LowEndBox - Cheap VPS, Hosting and Dedicated Server Deals

ServerHub – $6.99 Month 2048MB RAM 5 IPv4 OpenVZ VPS in Phoenix & Dallas

Tags: , , , , , Date/Time: May 9, 2013 @ 11:15 pm, by Liam

John, from ServerHub, has sent in three different OpenVZ plans for LowEndBox readers. Since their last offer, ServerHub have expanded to the CoreXchange datacenter in Dallas, Texas.

LEB1-R 1024MB

  • 1 CPU Core
  • 1024MB RAM
  • 1536MB Burst
  • 65GB Diskspace
  • 1000GB Bandwidth
  • 100Mbit Port Speed
  • 1 IPv4 Address
  • 8 IPv6 Addresses
  • OpenVZ/SolusVM
  • $3.99/Month | Order
LEB2-R 1536MB

  • 1 CPU Core
  • 1536MB RAM
  • 2048MB Burst
  • 80GB Diskspace
  • 1500GB Bandwidth
  • 100Mbit Port Speed
  • 1 IPv4 Address
  • 8 IPv6 Addresses
  • OpenVZ/SolusVM
  • $4.99/Month | Order
LEB3-R 2048MB

  • 1 CPU Core
  • 2048MB RAM
  • 2536MB Burst
  • 100GB Diskspace
  • 2500GB Bandwidth
  • 100Mbit Port Speed
  • 5 IPv4 Addresses
  • 8 IPv6 Addresses
  • OpenVZ/SolusVM
  • $6.99/Month | Order

ServerHub is a registered service mark of Eonix Corporation, a registered corporation in the state of Nevada. They have been featured on LowEndBox once before. ServerHub have been in the hosting industry for 12 years now and previously operated as Infinitie Networks before rebranding in September 2012. John tells us that they have updated their landing page with these offers. Only a few reviews, all of which positive, were left on their last offer. If you previously purchased, or plan to; do let us tells us about your experience!

ServerHub accept payments via Visa, MasterCard, AMEX, Discover and PayPal. No money back guarantee or refunds are offered. A range of add ons (disk, ram, bandwidth and CPU) can be purchased when ordering. Additional IPv4 addresses are charged at $1.25 each per month. They allow all legal content including IRC, VPN/Proxies, Adult etc. For more information, have a read of their Terms of Service.

Network Information:

Servers are located in either Phoenix, Arizona:

Test IPv4: 50.2.0.34
Test IPv6: 2607:ff28::1:0
Test Files: 50MB | 100MB | 500MB

or Dallas Texas:

Test IPv4: 50.2.184.92

106 Comments

  1. Joodle:

    :O @ that number of IP adresses
    That’s quite a lot for $6.99 /m lol

    May 9, 2013 @ 11:24 pm | Reply
    • Yomero:

      Indeed
      I was considering this offer for a deployment at Dallas but… I don’t know now…

      May 9, 2013 @ 11:37 pm | Reply
  2. Kingston:

    Newbie question, for the LEB3 offer, what does the 2536MB Burst mean? can I use 2048+2536MB or maximum of 2536MB?

    May 9, 2013 @ 11:54 pm | Reply
    • denos:

      It means your are guaranteed 2048MB of RAM, but if everyone has not used their full allocation of RAM then you will be able to use up to 2536MB.

      May 10, 2013 @ 1:30 pm | Reply
  3. rm:

    No IPv6 in Dallas?

    May 10, 2013 @ 12:15 am | Reply
    • When I e-mailed sales a couple of hours before buying one, they said the Dallas location was new and they didn’t have all the test IPs and files up yet. AFAIK (though I could be wrong), there is IPv6 in Dallas.

      May 10, 2013 @ 5:09 am | Reply
  4. Crazy offer!!…Will get me one:)

    May 10, 2013 @ 12:46 am | Reply
  5. Kurt:

    What templates do you have available?

    May 10, 2013 @ 1:11 am | Reply
    • I got one a few days back. Here’s what’s available in SolusVM:
      arch-2010.05-x86_64-minimal.tar.gz
      CentOS 5 32-bit
      Centos 5 64bit DNS Only
      Centos 5 64bit W/CPanel and Softaculous
      CentOS 6 32bit
      Centos 6 64bit
      Centos 6 64bit With Cpanel
      Centos 6 with CPanel DNSOnly
      Centos 6 with Plesk Panel
      Debian 5 64bit
      Debian 6 32bit
      Debian 6 64 bit
      Fedora 17 64bit
      Suse 11 64bit
      Ubuntu 11.04 64bit
      Ubuntu 12.04 64bit

      May 10, 2013 @ 1:31 am | Reply
      • Brendan Carlson:

        Free CPanel, or pay more to use it?

        May 10, 2013 @ 2:57 am | Reply
        • peppr:

          Obviously pay more.. Template != license

          May 10, 2013 @ 3:03 am | Reply
      • Cpanel can be installed as part of the template. It will show a big yellow banner saying that it is unlicensed, unless you install the license.

        May 10, 2013 @ 2:16 pm | Reply
  6. It says port speed is 100Mbit, but I’ve gotten 20MB/s out of it. DD:

    dd bs=1M count=128 if=/dev/zero of=test conv=fdatasync
    128+0 records in
    128+0 records out
    134217728 bytes (134 MB) copied, 2.59641 s, 51.7 MB/s
    
    May 10, 2013 @ 1:34 am | Reply
    • Some other stuff: My IPv4 addresses were consecutive, additional IPv6 free on request. Support is fairly prompt, though the Kayako system is somewhat confusing. Port speed:

      wget cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
      --2013-05-10 05:38:15--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
      Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)... 205.234.175.175
      Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
      HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
      Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
      Saving to: `100mb.test'
      
      100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 20.1M/s   in 5.4s
      
      2013-05-10 05:38:21 (18.4 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]
      
      May 10, 2013 @ 1:38 am | Reply
    • Hyb:

      That’s pretty poor disk I/O, with SSD caching nowadays people expect a few hundred MB/s.

      May 10, 2013 @ 3:40 am | Reply
      • This is clearly not a VPS for disk-heavy stuff, then. Check out RamNode or SwiftVM for that. Disk I/O has never been a concern of mine, but if it is for you, now you know. It would still make a decent backup VPS with the size of the disk, and you’ll frankly have no problem with processor/memory intensive stuff. Frankly, I’ve never used any type of disk-critical app/system, so as long as you can write to the disk, I’m fine. For the price, I think this is a good offer, and I’m happy with it.

        May 10, 2013 @ 4:03 am | Reply
        • perennate:

          What location is this in?

          May 10, 2013 @ 8:16 pm | Reply
  7. – -5 IPs OK I should told my friend that low price of IPs is coming.

    May 10, 2013 @ 1:46 am | Reply
  8. i have test in date 8/5/2013
    this vps slow conection
    i use for ssh only 230 kbps..
    this nice from web server only… because big ram and disk

    May 10, 2013 @ 3:02 am | Reply
    • Mas bro, memangnya aman ya register domain .us padahal kita orang Indonesia?

      May 10, 2013 @ 3:36 pm | Reply
      • Bayu:

        Aman koq masbro, saya udah setahun lebih punya domain .us walapun bukan buat website aktif sih.

        May 11, 2013 @ 2:57 am | Reply
      • Saya baru nyadar, kalau selama ini saya punya teman baik hati dan hebat, tapi baru tau hari ini setelah buka blognya galihresah. :)

        Terima kasih atas ucapan Idul Fitri yang dulu, dan juga ilmu yang dibagikan di blog :)

        May 17, 2013 @ 1:57 pm | Reply
    • rata2 tunneling kedalas emang segitu mas bro :(

      May 30, 2013 @ 10:55 am | Reply
  9. When you click order it takes you to an empty shopping cart with no information at all what to do.

    May 10, 2013 @ 3:04 am | Reply
  10. great offer….! i get 1 LEB3-R

    here my test…

    [root@NGOES ~]# wget http://speedtest.serverhub.com/50mb.test
    --2013-05-10 07:43:10--  http://speedtest.serverhub.com/50mb.test
    Resolving speedtest.serverhub.com... 50.2.0.34
    Connecting to speedtest.serverhub.com|50.2.0.34|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 50331648 (48M) [text/plain]
    Saving to: `50mb.test'
    
    100%[======================================>] 50,331,648  41.5M/s   in 1.2s
    
    2013-05-10 07:43:12 (41.5 MB/s) - `50mb.test' saved [50331648/50331648]
    
    [root@NGOES ~]# wget http://speedtest.serverhub.com/100mb.test
    --2013-05-10 07:43:42--  http://speedtest.serverhub.com/100mb.test
    Resolving speedtest.serverhub.com... 50.2.0.34
    Connecting to speedtest.serverhub.com|50.2.0.34|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: `100mb.test'
    
    100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 65.5M/s   in 1.5s
    
    2013-05-10 07:43:44 (65.5 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]
    
    [root@NGOES ~]# wget http://speedtest.serverhub.com/500mb.test
    --2013-05-10 07:44:02--  http://speedtest.serverhub.com/500mb.test
    Resolving speedtest.serverhub.com... 50.2.0.34
    Connecting to speedtest.serverhub.com|50.2.0.34|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 503316480 (480M) [text/plain]
    Saving to: `500mb.test'
    
    100%[======================================>] 503,316,480 91.5M/s   in 6.2s
    
    2013-05-10 07:44:09 (77.4 MB/s) - `500mb.test' saved [503316480/503316480]
    

    thank you

    May 10, 2013 @ 3:50 am | Reply
    • I cant believe these results. Are you sure you got one of these servers. There’s no way these are from a 100Mbps port.

      May 10, 2013 @ 3:22 pm | Reply
      • yes i.m
        these my second result

        wget http://speedtest.serverhub.com/50mb.test
        --2013-05-10 20:13:01--  http://speedtest.serverhub.com/50mb.test
        Resolving speedtest.serverhub.com... 50.2.0.34
        Connecting to speedtest.serverhub.com|50.2.0.34|:80... connected.
        HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
        Length: 50331648 (48M) [text/plain]
        Saving to: â50mb.testâ
        
        100%[======================================>] 50,331,648   102M/s   in 0.5s
        
        2013-05-10 20:13:02 (102 MB/s) - â50mb.testâ
        
        May 10, 2013 @ 5:13 pm | Reply
        • Which server are you testing it from?

          May 10, 2013 @ 5:17 pm | Reply
        • I find it strange you said that you got a server from them, then post results of speed tests using their test files. If you’re testing from serverhub server, to serverhub test files within the same network, no doubt you’ll get such a high speed.

          May 10, 2013 @ 5:29 pm | Reply
    • different test from other server

      wget http://192.249.57.166/50mb.test
      --2013-05-10 22:11:14--  http://192.249.57.166/50mb.test
      Connecting to 192.249.57.166:80... connected.
      HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
      Length: 50331648 (48M) [text/plain]
      Saving to: â50mb.test.1â
      
      100%[===========================================================>] 50,331,648   697K/s   in 77s
      
      2013-05-10 22:12:31 (640 KB/s) - â50mb.test.1â
      
      
      # wget cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
      --2013-05-10 22:14:48--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
      Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
      Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
      HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
      Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
      Saving to: â100mb.testâ
      
      100%[===============================================================>] 104,857,600 11.5M/s   in 8.5s
      
      2013-05-10 22:14:57 (11.8 MB/s) - â100mb.testâ
      
      wget http://198.46.136.201/100mb.test
      --2013-05-10 22:21:12--  http://198.46.136.201/100mb.test
      Connecting to 198.46.136.201:80... connected.
      HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
      Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
      Saving to: â100mb.test.1â
      
      100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 18.8M/s   in 6.6s
      
      2013-05-10 22:21:19 (15.3 MB/s) - â100mb.test.1â
      
      May 10, 2013 @ 6:24 pm | Reply
      • That’s more like it. :)

        May 11, 2013 @ 2:10 am | Reply
        • matthewvz:
          minecraft@matthewvz:~$ wget -O /dev/null http://speedtest.serverhub.com/50mb.test
          --2013-05-11 00:18:00--  http://speedtest.serverhub.com/50mb.test
          Resolving speedtest.serverhub.com (speedtest.serverhub.com)... 50.2.0.34
          Connecting to speedtest.serverhub.com (speedtest.serverhub.com)|50.2.0.34|:80... connected.
          HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
          Length: 50331648 (48M) [text/plain]
          Saving to: `/dev/null'
          
          100%[==========================================================================================================================================>] 50,331,648  18.1M/s   in 2.6s
          
          2013-05-11 00:18:03 (18.1 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [50331648/50331648]
          

          This doesn’t seem like a 100Mbit port to me.

          May 11, 2013 @ 4:13 am | Reply
        • Jarvis.M:

          @matthewvz MB -> Mb = x8

          18.1 x 8 = 144.8Mbit/s. Seems more than 100Mbit. Be happy :)

          May 11, 2013 @ 6:49 am | Reply
        • matthewvz:

          Jarvis.M: I was saying it is over 100Mbps, not under :P

          May 11, 2013 @ 7:44 pm | Reply
  11. Well, MaxMind error, perhaps because of my Chinese IP?
    Submitted a ticket and waiting for their reply…

    May 10, 2013 @ 5:34 am | Reply
  12. LEB3-R 2048MB – WOW deal! number of ip’s man

    May 10, 2013 @ 3:19 pm | Reply
  13. perennate:

    Anyone having problems with CPU? I’m just running apt-get upgrade and it’s taking a very very long time to upgrade. Things like running top also seem to take a few seconds before they work.

    May 10, 2013 @ 8:11 pm | Reply
    • Sarah:

      I haven’t had issues with mine, u should contact support they helped solve my problem fast.

      May 10, 2013 @ 9:51 pm | Reply
  14. Convert the 100GB space to 200GB and I’ll gobble it up. ;)

    May 11, 2013 @ 2:19 am | Reply
    • They do offer customization of the order on the site, but disk space is the only thing you can upgrade :(

      May 11, 2013 @ 11:24 am | Reply
    • Yea, their customization options are quite novel, and a rarity on LEB. Just a friendly advise to you guys, next time, be flexible with your IPs too..

      See, right now, your premium plan has five IPv4s, while most people need only 1. At the same time, most people prefer a quad core for a configuration with 2 GB RAM. So why not have something with 4 cores, and just 1 IPv4 to start with, at the LEB limit of $7. Price it at $6, and you’ll have a crowd.

      Economics are sound.
      4 cores cost $3.99
      4 IPv4s cost $5.
      Losing 4 IPs and getting 4 cores would be nice.

      Also some of your upgrades are weirdly priced.
      65 GB to 75GB upgrade is $14.99. WTH?
      65 GB to 100GB is $19.99. Is there a point in paying $20 for getting just 35GB RAM, when one can just purchase the $7 plan.

      May 13, 2013 @ 2:48 pm | Reply
      • The last statement had a typo. Disk Space, not RAM.

        May 13, 2013 @ 2:49 pm | Reply
      • rm:

        They just seem have a surplus of IPv4, the AS announces something like 131 thousands (a /15), so IPs don’t cost to them anywhere close to what you said. So all your convoluted math is not even close to being valid.

        May 13, 2013 @ 5:15 pm | Reply
        • That wasn’t math. That was a copy paste of the cost of these addon resources on their site. I wasn’t talking about what IPs cost them. I was describing the cost they’ve mentioned for addon IPs in plans where they offer it.

          May 13, 2013 @ 5:40 pm | Reply
  15. joe:

    nice ips but 1 core wow no thanx

    May 11, 2013 @ 8:26 am | Reply
  16. karistuck:

    lol Great!!

    I ordered it

    Thx

    May 11, 2013 @ 11:39 am | Reply
  17. Sal:

    How long do accounts take to be provisioned? I just put in my order but I haven’t even gotten an email confirmation.

    May 11, 2013 @ 4:08 pm | Reply
    • Ian:

      Spam, check your spam! I promise you it’s there.

      May 13, 2013 @ 12:48 am | Reply
  18. @ServerHub:

    Would you be interested in having your VPS listed @ http://geekahost.com/db/show.php ?

    May 12, 2013 @ 12:55 am | Reply
  19. Tom:

    Provisioning takes some time apparently. A little weird when you’re used to automated systems that send you your info as soon as payment is made. Going on about 14 hours waiting for provisioning.

    May 12, 2013 @ 4:41 pm | Reply
    • Tom:

      Also forgot to add, spam filters picked up emails, you should probably add that to your confirmation pages to add the email so it doesn’t get caught by junk filters. :/

      May 12, 2013 @ 4:45 pm | Reply
      • Ian:

        Same here, I got them all in my Spam box. :\

        May 13, 2013 @ 12:48 am | Reply
  20. Ian:

    I purchased this yesterday. Apparently the VPS corrupted itself, so they had to reset it. I’m not able to SSH into it right now. They were responsive with the first ticket, but still waiting for updates on not being able to SSH into it. Overall, seems like a great service.

    I’ll update on this soon

    May 12, 2013 @ 5:53 pm | Reply
  21. I grabbed one late Saturday night and thus far I’ve been pretty happy with it (albeit, not productive). I opted to upgrade to a dual core for the extra $1.99. After toying around with CentOS 6.4 for a little bit I reinstalled with an Ubuntu image (12.04), got it upgraded to 13.04 without any issue and it’s resting at a cool 1.8GB free – and I haven’t started tearing it down and tweaking it yet.

    A great deal – I’m very happy with it so far.

    May 13, 2013 @ 10:12 am | Reply
  22. Ted:

    Ordered one yesterday, experienced very slow SSH responses and lots of FTP timeouts. Submitted a support ticket nearly 24 hours with no response.

    May 13, 2013 @ 2:06 pm | Reply
  23. Raghavendra:

    I did try these guys earlier.. It’ll be great until you get a hardware/network/solus issue. Once the issue starts, there’ll be no one to help you on support desk(you are lucky if you get a reply in 24 hours)..
    Never use it for hosting any thing critical.

    May 13, 2013 @ 2:19 pm | Reply
    • Jason:

      How long ago did you use their service? I signed up on the last offer and have had no issue getting response from support.

      May 13, 2013 @ 3:17 pm | Reply
  24. Tom:

    I don’t like to be the complainer, as I’d much rather be raving about good service…

    15 hours to provision because my account was “flagged” for manual review. (Payment went through fine, so why the flag?)

    IPv6 allocated but doesn’t work at all, 15 hours to get a response that its being “looked into”. Still waiting.

    Website is broken, not slightly, but extremely. Log in and attempt to use the customer portal, it’s absolutely brutal.

    The deals are great, but had to know this was all too good to be true once I signed up. Only give I have is that I signed up on a weekend, so let’s hope business hours prove to be better.

    May 13, 2013 @ 5:02 pm | Reply
    • I completely agree with their backend – it’s a mess and doesn’t offer an impressive featureset. Looks like running 2-3 independent companies was busier than anticipated; the solution: just slap them all together.

      May 13, 2013 @ 5:11 pm | Reply
      • John:

        Michael,

        We only have 1 brand, our Support and Billing portals are separated. It is something we are looking to merge in the future, however at this time they are different portals.

        May 14, 2013 @ 10:14 pm | Reply
    • John:

      Tom

      I am very sorry you experienced a delay in your initial order. Sometimes orders require additional review prior to activation. I am glad that this was resolved for you quickly and welcome to the ServerHub Family

      May 14, 2013 @ 10:13 pm | Reply
  25. Jesse:

    Do the prices go up after the first month?

    May 13, 2013 @ 6:10 pm | Reply
  26. Tom:

    With lack of support responses, not sure what to say on that one. However the support team seems to have fixed all of my issues, and my vps is working exceptionally well. As long as this continues, I do believe this should be a sexy provider to have.

    May 14, 2013 @ 7:54 pm | Reply
  27. Sal:

    Avoid this provider at all cost. Fourth day since I purchased VPS and I still can’t access it. They sent me access information to their VPS management console that did not work. They sent me access information for the VPS that did not work. I have asked for a refund due to non-delivery of product I purchased.

    May 15, 2013 @ 12:27 am | Reply
    • ros:

      Have you tried contacting their support? just because your login info didn’t work doesn’t mean they suck, solusvm is one the buggiest vm panels and sometimes they don’t provision right.

      May 15, 2013 @ 1:40 am | Reply
  28. ros:

    Love this deal, got a VPS from them during the their last LEB special and so far great support and service. One of their guys I think named Tyler was a great help when I had issues.

    May 15, 2013 @ 1:43 am | Reply
  29. Harshad:

    Takes several hours to provision the VPS + bad network, unable to even ping the server.

    Cancelled account.

    May 15, 2013 @ 2:05 am | Reply
  30. alex:

    what’s the significance of having multiple IPv6s? I have no idea just because I legitimately do not know much, and am curious. Is there a certain task ya’ll do that requires multiple IPs?
    Thanks

    May 15, 2013 @ 4:41 am | Reply
    • Ian Carroll:

      Sometimes, hosting companies need dedicated IP’s. There are also other needs for it, such as special programs that don’t support multiple sets of applications per IP.

      May 15, 2013 @ 7:17 pm | Reply
  31. Sk:

    worst VPS provider . I got a server from them last month. but mid of this month i had to stop my service. servers are always down. more than 10-20min per day. Time to time serve down.

    May 15, 2013 @ 10:54 am | Reply
    • Jason:

      Did you contact support? My server has never been down over the last month and I am using pingdom to check. Maybe just the node you are on. With a popular offer like this they are likely to get some bad customers. Im sure they will move you to another server if you ask.

      May 16, 2013 @ 2:55 am | Reply
      • Sk:

        Why not. i asked lot of times to them to fix this issues. always they are telling we will investigating this issue.i think they are still investigating. but they could not stop my server down issue.

        May 17, 2013 @ 6:51 am | Reply
        • ros:

          Maybe a bad node, should ask to be moved. They have done that for me in past.

          May 17, 2013 @ 7:48 am | Reply
  32. Ian Carroll:

    Ok. I’ve gotten my server with 5 IP addresses, and it’s kinda weird. Nano was not installed by default (this is Ubuntu), and it did take a while to get the server. I’m going to test to see if those IP’s are mine.

    May 15, 2013 @ 7:15 pm | Reply
    • Ian Carroll:

      Also, this is the wget:
      om/downloads/test500.zip
      –2013-05-15 23:22:02– http://speedtest.wdc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test500.zip
      Resolving speedtest.wdc01.softlayer.com (speedtest.wdc01.softlayer.com)… 208.43.102.250
      Connecting to speedtest.wdc01.softlayer.com (speedtest.wdc01.softlayer.com)|208.43.102.250|:80… connected.
      HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
      Length: 524288000 (500M) [application/zip]
      Saving to: `/dev/null’

      46% [=================> ] 244,829,032 26.4M/s eta 12s

      May 15, 2013 @ 7:22 pm | Reply
  33. perennate:

    My server has been decent so far. There was a very slow CPU at the start but I think it’s resolved. For what I’m running it works, only got it for the IP addresses anyway.

    May 17, 2013 @ 8:16 pm | Reply
    • perennate:

      Strange. Just today when I wrote that my VPS starts going offline :/
      Has been going off and on for the last twenty minutes I think.

      May 18, 2013 @ 1:18 am | Reply
      • perennate:

        Server is still offline at this time, support said that they are investigating but failed to give any additional information on what’s causing the issues.

        May 18, 2013 @ 4:58 am | Reply
      • perennate:

        Relatedly: some providers use email for support and others web-based ticket system. But ServerHub seems to use a convoluted hybrid: When I submit a ticket it sends me an email and responses also come over email; so I’m not sure how to reply to a response… I’m assuming I just email them back, but all in all it’s very confusing. Honestly would be better just to have a support email address like EDIS does in that case.

        May 18, 2013 @ 5:08 am | Reply
      • perennate:

        Server is back online!

        May 18, 2013 @ 6:23 am | Reply
  34. I ordered two days ago and got flagged for manual review… they haven’t gotten back to me yet even though I opened up a ticket and explained my situation.

    May 18, 2013 @ 8:45 pm | Reply
  35. desi elvira:

    I bought this server just now, and its all running smoothly .. i love this server now :)
    http://prntscr.com/16epxs

    i order LEB1-R 1024MB, and I just added a 1 core cpu only, so i have 2 core now :)
    http://prntscr.com/16eqih

    so, i hope this server and they service can be good. sorry if my english isn’t good, i’m from indonesia

    thx serverhub

    May 24, 2013 @ 10:43 am | Reply
  36. I bought the LEB3-R 2048MB VPS with 2 CPU Cores 3 weeks ago. Until now I’m happy with this server. The UnixBench results during one day between 900 and 1500 points. The first 2 days there were some problems with the network (about 6 hours). The support told me it was a DOS attack.

    May 29, 2013 @ 4:25 pm | Reply
  37. I have purchased one of the above servers from ServerHub at their Dallas location. I’ve put up a speedtest below.

    http://box.1e10.net/100mb.test

    June 2, 2013 @ 12:31 pm | Reply
  38. Dayro:

    Unable to resist thoir offer. Finally take one arizona VPS. Wanna try it for 1 month.

    Fast activation. Less than 1 minutes after payment, server up and running. Hope their support also fast considering some complain above me

    June 5, 2013 @ 6:47 am | Reply
  39. Tom:

    Took them up on their 2048 plan yesterday and I’m very happy with it.
    As D.Strout posted previously, my IPv4 addresses were all sequential which is nice :P

    Activation email came through before I even got redirected from PayPal back to ServerHub!

    Have set up all my glue records for IPv4 and IPv6 and now I’m gonna start transferring my sites over.

    June 7, 2013 @ 12:50 pm | Reply
  40. 100% network Availability
    100% Native IPv6 network
    30 Minute Support Ticket Response
    24/7/365 Customer Support
    End-To-End Cisco powered network
    ….

    Is a lie,The fact is support is very poor,nobody reply your TK…

    June 15, 2013 @ 11:06 am | Reply
  41. DaveQB:

    I couldn’t resist. Signed up. Server set up in minutes.
    So far, so good.

    June 16, 2013 @ 4:23 pm | Reply
  42. Ari:

    The OpenVZ Quota for cPanel not working..

    please help to fix that..

    July 4, 2013 @ 12:01 pm | Reply
  43. am-fs:

    Been waiting 2 days now for my services, no emails, no way to contact. Live chat is not “Live”. Nothing from there support …….. waste of money. No way to contact them ……..Stay Away

    July 9, 2013 @ 3:29 pm | Reply
    • am-fs:

      got a refund ………. Thanks LEB

      July 10, 2013 @ 4:25 am | Reply
  44. ad:

    but they have good design and shit services

    July 25, 2013 @ 6:26 pm | Reply
  45. Just ordered the LEB3-R 2048MB from these guys. The initial server did not spin up. Support responded and had it fixed in under 40 minutes. Server’s speeds to other 100 meg test files from other providers indicate a 100 M/bs port. So far so good!

    August 2, 2013 @ 9:14 pm | Reply
  46. John:

    Did their support online ?
    purchased their VPS 1 days ago. but can’t even access to my vps after i recived the vps info.

    2 support tickets almost 24+ hours now but never get reply! there are very bad service! dM how to request refund?

    August 27, 2013 @ 5:12 pm | Reply
  47. I haven’t used my two serverhub OpenVZ instances to get a great feel for performance but have to say customer service is brilliant. One of my instances was on a hardware host that didn’t have the needed kernel modules for connection tracking. Submitted a ticket and solved very quickly.

    August 28, 2013 @ 12:47 am | Reply
  48. jhon:

    Hi guys latest speed test for Dallas location ,
    This VPS plan goes waste day by day server speed is down too slow you can’t open cpanel at lease within 1 min.

    [root@core ~]# wget http://centos.excellmedia.net/6.5/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.5-x86_64-LiveCD.iso
    –2014-02-02 07:07:25– http://centos.excellmedia.net/6.5/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.5-x86_64-LiveCD.iso
    Resolving centos.excellmedia.net… 202.153.32.16
    Connecting to centos.excellmedia.net|202.153.32.16|:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 680525824 (649M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: “CentOS-6.5-x86_64-LiveCD.iso”

    100%[======================================>] 680,525,824 3.37M/s in 2m 53s

    2014-02-02 07:10:20 (3.74 MB/s) – “CentOS-6.5-x86_64-LiveCD.iso” saved [680525824/680525824]

    February 1, 2014 @ 11:19 pm | Reply
  49. Paul:

    Guys beware, pathetic service, its run by a school kid and extremely unreliable.

    February 16, 2014 @ 10:39 pm | Reply

Leave a Reply

Some notes on commenting on LowEndBox:

  • Do not use LowEndBox for support issues. Go to your hosting provider and issue a ticket there. Coming here saying "my VPS is down, what do I do?!" will only have your comments removed.
  • Akismet is used for spam detection. Some comments may be held temporarily for manual approval.
  • Use <pre>...</pre> to quote the output from your terminal/console, or consider using a pastebin service.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *