I can order another one in another location tomorrow, am eager to try out the Europe one !! Thanks Urpad and Kevin for the help.

    Thanks
    Dan

    March 20, 2012 @ 5:16 pm | Reply
    • tinyray:

      I have not experienced downtime so far. If they can keep it up then this offer is just perfect!

      March 20, 2012 @ 6:09 pm | Reply
    • Thanks Dan, I remember speaking with you and its been a pleasure, if you need anything please be sure to let us know, we are available 24×7 via phone, email, and help desk! Additionally to answer your other question, yes you may order another one, there is no limit to how much you can order.

      Thanks for choosing URPad.net

      Best,
      Kevin

      March 20, 2012 @ 6:33 pm | Reply
  45. jaap:

    PPTP and tuntap enabled?

    March 23, 2012 @ 4:20 am | Reply
  46. Bob Freemer:

    I have had intermittent severe disk slowdowns since I signed up 4 months ago, and their Java serial console hasn’t ever worked. Had to submit 3 times to get rDNS set. Seems like technically they are not on top of it. I’ll be leaving urpad and would suggest you avoid them for now.

    March 27, 2012 @ 3:30 am | Reply
    • Hello Bob,

      I searched your name and came up with no resultes in our system or anything close to your name do you have a ticket ID for I can research your issue.

      Thanks,
      Chris

      March 27, 2012 @ 4:16 am | Reply
  47. Bob Freemer:

    Disk slow. Been like this intermittently the whole time:

    dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 107.417 s, 10.0 MB/s
    
    March 27, 2012 @ 3:31 am | Reply
    • tinyray:

      The IO of mine is at ~50MB/s, it sometimes goes up and down a little bit. Not sure if they will do some improvement. Otherwise, every thing is just fine, their network speed is extremely good, to eastbound and Asian countries, compared with other providers in CA.

      March 29, 2012 @ 4:12 am | Reply
  48. vksam:

    today signed up for this plan, speed is good
    waiting for the kloxo and firewall setup, then will install sites

    April 26, 2012 @ 4:57 am | Reply
    • if you are looking for West Coast hosting then this is one of the best offers so far; stable and fast, both cpu speed and network speed, particularly to Asian countries.

      April 26, 2012 @ 11:22 pm | Reply
      • vksam:

        got it all setup, up and running
        kevin installed firewall and hardened my server, thanks
        great so far !!

        April 27, 2012 @ 1:16 pm | Reply
  49. This offer is now available in our latest expansion & location: the famous New York City!

    This offer is available in 3 different locations:
    - Los Angeles, CA (US)
    - New York City, NY (US)
    - Luxembourg (Europe)

    You now have the ability to order this in your desired location in the ordering form here: https://billing.urpad.net/cart.php?a=add&pid=117

    Test IP for New York City: 107.6.84.202

    Here is a snippet of a Disk I/O test on 1 of our New York City servers:

    # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 6.35802 seconds, 169 MB/s

    May 3, 2012 @ 2:51 am | Reply
  50. Rob:

    I am a client of urpad.net and have VPS nodes in dallas, los angeles and newyork. Here is a brief overview of my opinions of this company.

    My first issue: I ordered my first vps in the dallas location. This server was SLOW as all get out. I requested the server to be moved to a different node in the dallas location via a support ticket. I was told I was being transferred blah blah blah and anyway after over 24 hours of waiting the issue got resolved. I will piggy back more on the support later.

    Second issue: I acquired a server in the newyork location and didn’t like the server or the specific location it was in. Wasn’t a day after I ordered I inquired about getting my VPS for this location refunded and credited towards my account. Kevin responded to me very bluntly and pretty much said I agreed to the terms and the terms say no refunds. Now this was after I was transferred from one department to another through their ticket system and after my horrendous wait to have my dallas node moved to a different server. I understand they can’t refund everyone that doesn’t like their vps’ but hey, I figured I have multiple VPS’ and they had a slow response with my last problem so they might cut me some slack. They didn’t.

    Thirdly is their support: They claim they have a 30 minute response time, which they do. Their 30 minute response time is this guy named Dylan that answers everyone of my tickets but never solves them or even answers them. What this guy does is transfers them to a different department, which can take hours and hours to get a response from. Their online chat is the EXACT same way, I attempted using this to gain support about relatively easy issues and was asked “are you a client” and when I said yes I was told to put in a ticket. I found myself lying and telling them no just to gain support.

    All in all I wish urpad was the right place for me. All I asked was for a measly $5.99 credited to my account for a server I wasn’t satisfied with and they couldn’t help me. Support is pretty horrid in my experience but I guess you get what you pay for pans out for this situation. I am still a client with urpad at this time.

    May 9, 2012 @ 6:10 pm | Reply
    • By the sounds of it, your not happy with our service, so why are you still with us? :) This puzzles me.

      You kept submitting sales/billing requests into the support department, which was why Dylan or another technician might of forwarded/transferred it to a different department. Why would we hire a tech just for forwarding tickets, your assumption makes absolutely no sense. Its because you submitted billing issues into the support department, which is extremely unprofessional and doesn’t allow us to streamline our work flow. Try submitting a ticket to support with an actual technical question, not a billing issue if you wish to test our techs… that’s what “Techs” are for.. “technical” support NOT “billing” support.

      Sounds like your unhappy with us because you failed to comprehend and read our TOS. Sorry it has to be this way, wishing you the best in the future.

      Best,
      Kevin

      May 13, 2012 @ 3:52 am | Reply
    • zar:

      Don’t fault a company for following their own Terms of Service. As for the support ticket response times, keep in mind these are LEBs. Anything less than 24 hours for a non urgent ticket (such as a VPS downtime) is perfectly fine.

      May 13, 2012 @ 4:49 am | Reply
  51. Curtis Gamez:

    Just ordered one in New York, its the closest location to me personally. Got the details in my email instantly after I ordered.

    Server performance seems to be very good, and Dennis from tech support was fast to enable some modules on my box. To be precise, they enabled the modules in 7 minutes after I sent in the ticket, not too shabby at all considering its about 2AM and a weekend.

    Keep up the good work Urpad.

    May 13, 2012 @ 6:19 am | Reply
  52. I agree with you there Curtis. Today, I have been with them for exactly 2 Months and I am still a very happy customer.

    Here is a quick run down

    Support: 10/10 (Phone support is very helpful, email/ticketing is also very fast and detailed)

    Server Performance/Speed: 9/10 (This would be 10/10 if they were 1Gbit, they have 100Mbit but its a $6 VPS so its reasonable enough)

    Sales Support: 10/10 (Kevin was very helpful when I called in for upgrade/addon questions)

    As long as this quality service continues and I remain happy, you have just gained a customer for life guys. Thanks!!!

    May 13, 2012 @ 4:51 pm | Reply
  53. Kelvin Foo:

    Kevin Hillstrand,

    I have cancelled my services for 2 months and consecutively 2 months you are invoicing me. What is going wrong~!! . Last month I thought probably an error and is just 5.99 so i couldnt be bothered. Now again!

    I demand for a 2 months fund. I have already printed screened my invoices as well as my cancelled vps.

    Please give me a reasonable explanation

    June 1, 2012 @ 6:04 pm | Reply
    • Yomero:

      LOL! Why you paid for no service that month? XDDDDD

      June 1, 2012 @ 6:13 pm | Reply
  54. Kelvin Foo:

    Yomero, I am too lazy to argue of a small mistake. So i let it be the last month, but this thing has to be stopped and i believe i have all the right to demand for a refund.

    Kevin if you see this could you please get back to me soon. tq

    June 2, 2012 @ 8:47 am | Reply
  55. Kelvin Foo:

    THIS IS THE 2ND DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE REPLY MY MAIL

    Inquisitor inquisitor@*********.net
    Jun 2 (3 days ago)

    to URPad.net
    Hey admin,

    I have already stop my services more than a month ago. last month you still invoice me, i was thinking probably is not prorata. Now you are invoicing me again ? I have send an email to you and also officially cancel on the website itself.!!!!

    I demand for a refund!!!!!

    Best regards,
    Kelvin

    June 4, 2012 @ 3:21 pm | Reply
  56. Kelvin;

    My sincerest apologies for the inconvenience caused. Its possible you didn’t cancel your subscription recurring charge.

    Please send me a form of identification, such as invoice ID, client ID, or a previous ticket ID so I can locate your account and refund any incorrect charges and disable recurring subscriptions for you.

    I appreciate your time.

    Best,
    Kevin

    June 4, 2012 @ 6:59 pm | Reply
  57. Ram:

    Is the bandwidth offered monthly or yearly… plz tell me

    July 15, 2012 @ 9:57 am | Reply
  58. I have got a msg form URPAD tht

    We have suspended your server on Aug-15 and the details of IP connections as follows

    ———————
    805 dst=199.192.229.174 src=93.170.4.23
    406 dst=199.192.229.174 src=108.83.112.6
    379 dst=199.192.229.174 src=24.170.224.181
    379 dst=199.192.229.174 src=108.82.98.66
    348 dst=199.192.229.174 src=64.120.232.3
    329 dst=199.192.229.174 src=24.239.149.68
    321 dst=199.192.229.174 src=174.48.130.194
    301 dst=199.192.229.174 src=109.163.226.56
    296 dst=199.192.229.174 src=99.90.20.113
    279 dst=199.192.229.174 src=64.120.232.4
    221 dst=199.192.229.174 src=37.35.102.2
    216 dst=199.192.229.174 src=82.37.255.129
    200 dst=199.192.229.174 src=66.87.120.243
    194 dst=199.192.229.174 src=64.120.208.29
    194 dst=199.192.229.174 src=109.163.234.209
    189 dst=199.192.229.174 src=128.127.32.75
    179 dst=199.192.229.174 src=80.197.99.99
    131 dst=199.192.229.174 src=64.120.232.2
    106 dst=199.192.229.174 src=62.75.209.209
    80 dst=199.192.229.174 src=86.167.150.27
    66 dst=199.192.229.174 src=184.22.124.24
    58 dst=199.192.229.174 src=173.255.140.146
    56 dst=199.192.229.174 src=120.56.230.168
    46 dst=199.192.229.174 src=95.147.99.70
    44 dst=199.192.229.174 src=63.143.48.98
    34 dst=199.192.229.174 src=86.142.152.82
    32 dst=199.192.229.174 src=173.255.140.51
    1 dst=199.192.229.174 src=76.76.11.241
    —————————

    If you are planning for any preventive measures it would be easier for us to enable the server back.

    And they have suspended my account due to high connections.

    can anyone give me the solution of how to solve it??please

    August 18, 2012 @ 3:19 am | Reply
  59. Their details and specs look very attractive, but I would suggest staying away from them. Non-existent customer service, poor attitude as others have noted, premature closure of tickets with no solutions, poor refund policy. There are many choices out there, some with much more technically interested folks.

    October 3, 2012 @ 8:15 pm | Reply
  60. WWAlex:

    Ahh, I found the VPS i bought a few months back. Very good.

    But I was wondering, is this package still available? But to extend the bandwidth to 1 TB?

    Also, this is CentOs?

    December 5, 2012 @ 5:44 am | Reply

Leave a Reply

Some notes on commenting on LowEndBox:

  • Do not use LowEndBox for support issues. Go to your hosting provider and issue a ticket there. Coming here saying "my VPS is down, what do I do?!" will only have your comments removed.
  • Akismet is used for spam detection. Quoting webhostingtalk.com URL seems to get binned consistently here, but I do peek into the spam box frequently to publish those comments.
  • Use <pre>...</pre> to quote the output from your terminal/console, or consider using a pastebin service.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <pre> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>