If you’re a hosting provider around these parts, chances are you’ve heard of Clientexec by now. If you haven’t, Clientexec is a web hosting billing & support system, and is considered one of the top alternatives to WHMCS. Beyond just being a WHMCS alternative, it is also a Blesta alternative.

What we like about Clientexec is that it has been in active development since 2003 – that’s the same year that WHMCS was founded, matching their development track record in terms of length. In comparison, Blesta, which is another top WHMCS alternative, has been in active development since 2013.

Clientexec 6.5 Beta 1 is released, and for hosting providers and resellers, this comes with a lot of new exciting features, such as:

• Nominet Registrar Plugin Integration
• Pterodactyl Plugin Integration
• VirtFusion Plugin Integration
• CyberPanel Plugin Integration
• Mollie Integration
• Update Functionality Added to Virtualizor Plugin
• Updated Stripe Integration to Stripe Elements
• Updated Stripe Integration to latest API and to Stripe Elements
• + Dozens of other bug fixes and improvements

More information regarding the changes in 6.5 Beta 1 can be found here.

Here’s a tip on how you can save some money on your Clientexec licensing costs: RackNerd, a provider who actively engages within the LowEndBox and LowEndTalk community and has earned the reputation of being the #1 voted top provider, offers free Clientexec licenses to their customers. The only requirement is that you need to be an active customer with RackNerd. See this LowEndTalk thread for more details on how to get your FREE Clientexec license – hosting providers can consider hosting their Clientexec installation on a RackNerd shared hosting account or RackNerd VPS, to take advantage of hosting their website/CRM off-site, while at the same time reaping the benefits of the free Clientexec license RackNerd provides, which in itself is a $143.40/year value.

Hosting Providers: Have you tried out the Clientexec 6.5 Beta 1 yet? Are you looking forward to upgrading your production installation once it is released to stable? Any feedback/thoughts? Share them in the comments section below – we’d love to hear from you!

• Author
• Recent Posts

raindog308

Dread Lord of LowEnd Content at LowEndBox

I'm raindog308, techno polymath and long-time LowEndTalk community Administrator. My technical interests include all things Unix, perl, python, golang, shell scripting, vintage operating systems such as MVS, and relational database systems such as Oracle, PostgreSQL, and MySQL.

I also enjoy using LEBs! I have an empire of little guys for VPNs, larger guys for apps, and big guys for databases and storage. When I'm not in front a screen I'm into German Shepherd dogs, quality knives, target shooting, theology, tabletop roleplaying games, and forest hiking.

I enjoy writing technical articles here on LowEndBox to help people get more out of their systems. You can find me on LowEndTalk @raindog308

Latest posts by raindog308 (see all)

• IncogNET Teases Their Takeover of the Privacy-Focused Email Hosting Industry - November 17, 2024
• COMMUNITY NEWS: RackNerd LLC, Global IaaS Provider, Expands European Footprint with New Dublin, Ireland Datacenter - November 16, 2024
• Hey Providers – Want Some FREE Advertising During the SuperBowl? - November 14, 2024