LowEndBox - Cheap VPS, Hosting and Dedicated Server Deals

MyRSK – $5.99/Month 2GB OpenVZ VPS in US and UK

Tags: , , , , , , Date/Time: November 24, 2013 @ 10:30 pm, by Asim Zeeshan

Rashid, from MyRSK, has got two exclusive offers for LowEndBox readers. Unlike last time, you don’t need any coupon for the offers mentioned below.

OVZ US Offer

  • 2GB RAM
  • 4GB Burst vSwap available
  • 100GB Diskspace
  • 2000GB Bandwidth @ 1Gbps port
  • 2 IPv4 Address
  • OpenVZ/SolusVM
  • $5.99/Month | US Order Link
OVZ UK Offer

  • 2GB RAM
  • 4GB Burst
  • 100GB Diskspace
  • 2000GB Bandwidth @ 1Gbps port
  • 1 IPv4 address
  • OpenVZ/SolusVM
  • $5.99/Month | UK Order Link

MyRSK have appeared on LowEndBox several times since 2012. They are based in Dubai, United Arab Emirates and have been providing services locally since 2009. Included with every plan is 10GB of free backup space and free DNS management. They are using either Dual Xeon 5410, 5420 or 5460 CPUs. Previous reviews have nothing but good things to say. If you’re a customer, or become one, please share your reviews and benchmarks below.

MyRSK accept payments via PayPal. They offer a 5 day, no questions asked, money back guarantee. Plans come with “fair share access” to the Dual XEON processor. IPv6 is not currently available in either of the above location. DirectAdmin licenses are available at $6/month. For more information, do check out their Terms of Service.

Network Information:

US – Kansas City (Datashack)

Test IPv4: 173.208.196.194
http://bit.ly/194OIvs (10 MB)
http://bit.ly/HCyVxB (100MB)

 

UK – Coventry (UKServers)

Test IPv4: 94.229.67.90
http://bit.ly/1c4ULmE (10MB)
http://bit.ly/1abX9so (100MB)

49 Comments

  1. rm:

    > IPv6 is only currently available in either of the above location.

    Sorry what?

    November 25, 2013 @ 12:37 am | Reply
  2. The Test IP for UK Location has rDNS of easrvps.com? O.o

    November 25, 2013 @ 3:58 am | Reply
    • Hello Nagib,

      We have taken over EaseVPS’s clients around a month ago, rDNS entries have not be reupdated.

      Regards,
      R. Alkhaili

      November 25, 2013 @ 7:14 am | Reply
  3. Lucas:

    Are here on LEB a 2Gb OVZ deals boom? :) Who gave a lower price..

    November 25, 2013 @ 4:00 am | Reply
    • Lucas:

      And why you use word – Sexy deals – On LET all the time?

      November 25, 2013 @ 4:02 am | Reply
      • Hello Lucas,

        Because, you have to admit, they are sexy :-)

        Regards,
        R. Alkhaili

        November 25, 2013 @ 7:14 am | Reply
        • Lucas:

          And how about your speech posted on LET > 2 months ago :) @ R.Alkhaili: – ,,We are no longer offering LEB pricing for new orders. Yes, starting next month, we are moving out of LEB into providing managed services > and small to medium business solutions. All current clients will be able to keep their > > pricing with no changes at all,, – You’re saying that you don’t accept new orders with LEB prices range, but still here? :0

          November 25, 2013 @ 7:41 am | Reply
          • Hello Lucas,

            Yes, I understand where you are coming from. After taking over EaseVPS (as you can read above), we have ample of space coming up to accommodate our clients. Therefore, we decided to offer both managed and unmanaged plans by the beginning of new year. With a sharp focus towards the managed plans of course, and they will not be in the LE* price range.

            We will have our current budget/unmanaged plans but once we launch our managed products, there will be no discounts like we have now. It will be just as advertised on our site without further reductions.

            I hope it is a bit more clear now :-)

            Regards,
            R. Alkhaili

            November 25, 2013 @ 8:01 am | Reply
          • Lucas:

            Yep! Many businesses waiting in the queue next year when you start rock the World with your sexy OVZ deals :D

            November 25, 2013 @ 12:26 pm | Reply
            • Hello Lucas,

              KVM, and OVZ :)

              Regards,
              R. Alkhaili

              November 25, 2013 @ 12:32 pm
  4. Dylan:

    I’ve heard good things about MyRSK’s service, but yikes, those are some dated processors for a VPS node. The 5460’s not so bad, but the 5420 is a $49 dedi mainstay and the 5410’s just… ick.

    November 25, 2013 @ 5:06 am | Reply
    • Hello Dylan,

      These processors, although quite old, they are not “legacy”, they are complete work horses and everyone would tell you the same. Client’s prefer to have really good deals at the lowest rates possible. With dual E5’s, I doubt we will be offering the same prices. We offer a really good service, with quality, and good support – this is what matters the most :-)

      Regards,
      R. Alkhaili

      November 25, 2013 @ 7:16 am | Reply
    • W1V_Lee:

      @Dylan, Honestly, WTF do you want? These processors certainly are nice work horses and there is nothing wrong with them at all. For $5.99 you want the best of everything!

      Start with your $49 server, add IP’s, time to set it up and manage it on continual basis and the costs start to add up, people like you need to stop seeing a service like this as nothing more than the price of the server.

      November 25, 2013 @ 3:17 pm | Reply
      • Hello Lee,

        It is ok, we understand where Dylan is coming from :-)

        Hardware RAID, 4 HD’s, IPs, etc, etc. all do add in to the cost. You might be able to get a $49 server, but I doubt it will go far.

        Regards,
        R. Alkhaili

        November 25, 2013 @ 3:24 pm | Reply
  5. can i buy with vcc a i dont have paypal. what do to next ?

    November 25, 2013 @ 6:03 am | Reply
    • Hello Uday,

      If you can use the vcc via paypal, only then it would be possible.

      Regards,
      R. Alkhaili

      November 26, 2013 @ 6:27 am | Reply
  6. Gabriel:

    Hello,
    how many cpu cores does the OVZ UK get? shared or dedicated?

    November 25, 2013 @ 8:11 am | Reply
    • Hello Gabriel,

      Thanks for your interest in our services, the OVZ UK gets 2x shared cores. Dedicated cores will never be priced at a very low rate.

      Regards,
      R. Alkhaili

      November 26, 2013 @ 6:28 am | Reply
  7. I’ve got a couple of boxes with MyRSK (granted neither in these locations) and they’re solid performers. Recommended.

    November 25, 2013 @ 11:39 am | Reply
    • Hello Shawn,

      Thanks for your honest feedback, it has been great to have you on board :-)

      Regards,
      R. Alkhaili

      November 25, 2013 @ 12:33 pm | Reply
  8. I had to wait before signing up with Iniz. I like UK Location, but at that time, I couldn’t find any UK Location Providing host with great prices !

    November 25, 2013 @ 1:58 pm | Reply
  9. Spo0lsh:

    “Changes to this TOS document can and may be changed without notice”
    No, thanks.

    November 26, 2013 @ 2:44 am | Reply
    • Hello Spo0lsh,

      I do understand where you are coming from, but our job is to provide a service with a fair TOS, therefore we think it is the client’s responsibility to check the TOS document. Of course there wont be radical changes that wont be announced.

      We run a fair and honest business model and we have a lot of happy clients :-)

      Plus, it says *may* :P

      Regards,
      R.Alkhaili
      http://www.myrsk.com

      November 26, 2013 @ 3:13 am | Reply
      • Tom Robbins:

        So you agree that if I put the amount I pay under the condition that i *may* change the value. That’s be fine?

        Of course I think it’s the providers responsibility to check the value. Of course there wont be radical changes that I wont announce. I am a fair customer and an honest person and I have a lot of happy providers :-) Plus, it says *may* :P

        November 26, 2013 @ 11:48 am | Reply
        • Hello Tom,

          You got me all confused. If you please could make it simpler for me, I will reply back with my honest opinion.

          Regards,
          R. Alkhaili

          November 26, 2013 @ 12:27 pm | Reply
          • Tom Robbins:

            I guess that’s what happens to clients, too, if they read you can change the TOS without further notification. Hint: I just used your exact wording.

            November 27, 2013 @ 8:45 am | Reply
  10. I use myrsk service, and i haven’t problem until now , good job, maybe i will buy 1 server again to handle my client

    November 26, 2013 @ 4:46 am | Reply
    • That is great news :-)

      It is great to have you as a client of MyRSK.

      Regards,
      R. Alkhaili

      November 26, 2013 @ 6:26 am | Reply
  11. xgx:

    Used them before for few days and asked for refund:

    Disk speed:

    root@test:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 46.6475 s, 23.0 MB/s
    

    UNIX Benchmarks:

    ========================================================================
       BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
    
       System: test.bzzbzz.me: GNU/Linux
       OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686 -- #1 SMP Sun May 6 04:01:19 UTC 2012
       Machine: i686 (unknown)
       Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
       CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4987.5 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
       CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4987.5 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
       13:34:34 up  4:37,  3 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 2
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 08 2013 13:34:34 - 14:03:13
    2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       12508981.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     2538.9 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                                566.8 lps   (29.8 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        566894.7 KBps  (30.1 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          174736.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        806549.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             1324252.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                  94825.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                               1168.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   1904.7 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    314.4 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                        1942451.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   12508981.5   1071.9
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2538.9    461.6
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0        566.8    131.8
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     566894.7   1431.6
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     174736.8   1055.8
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     806549.2   1390.6
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1324252.1   1064.5
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      94825.8    237.1
    Process Creation                                126.0       1168.8     92.8
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       1904.7    449.2
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        314.4    524.0
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1942451.6   1295.0
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                         561.3
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 08 2013 14:03:13 - 14:31:54
    2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       24839928.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     4750.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                               1071.0 lps   (29.7 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        356136.4 KBps  (30.1 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           97185.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        950286.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             2639858.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 147643.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                               1822.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2376.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    282.0 lpm   (60.3 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                        2250234.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   24839928.0   2128.5
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4750.9    863.8
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1071.0    249.1
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     356136.4    899.3
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      97185.8    587.2
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     950286.1   1638.4
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2639858.7   2122.1
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     147643.5    369.1
    Process Creation                                126.0       1822.1    144.6
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2376.9    560.6
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        282.0    470.0
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2250234.6   1500.2
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                         714.6
    
    November 26, 2013 @ 8:00 am | Reply
    • I see that the dd test did come back with a low result. We do keep an eye on things such as this, and to be honest this usually happens to us when we list a deal on LEB. That is because most of the clients run dd tests over and over again. Nonetheless, I will keep a close eye and keep things updated.

      Regards,
      R. Alkhaili

      November 26, 2013 @ 8:22 am | Reply
      • xgx:

        I didn’t order LEB offer, I paid for this VPS 10$ on your site before LEB / LET offer.
        So this is not related to LEB or LET offers, this is how your VPS works.

        November 26, 2013 @ 9:30 am | Reply
        • Hello,

          This could have been brought to our attention, in case we miss some things, after all – we are human and not robots.

          We do still have many happy clients, and to be completely fair, raising up a ticket would have got us investigating the issue further.

          I do however understand that this is not your role, and you shouldn’t do the host’s job. After all, KVM’s tend to have lower results, but not that low.

          I do not want to link it to LE* pricing, but the dilemma here is if you want to get a VPS with the best results in dd, I hope you look for something not in LE* range. Where a host could offer descent specs with 4x SSD’s in RAID 10 or similar.

          Thanks again :-)

          Regards,
          R. Alkhaili

          November 26, 2013 @ 12:31 pm | Reply
          • xgx:

            Again you are wrong.
            I have around 15 LEB VPS, and all of them have better I/O then your vps.
            Some of them are lower priced then yours. To be more precise, all of them have better disk I/O

            Regards

            November 26, 2013 @ 3:26 pm | Reply
          • Simon:

            So what you are saying is, if we pay little money for VPS we shouldn’t expect much?
            We hear that excuse time and time again from hosts like you, and the sad thing is, people put up with it.

            November 26, 2013 @ 4:34 pm | Reply
            • It is true though. Do you think if a host who charges normal rates, for example $15 per vps, shouldn’t he host half what he did before? (Well, that is if they were honest to begin with and not oversell).

              I respect your opinion, but if the vps is running and our clients are happy, then it is good news :)

              Regards,
              R. Alkhaili

              November 27, 2013 @ 6:13 am
        • john:

          MYrsk take your bullshit somewhere else all other companies are better than you.

          December 1, 2013 @ 12:40 pm | Reply
          • In what way are other companies better? All of our clients are satisfied, and the whoever requested refunds were offered the refund on the spot. Customer support and care strives to be the best at MyRSK.

            Regards,
            R. Alkhaili

            December 2, 2013 @ 8:16 am | Reply
  12. jasy:

    can i run runescape bots on this

    November 26, 2013 @ 11:42 am | Reply
  13. Alex:

    “… we are sorry to inform you that we do not have stock for the item you have ordered.”

    Is the UK offer really already gone?

    November 26, 2013 @ 6:42 pm | Reply
    • Hello Alex,

      Thanks for your interest, we will check into the possibility of restocking.

      Regards,
      R. Alkhaili

      November 27, 2013 @ 12:11 am | Reply
  14. desi:

    may i use your vps to torrent leecher and seeding private not for public? i dont see about torrent in your rules
    *sorry for my bad english .. thx

    November 27, 2013 @ 8:46 am | Reply
    • Sorry, “torrent leech” and torrenting is not allowed.

      Regards,
      R. Alkhaili

      November 27, 2013 @ 8:51 am | Reply
  15. Matt:

    Any chance of the UK plan coming back in stock?

    November 29, 2013 @ 5:13 am | Reply
    • Hello Matt,

      Thanks for your interest in our services.

      We do restock (if available) midnight gmt+4.

      Regards,
      R. Alkhaili

      November 29, 2013 @ 8:46 am | Reply
  16. Man:

    Speedtest from Manchester (Melbourne)

    root@server:~# wget http://bit.ly/1abX9so --no-check-certificate
    --2013-12-04 23:02:39-- http://bit.ly/1abX9so
    Resolving bit.ly... 69.58.188.39, 69.58.188.40
    Connecting to bit.ly|69.58.188.39|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved
    Location: https://uk-cov-2.myrsk.com:6767/100mb.test [following]
    --2013-12-04 23:02:39-- https://uk-cov-2.myrsk.com:6767/100mb.test
    Resolving uk-cov-2.myrsk.com... 94.229.67.90
    Connecting to uk-cov-2.myrsk.com|94.229.67.90|:6767... connected.
    WARNING: cannot verify uk-cov-2.myrsk.com's certificate, issued by `/O=SolusVM Slave/OU=cyokswr87c7wf/CN=no.rdns-yet.ukservers.com':
    Self-signed certificate encountered.
    WARNING: certificate common name `no.rdns-yet.ukservers.com' doesn't match requested host name `uk-cov-2.myrsk.com'.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: `1abX9so'

    100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 11.6M/s in 13s

    2013-12-04 23:02:53 (7.56 MB/s) - `1abX9so' saved [104857600/104857600]

    root@server:~#

    December 4, 2013 @ 6:04 pm | Reply
  17. sarin:

    Do you guy have more vps soon instock for usa

    December 17, 2013 @ 5:34 am | Reply
  18. Mike:

    Do you have tunneling enabled? (Kernel-level)

    January 17, 2014 @ 5:40 pm | Reply

Leave a Reply

Some notes on commenting on LowEndBox:

  • Do not use LowEndBox for support issues. Go to your hosting provider and issue a ticket there. Coming here saying "my VPS is down, what do I do?!" will only have your comments removed.
  • Akismet is used for spam detection. Some comments may be held temporarily for manual approval.
  • Use <pre>...</pre> to quote the output from your terminal/console, or consider using a pastebin service.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *