LEA (LowEndAdmin) is the original founder of LowEndBox and the visionary who gave rise to an entire movement around minimalist, efficient hosting. In 2008, LEA launched LowEndBox with a simple but powerful idea: that it was possible to run meaningful applications, web servers, VPNs, mail servers, and more – on small, low-cost virtual machines with minimal resources.
At a time when most infrastructure discussions were dominated by high-end servers and enterprise platforms, LEA championed the opposite approach: lightweight Linux distros, self-managed servers, open source software, and thoughtful optimization. This philosophy gave birth to the term “Low End Box”, which would come to define a new genre of hosting tailored to developers, tinkerers, and budget-conscious users around the world.
Through LowEndBox and its companion forum, LowEndTalk, LEA built the foundation for what would become one of the most active and enduring communities in the hosting world, prioritizing knowledge-sharing, transparency, and accessibility.
After several years of nurturing the site and community, LEA stepped away from active involvement, passing the torch to a new generation of admins, contributors, and moderators. Today, LEA remains a respected figure in the LowEnd ecosystem, credited with launching a platform and philosophy that continues to influence thousands of infrastructure providers and users globally.
LowEndBox’s legacy, and its thriving community, is a direct result of LEA’s original vision.
I subscribed. Latency from North America is not great but the performance is quite satisfactory.
The Debian install has some glitches. It wants to install kernel updates, and of course under Xen it’s not responsible for its own kernel. aptitude/apt-get installations break on the kernel updates, of course. Tech support is working on this but since it doesn’t cause any deleterious effects I’m not too concerned yet.
This vendor has provided good technical service. Provisioning was not automatic or complete. Communications, despite the projected image, have been problematic and somewhat customer-hostile in a generic way. We have observed this with Aussies in general.
A DDoS incident was handled honestly and proactively. Good communications in the case of that incident.
Good connectivity to New Zealand. The vendor offered IPv6 on an experimental basis, but never delivered.
We recommend this vendor, if you can get past the somewhat anti-customer, jump-through-hoops feel. Maybe it’s just that Aussie vendors are a rough-edged lot.
Not all are rough-edged. It just sounds like they don’t handle their customer service side too well.
I have had a very similar experience to Volume VPS User: customer-hostile communications and promising a feature that wasn’t delivered, despite my having paid for it. Eventually, they reluctantly credited my account the overpaid amount, they wouldn’t reimburse me. I’ve moved over to RackSpace and have been very happy.