Hosting Websites on Bare Minimum VPS/Dedicated Servers

VPSCorner – $1.75/Month 512MB OpenVZ VPS in Chisinau, Moldova

Tags: , , , Date/Time: April 28, 2013 @ 2:37 pm, by Liam

Simon, from VPSCorner, has sent in these two offers located in Moldova. By using the coupon code LEB-APRIL, you can get 30% off their normal prices (aka the prices shown below).

OpenVZ – 512MB VPS

  • 512MB Ram
  • 1 vCPU Core
  • 10GB Diskspace
  • 500GB Bandwidth
  • 100Mbit Port Speed
  • 1 IPv4 Address
  • 2 IPv6 Addresses
  • OpenVZ/SolusVM
  • Coupon: LEB-APRIL
  • $1.75/Month | Order Link
OpenVZ – 1GBVPS

  • 1024MB Ram
  • 1 vCPU Core
  • 20GB Diskspace
  • 1000GB Bandwidth
  • 100Mbit Port Speed
  • 1 IPv4 Address
  • 2 IPv6 Addresses
  • OpenVZ/SolusVM
  • Coupon: LEB-APRIL
  • $3.50/Month | Order Link

VPSCorner are a registered Ltd company in the United Kingdom. We have featured VPSCorner once before, and that was about a month ago when they were offering a 1536MB OpenVZ plan for $4.99 a month. Reviews on their last post were great which is always a good thing to see. Simon says to cope with demand this time, they have 2 additional nodes setup – so there should be no processing delays. IPv6 is now also provided.

VPSCorner accepts payments via Paypal. They will provide a refund if you’re not happy within the first 72 hours of service. They offer a 99.99% uptime guarantee and servers will be setup instantly. Additional IPv6 are free of charge but require justification. For more information, have a read of their Terms of Service.

Network Information:

Servers are located in Chisinau, Moldova.

Test IPv4: 178.17.169.90
Test File: Contact them.

139 Comments

  1. Albert:

    Excessive ping from Spain:

    Traza a la dirección 178-17-169-90.static-host.net [178.17.169.90]
    sobre un máximo de 30 saltos:

    1 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
    2 2 ms 1 ms 2 ms 192.168.0.1
    3 15 ms 16 ms 13 ms
    4 * 14 ms 14 ms 10.4.131.179
    5 * 16 ms 17 ms 172.29.160.97
    6 * 21 ms 26 ms 85.205.11.154
    7 21 ms 21 ms 21 ms 85.205.11.153
    8 69 ms 67 ms 71 ms 85.205.7.189
    9 71 ms 66 ms 71 ms 188.111.129.49
    10 60 ms 67 ms 59 ms 188.111.129.26
    11 114 ms 81 ms 82 ms mx01.Stockholm.gldn.net [195.69.145.153]
    12 112 ms 112 ms 111 ms pe-l.Rostov.gldn.net [79.104.233.254]
    13 143 ms 142 ms 142 ms 62.141.95.198
    14 137 ms 135 ms 136 ms host-static-212-0-200-102.moldtelecom.md [212.0.
    200.102]
    15 118 ms 117 ms 116 ms ae1-3400.cr01.ch.md.as43289.net [178.17.160.229]

    16 117 ms 118 ms 117 ms evo.vpscorner.co.uk [178.17.169.42]
    17 117 ms 118 ms 116 ms 178-17-169-90.static-host.net [178.17.169.90]

    Traza completa.

    April 28, 2013 @ 2:54 pm | Reply
  2. DanielM:

    if they have biz reg, how come domain says “UK Individual”

    April 28, 2013 @ 3:16 pm | Reply
    • The domain was set-up A few days before business papers all went through. So we couldn’t legally obtain business status on domain registration, We will however contact OVH the provider of domain an speak about having the whois information transferred to the business details.

      Sorry for the confusion.

      April 28, 2013 @ 3:49 pm | Reply
    • If you would like to confirm business registration you can do so by visiting : http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk//wcframe?name=accessCompanyInfo

      And entering either VPSCorner or 08442530

      Regards,
      Simon

      April 28, 2013 @ 3:53 pm | Reply
      • DanielM:

        good to know :), thanks for the confirmation simon

        April 28, 2013 @ 4:09 pm | Reply
  3. salakis:

    Ordered the 512MB package.
    Will report about it, but right now, I’m stuck at “fraud”.

    April 28, 2013 @ 3:19 pm | Reply
    • If maxmind has flagged for fraud please contact our support an we will see if it was a false positive. Its rare orders are flagged for fraud so it would most likely be down to ip geo-location compared to billing provided, Contact us an we will investigate.

      April 28, 2013 @ 3:50 pm | Reply
      • salakis:

        Everything got resolved quickly. Thanks!

        April 29, 2013 @ 3:21 pm | Reply
  4. anar:

    waiting for plan 2 or 4 core

    April 28, 2013 @ 3:33 pm | Reply
    • Hi Anar,

      Do you mean you are waiting for us to get 2 or 4 core packages or that you have ordered and are waiting?.

      Thanks.

      April 28, 2013 @ 3:55 pm | Reply
  5. LinuxMania:

    I recently ordered, and got my vps the cheapest 512 Mb vps. Until now everything is ok, but I’ll test it for a few days. I think, this is very pretty service for this price!

    April 28, 2013 @ 4:08 pm | Reply
    • Thank you for the feedback, Any issues just drop us a message.

      April 28, 2013 @ 4:10 pm | Reply
  6. Lucas:

    Ou,instant setup, and promo code works with all billing cycles. Nice offer :)

    April 28, 2013 @ 4:32 pm | Reply
  7. no chinese. http error code 403

    April 28, 2013 @ 5:09 pm | Reply
    • Sorry but we blocked china completely due to a vast amount of fraud an hacking attempt, We value our customers security over obtaining sales in china. As unfair as it may be that has to be our position at this time, Im sure most understand.

      April 28, 2013 @ 5:26 pm | Reply
  8. Joodle:

    Just purchased one :)
    Never had a vps in this location

    April 28, 2013 @ 5:17 pm | Reply
    • Moldova is an unusual location for VPS hosting, But the little locations can do surprisingly well. And personally we would say the datacenter’s in unusual locations are all run by close teams who value customers. Ensuring we can have constant close contact to resolve any issues, Rather than being a tadpole in a ocean.

      April 28, 2013 @ 5:29 pm | Reply
  9. user123:

    Why does the order page say “CPU Cores 0.5”, while the offer on the LEB page is for “1 vCPU Core”?

    April 28, 2013 @ 5:55 pm | Reply
    • I imagine this is an accident on LEBs behalf as the 1GB VPS we provide is 1 core but the 0.5 is for the 512. The 0.5 for the 512 has been that way since its creation and has not been changed.I will get Simon to deal with this. Thanks.

      April 28, 2013 @ 6:04 pm | Reply
      • I can confirm that we do guarantee 0.5% of a core on the 512 package but one core is allocated.

        April 28, 2013 @ 6:10 pm | Reply
      • Correction, 1 VCore is provided as u can’t physically provide half a core, We half the usage % though, So 512MB package has 50% cpu usage while 1GB package has 100% cpu usage of that single core.

        Both do have a single core attached.

        April 28, 2013 @ 6:11 pm | Reply
        • Fritz:

          I guess we will suffer high load all the time easily because of that “half core”, won’t we?
          Please correct me if I’m wrong.

          April 29, 2013 @ 12:03 am | Reply
        • No, it really depends on what you’re doing and what you plan on using the VPS for.

          April 29, 2013 @ 8:15 pm | Reply
  10. Spirit:

    Interesting offer. 512MB vps is only $17.50 if you prepay it yearly.

    April 28, 2013 @ 7:31 pm | Reply
  11. Emil Vals:

    Do you provide rDNS for v4/v6?

    April 28, 2013 @ 7:34 pm | Reply
    • Yes, we provide rDNS please open a ticket. Thanks.

      April 28, 2013 @ 8:18 pm | Reply
  12. Spirit:

    SolusVM seems misconfigured. Login notifications alert mails contain vpscorner.co.uk SolusVM IP instead my own.

    Username : vmuserxxx
    IP Address : 38.109.xxx.xxx <— this lfcvps IP
    Hostname : solusvm.vpscorner.co.uk

    April 28, 2013 @ 7:44 pm | Reply
    • This is an issue which is being raised with SolusVM. Thanks for alerting us.

      Let me stress this is not a configuration problem as there is no option to configure such templates they are pre-done by SolusVM if you can forward said email to us we will be able to tell exactly which notification email is showing wrong ip.

      This is not a mis-configuration nor bad set-up, Purely a bug within SolusVM

      April 28, 2013 @ 8:09 pm | Reply
    • I can confirm where the bug has occured it’s due to our solusvm is run behind a reverse proxy so we can enable caching of more content rather than allowing apache to stress out handling loading of repeat images we did this as we cannot use a CDN network such as cloudflare for solusvm.

      Your right it was a configuration error NOT with solusvm but merely with it picking up the reverse proxy in middle as the end user when infact it should be using Fowarding for check.

      April 28, 2013 @ 8:14 pm | Reply
      • Spirit:

        It’s not problem for me, I just informed you in case you didn’t know. I would open support ticket but as I see you active in this thread I just posted it here :) Thank you for fast response.

        April 28, 2013 @ 9:03 pm | Reply
  13. We are working to resolve issue with solusVM and IP forwarding and have enabled SSL for solusvm for extra security.

    April 28, 2013 @ 8:36 pm | Reply
  14. rblp:

    Just ordered the smallest. Got it instantly after I had paid my invoice. Runs smoothly and nice ping from within EU. All great so far.

    April 28, 2013 @ 8:54 pm | Reply
    • Thanks for the feedback. Any issues please open a ticket and let us know.

      April 29, 2013 @ 8:16 pm | Reply
  15. We have now patched issue thanks to fast help from SolusVM team.

    April 28, 2013 @ 9:07 pm | Reply
  16. Jack:

    This offer makes me laugh..

    April 28, 2013 @ 9:09 pm | Reply
    • How do you mean, Nice cost?

      April 28, 2013 @ 9:12 pm | Reply
      • Jack:

        No this bit;

        Simon:
        This is an issue which is being raised with SolusVM. Thanks for alerting us.

        This is not a mis-configuration nor bad set-up, Purely a bug within SolusVM

        April 28, 2013 @ 10:07 pm | Reply
        • Yeah seems daft now posting that only to then discover was an issue with our set-up.

          after talks with solusvm staff turned out to be an issue due to our unusual set-up behind reverse proxy’s, So SolusVM never added ability to grab real client’s ip.

          Handled it though didn’t take us long to work out where going wrong an correct it, We all learn from mistakes :)

          Although it wasn’t actually a SolusVM configuration issue as there is no configurable options for such problems, It was merely an overlooked adaption to solusvm.

          April 28, 2013 @ 10:55 pm | Reply
        • Spirit:

          Hey, he updated his post and corrected this statement. Many hosts I know would just stick with it or even wouldn’t bother to check what’s about to correct mistake.

          April 28, 2013 @ 10:58 pm | Reply
  17. prokurist:

    Hello, these guys had another offer hear some time ago. If there’s anyone around here who bought back then, can they provide some reviews please. Disk IO, etc… Is this reliable enough to be a main server?

    April 29, 2013 @ 12:01 am | Reply
    • I’m not sure if you had any luck getting some feedback but our VPS are reliable. We provide excellent support and lots of OS distros for you to choose from. If you have any concerns of specific requirements please open a support ticket and we will help you as much as we can.

      April 29, 2013 @ 8:07 pm | Reply
  18. BTw As this is a LEB exclusive offer we are making the 30% discount cover the whole range of vps servers from the 512MB plan to 4GB plan an all billing periods. :)

    April 29, 2013 @ 1:05 am | Reply
  19. beardyjay:

    Sadly all the 512MB plans are displaying out of stock now.

    April 29, 2013 @ 6:22 am | Reply
    • We have added more stock, Currently attempting to have new nodes setup just before last one fills each time to have enough for orders. We did fine for few nodes, Now just awaiting More hardware. Then Will have even more stock. At present were about nearly sold out for few hours.

      I knew we planned for demand but kinda should guessed demand would be higher than predicted with nice prices like these :)

      April 29, 2013 @ 11:39 am | Reply
      • When will be stocks full filled,and anyways for us to know?

        April 30, 2013 @ 11:35 am | Reply
        • We have had stock whole time about few hours out of stock yesterday but all back working

          April 30, 2013 @ 3:40 pm | Reply
        • still

          Oops, there’s a problem…

          Out of Stock
          We are currently out of stock on this item so orders for it have been suspended until more stock is available. For further information, please contact us.

          May 1, 2013 @ 7:59 am | Reply
  20. We have filled the servers up and will be working to bring these back in stock as soon as we can. We appologize for any inconvenience caused by this and we will update as soon as we can. Thanks.

    April 29, 2013 @ 9:09 am | Reply
  21. Zmajur:

    On front page 2GB VPS Server offer 2 CPU cores, but on plan or order page it seams only one CPU core. So, what will be? One or two cores.

    Thanks for support!

    April 29, 2013 @ 9:15 am | Reply
    • This was a mis-print, please check now and it should be fixed.

      April 29, 2013 @ 8:17 pm | Reply
  22. David J.:

    Just ordered a 1 GB VPS. Not a fan of OpenVZ but the location/price makes it worth it. Still waiting on ‘Processing’, though.

    Let’s hope this provider sticks around (and fixes the domain issue with OVH soon).

    April 29, 2013 @ 11:13 am | Reply
    • Don’t worry we intend to stick around. Please let us know if you have any issues but assuming payment is completed all should be well and the VPS should be setup. We did run out of stock so at the time of posting this may of been the case but I can confirm we are now back in stock and sorted.

      April 29, 2013 @ 8:05 pm | Reply
  23. This was an mis-print as all pages wasn’t syncd, Was overlooked but sorted now.

    April 29, 2013 @ 11:29 am | Reply
  24. Albert:

    Excessive ping from Spain:

    Traza a la dirección 178-17-169-90.static-host.net [178.17.169.90]
    sobre un máximo de 30 saltos:

    1 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
    2 2 ms 1 ms 2 ms 192.168.0.1
    3 15 ms 16 ms 13 ms
    4 * 14 ms 14 ms 10.4.131.179
    5 * 16 ms 17 ms 172.29.160.97
    6 * 21 ms 26 ms 85.205.11.154
    7 21 ms 21 ms 21 ms 85.205.11.153
    8 69 ms 67 ms 71 ms 85.205.7.189
    9 71 ms 66 ms 71 ms 188.111.129.49
    10 60 ms 67 ms 59 ms 188.111.129.26
    11 114 ms 81 ms 82 ms mx01.Stockholm.gldn.net [195.69.145.153]
    12 112 ms 112 ms 111 ms pe-l.Rostov.gldn.net [79.104.233.254]
    13 143 ms 142 ms 142 ms 62.141.95.198
    14 137 ms 135 ms 136 ms host-static-212-0-200-102.moldtelecom.md [212.0.200.102]
    15 118 ms 117 ms 116 ms ae1-3400.cr01.ch.md.as43289.net [178.17.160.229]
    16 117 ms 118 ms 117 ms evo.vpscorner.co.uk [178.17.169.42]
    17 117 ms 118 ms 116 ms 178-17-169-90.static-host.net [178.17.169.90]

    Traza completa.

    April 29, 2013 @ 1:51 pm | Reply
  25. Michael Austin:

    Just tried to order one, says out of stock. Will more stock be added?

    April 29, 2013 @ 3:53 pm | Reply
    • Stock is selling out rapidly, We have more nodes set-up Just finishing up syncing of templates.

      I say approx 10-20 minutes at latest.

      April 29, 2013 @ 4:10 pm | Reply
    • Back in stock :) Sorry for delay

      April 29, 2013 @ 4:24 pm | Reply
  26. Ordered one, and instant setup.
    I love your custom panel :)

    April 29, 2013 @ 4:38 pm | Reply
    • One problem is that we can’t change the root password from SolusVM.

      April 29, 2013 @ 4:56 pm | Reply
      • Edited : Took a long time, but can work
        I have to reboot the vps first via SolusVM

        April 29, 2013 @ 5:06 pm | Reply
      • I can confirm that changing the root password works fine and should be instant. I know that sometimes with WHMCS it can require a reboot before it recognizes the new root password so it depends on what you were doing.

        April 29, 2013 @ 8:00 pm | Reply
  27. tomaz:

    Ordered a tiny one and got it set up even before I got confirmation email. Let’s hope it will serve us well :)

    April 29, 2013 @ 4:52 pm | Reply
    • Thanks for the feedback. Any issues please don’t hesitate to open a ticket.

      April 29, 2013 @ 8:00 pm | Reply
      • Tomaz:

        I did open a ticket for rDNS (as a low priority ticket) and it was answered in 2 (two) minutes. Support is really great!

        April 30, 2013 @ 4:52 pm | Reply
  28. Moritz:

    Hello,

    I ordered the 512MB VPS and instant setup is awesome! Thanks for that, but it would be really nice, if you would provide a debian 6.0 minimal installation. Is that possible? :) Thanks in advance!

    April 29, 2013 @ 5:08 pm | Reply
    • We will look into this for you. Please open a support ticket if you would like to see a specific OS and we will do our best to source it for you and also as a reminder and so that Simon notices and can arrange this.

      April 29, 2013 @ 8:02 pm | Reply
  29. Emil Vals:

    Node specs?

    April 29, 2013 @ 5:34 pm | Reply
    • Node vary depending on what available at time.

      specs are usually
      i7 cores mainly 3770’s
      32-64gb ram
      2 x 2tb HD Raid 1 – software
      100mbps port speed

      We dont pack with ram as we dont like to load nodes with to many vps’s cos we have to take disk io an cpu into account not just ram.

      Hope the info helps :)

      April 29, 2013 @ 8:18 pm | Reply
  30. Moritz:

    Hello,

    I ordered the 512mb vps and it works fine, but is it possible to use a debian 6.0 minimal installation? I would really like that! thanks in advance :)

    April 29, 2013 @ 5:36 pm | Reply
    • As a note and followup to my previous reply we have 4+ debian variations including 32/64 and different stacks but if you’re looking for something specific please open a ticket.

      April 29, 2013 @ 8:03 pm | Reply
  31. DMC:

    root@host:/home/elusernamo# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync

    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 72.6575 s, 14.8 MB/s

    …erm. that’s… interesting. 512MB plan.

    April 29, 2013 @ 6:54 pm | Reply
    • Emil Vals:

      Can you do cat /proc/cpu and paste here?

      April 29, 2013 @ 7:22 pm | Reply
      • DMC:

        They just kicked somebody off for abusing disk I/O – much better now.
        1GB plan, by the way:

        SHELLX : cat /proc/cpuinfo
        processor : 0
        vendor_id : GenuineIntel
        cpu family : 6
        model : 58
        model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz
        stepping : 9
        cpu MHz : 3391.766
        cache size : 8192 KB
        physical id : 0
        siblings : 8
        core id : 0
        cpu cores : 4
        apicid : 0
        initial apicid : 0
        fpu : yes
        fpu_exception : yes
        cpuid level : 13
        wp : yes
        flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms
        bogomips : 6783.53
        clflush size : 64
        cache_alignment : 64
        address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
        power management:

        Seems good to me.

        April 29, 2013 @ 7:37 pm | Reply
        • Emil Vals:

          So this is desktop computer hardware.

          Luke: What kind of RAID controller/disks are in this server?

          April 29, 2013 @ 8:24 pm | Reply
        • The hardware is all server, CPU’s are stable i7 3770 IvyBridge
          Which are used in both servers an some home computers. as we dont overload out cpus cope pretty well.

          April 29, 2013 @ 9:19 pm | Reply
    • Tomaz:

      I got 1073741824 bajtov (1,1 GB) prepisanih, 24,1802 s, 44,4 MB/s

      Looks like everybody is testing now :)

      April 29, 2013 @ 8:15 pm | Reply
      • Yes we had alot of orders an 60% of users end up running benchmark scripts, All seems to be holding up ok, We try to rate limit test files an such to allow genuine usage to continue.

        April 29, 2013 @ 8:19 pm | Reply
        • Tomaz:

          You know Simon. Boys never really grow up. When they get a new toy they need to push it to the limit. And you get a free stress test of system. Tomorrow everything will be back to normal :)

          April 29, 2013 @ 9:01 pm | Reply
  32. Hello all, just a quick thanks for the feedback. I also wanted to confirm as per Simon has stated, we are making the 30% discount cover the whole range of vps servers from the 512MB plan to the 4GB plans an all billing periods. Also a reminder that if you have any support issues please open a support ticket so we can help you. If you have any specific requirements, concerns or issues or any other queries please feel free to open a support ticket so that we can address it promptly for you.

    April 29, 2013 @ 8:10 pm | Reply
  33. Albert:

    Third time I try to post this (Akismet filters the comment)

    Excessive ping from Spain: pastebin DOT com/ghcQJEtc

    Any solution?

    April 29, 2013 @ 8:43 pm | Reply
    • Ping is purely by distance to server ping would increase, This does not reflect speed at all. HAving a 1ms ping woulnd’t mean a bullet fast speed, It would just mean its a server hosted on your ISP so very few hops needed.

      April 29, 2013 @ 8:56 pm | Reply
      • Albert:

        I know that, but there are only 3000km between mi city and Chisinau, so the ping should be at maximum 70ms.

        April 30, 2013 @ 5:08 pm | Reply
        • Bobby:

          I get ~70ms from edis.se to test-ip. It’s your isp, not these guys, so blame them.

          April 30, 2013 @ 6:50 pm | Reply
        • Bobby:

          i ment edis.es ^

          April 30, 2013 @ 6:50 pm | Reply
        • DanielM:

          70ms is huge for eu traffic. i get less than that to russia! Something seriously problematic.

          April 30, 2013 @ 7:10 pm | Reply
  34. Spirit:

    “Additional IPv6 are free of charge but require justification.”

    Maybe just short correction regarding this part from post above – as I was actually curious. It’s incorrect. They stick with “max” 2 IPs per package posted in offer. Maybe the are afraid of IPv6 depletion and decided to keep millions or whatever IPv6 addresses they have hoarded for themself? Kind of funny and sort of unique restriction, but well… it’s still ok as long other things will work well :-)

    April 30, 2013 @ 12:07 am | Reply
    • We have the restrictions stated on the VPS product page but if you require more and have a genuine reason please open a support ticket and we will look into it for you. It’s mainly to prevent abuse.

      April 30, 2013 @ 9:56 am | Reply
    • And only the 512mb package is subject to no additional Ips, This is purely to prevent someone having 20 ips an deciding to try use the vps to sell email marketing per ip an ends up causing aload of abuse. We have experienced it hence the recent rules.

      Theres drawbacks to doing a $1.75 offer an thats juggling abuse, Making sure we an’t giving an abuser loads of extras. IPv6 although in plenty supply, Still doesn’t mean its just given out 50 ip’s at a time is just.

      A perfect real world example Person A – “I want to send mass email spam but want alot of ips to avoid blacklists” Person then email spams using ipv6 only an has arange of ips banned, We know Ipv4 if a certain number of ips in a range is banned whole range flags up, Due to size of ipv6 we hope that isn’t similar case.

      But until we are fully confident on draw backs of such an useless an outdated protocol we will have restrictions. – P.S yeah i did say “Useless an outdated protocol” as it was invented back in the day an not has a way load of security issues an concerns surrounding it.

      You need ip’s for legit reasons im sure we wont mind adding them to a 512MB package

      April 30, 2013 @ 11:39 am | Reply
      • Spirit:

        They way you described issue it seems like you look at IPv6 from old IPv4 perspective. Get rid of that. IPv6 is not about number of addresses. /128 isn’t proper IPv6 allocation anyway as internet see /64 as one end user and it makes no difference between one and thousands /128 allocations to end users from this same /64 subnet. One /128 abused = complete /64 blacklisted as one end user allocation.

        Regarding requestiong additional IPv6 addresses. I asked for some more. Explained why. It was refused. Fine. Ticket closed. I am not angry or anything like that and I still hope that I decided right to pick you as one od my hosts (time will tell…) it’s just… it seems that you don’t understand IPv6 concept, that’s why I responded here. Things with individual IPv6 simply don’t work the same as with individual IPv4 and proper IPv6 allocation would be subnet instead individual /128 addresses so there’s really no sense to limit clients so strictly with two or so /128 in case from some reason they request some more.

        April 30, 2013 @ 10:31 pm | Reply
        • Oh Sorry if it sounded like i ment due to ipv4 shortage im applying same theory to ipv6, It isn’t that its i worked in security game for years and ipv6 has cropped up an only times it pops up is another flaw being found, It has so many flaws in the protocol just giving out tons of ips to users would ensure most are used for spam and a lot more vulnerable points left open to hit.

          But your right we should let the user decide on how widespread they want to use ipv6, So we have modified rules to allow more Ipv6 per package up to 10 for 512mb package. and up to 50 for 4gb package.

          Thanks for your input regarding ipv6, My personal stand point on it is its a useless protocol with to many security issues for anyone to want to use it, Only reason industry is going into ipv6 is just purely due to shortages of ipv4 not due to ipv6 being any more stable or secure over ipv4. But personal stand points on a subject bare no relevance as customers know what they want we can only listen an try accommodate. :)

          If you re-open old ticket we will have the new ips allocated.

          May 1, 2013 @ 5:54 pm | Reply
  35. salakis:

    So, played around with it for a while.
    So far so good. Ping here from Germany around 45ms, from another home connection in Czech Republic it’s around 28ms.
    Bandwidth is also great, wget to my Colorado Springs VPS has shown around 3.5 MB/s, to iperweb Milano VPS it averaged at around 6.5 MB/s and peaked at 10 MB/s.

    So, thank you for this offer, great value for this price!

    April 30, 2013 @ 9:02 am | Reply
    • Thank you for your feedback :) We will continue to aim to improve over time to only get better

      May 1, 2013 @ 6:00 pm | Reply
  36. Bobby:

    Coupon only available to new customers? :(

    April 30, 2013 @ 12:28 pm | Reply
    • As its a LEB exclusive, we have changed it just now to allow previous users to also one time use promo.

      April 30, 2013 @ 1:55 pm | Reply
      • Bobby:

        Thanks. Keep up the good work :)

        April 30, 2013 @ 4:55 pm | Reply
  37. Tomy King:

    WTF is this VPS? i bought vps 512MB this morning for a year and suspended . i leave maintenance and everything to my friend, and my friend didn’t even login on root. how is this possible ? ( i only checked solusvm control panel once or twice )

    Don’t even buy from these guys.. they are fraud.. damn..

    April 30, 2013 @ 3:22 pm | Reply
    • Tomy King:

      this case is resolved.. thx to VPScorner. a good service when resolving problem

      April 30, 2013 @ 3:56 pm | Reply
      • Yes VPS was suspended mostly as a counter measure to users data due to have 0 security in place was suffering bruteforce to ssh, Customer resolved it within minutes of being alerted of problem so all good.

        April 30, 2013 @ 7:19 pm | Reply
        • Bobby:

          How is this possible?

          April 30, 2013 @ 7:23 pm | Reply
      • Bobby:

        I ment starting to bruteforce right after container deployment from you, read wrong sorry.

        But why on earth publish your service without securing it first :/

        April 30, 2013 @ 7:29 pm | Reply
        • We dont control what security user puts in place, An we wont apply security above there container case it conflicts with security they do internally. An such restrictions may apply un needed rate limiting on clients as a whole. such as limiting connections per port per second.

          We do provide a secure image which users should use which is secured from most basic of attacks.

          April 30, 2013 @ 10:12 pm | Reply
        • Also note that we supply a secured image with lots of premade changes that the user can use as their OS. We have lots of users using it and it is highly recommended.

          May 1, 2013 @ 6:36 pm | Reply
  38. Moritz:

    I have a 512MB VPS and I really like the guys behind this project, they are very friendly and the support is good :) for this price you can’t say no :D

    April 30, 2013 @ 5:06 pm | Reply
  39. MiLa:

    nice offer
    although i would prefer KVM, any plans for KVM in future ?

    April 30, 2013 @ 6:12 pm | Reply
    • We are looking to expand into providing XEN Or KVM servers in the close future, We are not sure exactly when.

      April 30, 2013 @ 7:19 pm | Reply
  40. Tony Carter:

    DO NOT BUY – SCAMMERS.

    I placed a small order for one month of service using the discount code provided and had a problem logging in to the panel. I got a snarky response about not reading an email (which I never got).

    When I repsonded with images of proof of not getting the email/not being able to log in they deleted my account completely.

    Proof of purchase: http://i.imgur.com/GiQx2M0.png

    Then I got this email saying somebody logged into my account: http://i.imgur.com/8RfbsCN.png

    And now I get this when I try to reset my password: http://i.imgur.com/uhKHPsr.png

    If it seems to be to good to be true…it probably is. I’d advise staying away from these guys completely!

    April 30, 2013 @ 9:20 pm | Reply
    • I don’t know the details but when things like this happen it’s obvious that it’s going to be revealed so this isn’t something that has been done on purpose or with intent at our end as we would not risk our business over a $1.75 client. I’ve informed Simon and he will deal with this.

      April 30, 2013 @ 10:11 pm | Reply
    • This was an issue which after we had logs of access to solusvm, User was using an anonymouse email service which could of been blocking some emails, Although some did appear which is unusual for all from same address some to not appear, We did check it out an personally provided login to user which we verified “Hense the login alert” Which was a login done to verify the account logs in completely fine, After user was screaming scam while we was trying to find why he is having issue when noone else was, Maybe Proxy Or some local services blocking certain ports such as our old solusvm port 5353, and demanded refund, We issued refunded an terminated service, Those client accounts with 0 active services are purged automatically. Hense why account was not found afterwards, User requested refund and we issued refund within minutes. Sorry if it was so fast processed that you assumed it was deleted for no reason. We would of welcomed working with client to fix issue and applying credit for time it takes to fix bug as an apology this was made clear in tickets if bug occurs we will fix and credit at minimum 1/2 of month of invoice if not whole month invoice.

      Sorry for it to be abit of a confusion for you, When a client demands a refund, We tend to try respects clients wishes as we offer 72 refund policy as stated here on leb. So all we did was honor it an action refund without trying to badger user into staying. We feel user has end say in this matter an our action was just.

      April 30, 2013 @ 10:19 pm | Reply
      • Tony Carter:

        “User was using an anonymous email service which could of been blocking some emails, Although some did appear which is unusual for all from same address some to not appear”

        I check the spam messages as well and they weren’t from their. Also the service blocks some of your emails but not all…?

        “After user was screaming scam while we was trying to find why he is having issue when noone else was, Maybe Proxy Or some local services blocking certain ports such as our old solusvm port 5353, and demanded refund,”

        I said no such thing, I said I want it to be up so I’m not being charged for not having any service at all. I was having issues because I never received any email about the account and because I couldn’t log in even after you linked to the appropriate page and gave me my credentials once more.

        Then you deleted my account with no warning or notice. Is that how you do refunds? Not even an email or a support ticket update? Completely deleting an account so the user can’t even log in?

        May 1, 2013 @ 5:30 am | Reply
        • We confirmed the account worked fine so determined it was 100% an issue your end. We then issued you a refund extremely swiftly and you made it clear you would not be using us so as you had no services with us we terminated the account. If you have any additional concerns please open a ticket but if a user has no services with us after receiving a refund then yes, we can justify that for deleting your account as we were under the impression you would not be using it again. The 5353 port can be blocked by AVs sometimes etc. I don’t know all of the details but Simon seems to of covered it. I do appologize about you not being happy as for us it’s about the reputation and knowledge not the money which is why a $1 client gets treated the same as a $50 client. We jump when any client says jump and we help as much as we can.

          Kind Regards,

          Luke.

          May 1, 2013 @ 1:52 pm | Reply
    • Thanks for clearing that up Simon. In the future please open a support ticket to address any concerns with us. We are a genuine business and as you can see here on LEB we have excellent feedback and answer tickets swiftly which we often get complimented on. The service is cheap but we manage to cover costs and for us it’s more of a promotion exercise and getting our name out there so if it’s to good to be true for anyone it’s to good to be true for us at the fantastic response we’ve had, I’m very surprised.

      Thanks again @ everyone please do not hesitate to contact us RE any queries.

      April 30, 2013 @ 10:22 pm | Reply
  41. Phil:

    I tried signing up using that code and it said it was expired. I was trying to get the 2GP OpenVZ VPS

    May 1, 2013 @ 3:29 am | Reply
    • Hello,

      That’s odd. I will have simon look into this and fix it as soon as possible.

      Thanks.

      May 1, 2013 @ 11:07 am | Reply
  42. I can confirm that the coupon was primarily for April. As we completed over 100 sales and gained a further 4 server nodes in the process we have not continued this coupon as it was for April as per the LEB-APRIL indicator. A 30% loss was not viable long term but we have of course honored it for a good few days and have processed over 100 orders.

    Our prices are excellent anyway so I’m sure most of you won’t mind but we will of course have similar offers next month. If you have any issues or concerns please open a support ticket and we will answer as soon as possible.

    May 1, 2013 @ 1:25 pm | Reply
  43. Its saying now promo code LEB-APRIL expired

    May 1, 2013 @ 7:48 pm | Reply
  44. In the next month (most likely June) VPSCorner will be looking
    into providing a low end/budget KVM and/or Xen VPS packages.

    We will know more about the plans that we intend to release
    closer to the time when we decide to launch them.

    We also intend to expand into more locations and as always, we
    intend to improve our customer service beyond it’s already
    fantastic feedback. We also intend to release more offers
    that are exclusive to the LEB community.

    On a final note, VPSCorner would like to thank those that have
    tried our services and those that have posted reviews and have
    taken the time to let us know about any issues and/or bugs and
    ultimately worked with us to resolve them. Issues/bugs include
    the SolusVM panel probelm which arose due to our setup changes.

    As always, please open a ticket if you have any concerns or
    support queries and we will answer as soon as possible.

    Kind Regards,

    The VPSCorner Team.

    May 1, 2013 @ 9:17 pm | Reply
  45. Marvin:

    im having a 512mb box with them… the price is good 1,75 as for the speed is just so so (cant complain for that price)… im using it for private game emulator development… their support is nice… less then 30minutes reply… overall (8/10)

    May 2, 2013 @ 3:52 am | Reply
    • Thanks for the feedback. Remember that 512 is 50% core usage. Overall our boxes are solid and use i7 etc we also never ever oversell and constantly buy fresh nodes instead of overselling (one of our main selling points). Support wise, we aim to answer that fast constantly. Most are answered within minutes as if we are online ‘properly’ which is about 20+ hours a day then we answer within minutes or at most 1hr as you have experienced as we have multiple support staff. Some tickets take slightly longer with certain requests as only Simon can deal with them.

      Thanks again for the feedback.

      May 2, 2013 @ 9:13 am | Reply
  46. Dab:

    The promotion code entered has expired

    EU-MOLDOVA – 512MB OpenVZ VPS – Moldova

    :(

    May 2, 2013 @ 2:27 pm | Reply
  47. Tom:

    Good service, good pricing, fast responses to tickets. Can’t ask for much more in a provider. (V6 rDNS would be nice). 9/10! Will definitely be keeping them.

    May 13, 2013 @ 5:15 pm | Reply
    • Sorry for late reply as this is last months promo topic, We do suppose IPv6 RDNS :) Contact our support with your RDNS request and it will be applied.

      No point us issuing the IP’s if RDNS isn’t supported for them. :P

      We should of pointed it out on our FAQ its available, Our mistake we will amend FAQ in due course.

      May 17, 2013 @ 5:35 pm | Reply
  48. I just got the 1G package. Nothing to report right now. Everything has been excellent so far. I will have deploy my application to test things out though.

    June 30, 2013 @ 6:56 am | Reply
  49. See error in package OpenVZ – 512MB VPS, this charging $ 199.00

    July 19, 2013 @ 9:59 pm | Reply
    • This is because it is discontinued But because stupid whmcs system when we set to 0 stock when people cancel it adds stock back,

      Hense the price was put as something to stop orders. We phased out 512mb package it ran for an offer for over 2 months.

      This is an OLDDD offer hense if you check anywhere on website 512mb is no longer listed, Direct link cant be removed! as there is current 512mb packages assigned. – Blame whmcs for this.

      July 25, 2013 @ 9:50 am | Reply
  50. upstage:

    Dead pool?
    Main server points now to Prometeus website, VPS in .md went down earlier today…

    September 27, 2013 @ 9:48 am | Reply
    • Same thing for me. Hope everything is alright.

      September 28, 2013 @ 7:43 pm | Reply
    • VPS corner site is not working. No other way to reach to them. VPScorner is not replying to emails. All of my sites are down for last 4 days.
      Not recommended, these people are not at all professionals.
      Many times they claim that upgradation is going on while servers remain unreachable and we lose bunch of money to our clients.

      September 29, 2013 @ 2:31 am | Reply
  51. Been a few days now and all servers are still down… gonna try to get a refund from PayPal for the months I paid for in advance. This is a real disappointment, they said, or at least they ‘claimed’ that they just upgraded their hardware so i thought they were gonna be rock solid now :(

    September 29, 2013 @ 1:42 pm | Reply
    • Tomaz:

      The last email I got from them was like “Backup all data, as we have situation with our data center” or something like that.
      They were good but they had quite some down time :(

      September 30, 2013 @ 3:53 pm | Reply
  52. upstage:

    @Simon what’s happening exactly?

    October 4, 2013 @ 1:28 am | Reply

Leave a Reply

Some notes on commenting on LowEndBox:

  • Do not use LowEndBox for support issues. Go to your hosting provider and issue a ticket there. Coming here saying "my VPS is down, what do I do?!" will only have your comments removed.
  • Akismet is used for spam detection. Quoting webhostingtalk.com URL seems to get binned consistently here, but I do peek into the spam box frequently to publish those comments.
  • Use <pre>...</pre> to quote the output from your terminal/console, or consider using a pastebin service.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *