LowEndBox - Cheap VPS, Hosting and Dedicated Server Deals

BlueVM - "Birthday Promotion" $25/Year 512MB KVM in Buffalo or Los Angeles

bluevm It’s BlueVM’s birthday, and Justin is having celebrating with an exclusive party promotion. Happy Birthday guys from all of us at LowEndBox!

KVM2 – Birthday Special

OpenVZ3 – Birthday Special

  • 1024MB RAM
  • 2048MB Burst
  • 3 CPU Cores
  • 50GB Diskspace
  • 2000GB Bandwidth
  • 1Gbps Port Speed
  • 1 IPv4 Address
  • OpenVZ/HyperVM
  • $13.5 /6 Mo or $23 /Year
  • Los Angeles Order Link

BlueVM were founded in May 2011 and have been featured a handful of times. They recently came ninth in our 2013 Q1 top providers poll. KVM orders in Los Angeles are not automatically setup and may take up to 48 hours to process. KVM servers in Buffalo, NY and OpenVZ servers in Los Angeles are however instantly setup. Justin informs us that their special offers on OpenVZ can be transferred to any location. Los Angeles is just the most undersold location at present.

BlueVM accept payments via PayPal, Google Checkout and Bitcoin. According to their website, their servers primarily consist of the Intel E3-1240 with 32 GB of RAM and 4 x 1TB or 2TB drives in RAID10. More information is available on their FAQ page. IRC, VPN/Proxies and Adult content is allowed as well as Tor Middle Nodes. As usual, take a look at their Terms of Service before signing up.

Network Information:

Los Angeles, California
Test IPv4: 192.210.208.5
Test File: http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test

Buffalo, New York
Test IPv4: 192.210.215.2
Test File: http://s1.c12.ny.bluevm.com/100mb.test

268 Comments

  1. Thanks again Liam :)

    May 7, 2013 @ 10:48 pm | Reply
  2. t:

    Any chance of upgrading the BlueVM KVM in LA to 1Gbps? How much, if so?

    May 7, 2013 @ 10:59 pm | Reply
    • It is 1 Gbps, unfortunately it looks like Liam posted 100 Mbps instead. We’ll see if he can correct this above.

      May 7, 2013 @ 11:03 pm | Reply
      • Peter:

        Is just the KVM 1Gbps or is the OpenVZ 1Gbps as well?

        May 8, 2013 @ 2:44 am | Reply
    • It is 1Gbps :)

      We have PM’d Liam for correction.

      May 7, 2013 @ 11:06 pm | Reply
    • t:

      Awesome! Thanks.

      May 8, 2013 @ 12:07 am | Reply
    • All of them are 1GBps? Or is it just the LA one?

      May 8, 2013 @ 4:00 am | Reply
  3. happy birthday!

    May 7, 2013 @ 11:36 pm | Reply
    • Thank you, its a fantastic birthday :)

      May 7, 2013 @ 11:46 pm | Reply
      • this deal is making me think many times if i need additional idling vps =) its too tempting

        May 8, 2013 @ 1:06 am | Reply
        • Node:KVM1LA————–DD: 3.5 MB/S………My God…It changed history…….-_-!.

          May 10, 2013 @ 5:42 pm | Reply
  4. vaporlagoon:

    Happy birthday!
    Um.. Any chance your celebrations could trickle down by adding some stock to Reseller1 or 2? :P

    May 7, 2013 @ 11:49 pm | Reply
    • Possibly… send in a ticket and we’ll take care of you :)

      May 8, 2013 @ 7:13 am | Reply
      • vaporlagoon:

        Awesome! Ticket has been opened, it is #677026!

        May 8, 2013 @ 8:06 am | Reply
        • vaporlagoon:

          All set up. Thanks guys!

          May 9, 2013 @ 6:46 am | Reply
  5. Would you be interested in having your KVM VPS listed on Geekahost?
    http://geekahost.com/db/show.php

    May 8, 2013 @ 12:17 am | Reply
    • Sure :)

      May 8, 2013 @ 12:55 am | Reply
      • Sorry, perhaps I should have clarified :)
        I am already paying for your OpenVZ VPS, but if you want me to add a KVM VPS then please have a look here: http://geekahost.com/how-do-i-submit-our-vps-to-geekahost/

        Thanks :)

        May 8, 2013 @ 1:00 am | Reply
        • I thought you weren’t accepting VPS because it would be unbiased or something?

          But I’m sure we can.

          May 8, 2013 @ 11:27 am | Reply
        • It very quickly got to the point where not only this became very expensive, but also I need to log in to provider’s site and pay for another VPS literally every day, which after a while results in me spending much more time submitting payments than doing actual reviews :)

          May 8, 2013 @ 2:43 pm | Reply
        • Please send in a ticket then :)

          May 8, 2013 @ 3:35 pm | Reply
  6. happy birthday!

    May 8, 2013 @ 12:45 am | Reply
  7. Roph:

    Very happy with my BlueVM box :D This is tempting, but I just have no use for yet another LEB ><

    May 8, 2013 @ 1:09 am | Reply
  8. Duke:

    I am so lazy reading TOS :)

    Can I use OpenVZ3 for FTP backup server for my client websites?

    Thanks

    May 8, 2013 @ 1:33 am | Reply
  9. Can’t resist. Have to let my money go.
    Anyway, @Ishaq, why you need up to 48hrs to provision the LA node?

    May 8, 2013 @ 1:58 am | Reply
    • We’re waiting on Quadranet to install an SSD for disk cacheing and frankly I don’t want to tell people “listen I know you just bought your VPS, but its going down for an hour.” I’d rather just setup the VPS once they’re done. I’m told they’ll be doing the SSD install in about 1 – 2 hours.

      May 8, 2013 @ 3:03 am | Reply
      • CoolMoon:

        How about KVM in buffalo, same 1Gbps port and SSD Cached?

        May 8, 2013 @ 3:31 am | Reply
  10. Hope that this time you install some kind of DDOS protection. I would like to order one but the memory of last time haunts me.

    May 8, 2013 @ 3:57 am | Reply
    • Our KVM nodes average over 100 days of uptime (yes that includes network uptime).

      Our only “problem children” are our S1 nodes for openvz, which are for lower end clients. The smaller VPS tend to have far more problems in regards to DDOS, abuse, etc… thus our Blue3’s seen above would have 80+ days of uptime like the rest of our S3 servers.

      Either way uptime is important to us and we are doing our best to improve our services.

      May 8, 2013 @ 4:42 am | Reply
  11. peppr:

    KVM/SolusVM

    Am I reading this right? @BlueVM can you confirm if you use Solus for your KVM plans?

    May 8, 2013 @ 4:05 am | Reply
  12. Russell:

    Hey,

    I am trying to order and pay with bitcoins but there is no option on the checkout page, could you tell me how I can pay with bitcoins?

    Thanks!

    May 8, 2013 @ 5:29 am | Reply
    • We accept them manually. Send in a ticket and we’ll assist you with this.

      May 8, 2013 @ 7:18 am | Reply
  13. peppr:

    any reason why the LA speedtest file is pulling quite slow? I get around 100-240Kb/sec only

    May 8, 2013 @ 5:49 am | Reply
    • The speedtest is on a busy node with our low end clients, once the KVM LA is up, please PM me on LET for the test IP :)

      May 8, 2013 @ 3:37 pm | Reply
  14. Rather slow, isnt it?

    [root@athena] ~ #./testspeed http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    --2013-05-08 09:32:09--  http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    Resolving s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com... 192.210.208.5
    Connecting to s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com|192.210.208.5|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: `/dev/null'
    
    100%[==============================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600  352K/s   in 3m 45s
    
    2013-05-08 09:35:54 (456 KB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [104857600/104857600]
    
    [root@athena] ~ #./testspeed http://s1.c12.atl.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    --2013-05-08 09:49:46--  http://s1.c12.atl.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    Resolving s1.c12.atl.bluevm.com... 192.210.212.3
    Connecting to s1.c12.atl.bluevm.com|192.210.212.3|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: `/dev/null'
    
    100%[==============================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600  372K/s   in 3m 18s
    
    2013-05-08 09:53:04 (516 KB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [104857600/104857600]
    
    [root@athena] ~ #./testspeed http://s1.c12.il.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    --2013-05-08 09:55:03--  http://s1.c12.il.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    Resolving s1.c12.il.bluevm.com... 192.210.211.2
    Connecting to s1.c12.il.bluevm.com|192.210.211.2|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: `/dev/null'
    
    44% [=======================================================>                                                                       ] 46,346,319   241K/s  eta 3m 29s  ^C
    [root@athena] ~ #./testspeed http://ksprimary.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    --2013-05-08 09:58:03--  http://ksprimary.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    Resolving ksprimary.bluevm.com... 69.30.193.58
    Connecting to ksprimary.bluevm.com|69.30.193.58|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: `/dev/null'
    
    85% [===========================================================================================================>                   ] 89,235,623   378K/s  eta 51s     ^C
    [root@athena] ~ #./testspeed http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    --2013-05-08 10:11:39--  http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    Resolving s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com... 192.210.208.5
    Connecting to s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com|192.210.208.5|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: `/dev/null'
    
     8% [=========>                                                                                                                     ] 9,065,656    495K/s  eta 2m 52s  ^C
    [root@athena] ~ #./testspeed http://s1.c12.ny.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    --2013-05-08 10:12:08--  http://s1.c12.ny.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    Resolving s1.c12.ny.bluevm.com... 192.210.215.2
    Connecting to s1.c12.ny.bluevm.com|192.210.215.2|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: `/dev/null'
    
    100%[==============================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600  994K/s   in 2m 9s
    
    2013-05-08 10:14:17 (797 KB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [104857600/104857600]
    
    [root@athena] ~ #./testspeed https://panel.ssdvps.com:5656/100mb.bin
    --2013-05-08 10:28:28--  https://panel.ssdvps.com:5656/100mb.bin
    Resolving panel.ssdvps.com... 198.46.144.234
    Connecting to panel.ssdvps.com|198.46.144.234|:5656... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: `/dev/null'
    
    100%[==============================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 8.92M/s   in 11s
    
    2013-05-08 10:28:39 (9.26 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [104857600/104857600]
    
    [root@athena] ~ #./testspeed http://208.117.11.114/100mb.test
    --2013-05-08 10:28:51--  http://208.117.11.114/100mb.test
    Connecting to 208.117.11.114:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: `/dev/null'
    
    100%[==============================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 5.24M/s   in 25s
    
    2013-05-08 10:29:16 (4.05 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [104857600/104857600]
    
    [root@athena] ~ #^C
    [root@athena] ~ #./testspeed http://208.117.11.114/100mb.test
    --2013-05-08 10:29:20--  http://208.117.11.114/100mb.test
    Connecting to 208.117.11.114:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: `/dev/null'
    
    100%[==============================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 4.22M/s   in 24s
    
    2013-05-08 10:29:44 (4.25 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [104857600/104857600]
    
    May 8, 2013 @ 6:17 am | Reply
    • That does seem a bit slow, send in a ticket and we’ll take a look.

      May 8, 2013 @ 7:15 am | Reply
    • Those tests except the last two, are done on your official test files. The last two are test files of another host. The tests were done on another VPS (Will), and cross checked with yet another one (UGVPS). The test results are similiar. It doesnt look like a 1Gbps connection.

      May 8, 2013 @ 7:22 am | Reply
    • live:

      I / O performance is what? This Los Angeles?

      May 8, 2013 @ 9:19 am | Reply
      • I don’t know. I haven’t signed up for a plan yet. The tests show download speeds from their servers.

        May 8, 2013 @ 2:52 pm | Reply
  15. thekreek:

    Is it possible to order the OpenVZ3 – Birthday
    Special in Kansas and also get direct admin for free?

    May 8, 2013 @ 8:11 am | Reply
    • Yes it is.

      May 8, 2013 @ 8:23 am | Reply
      • Fritz:

        How to do that?

        May 8, 2013 @ 10:41 am | Reply
        • Fritz:

          Hi,

          I have submitted a ticket #166640.
          Hopefully I’m on the right track. :)

          May 8, 2013 @ 4:09 pm | Reply
      • EricS:

        Kansas Or Atlanta, would like to know how to do that too.

        May 8, 2013 @ 11:00 am | Reply
        • @Fritz

          After ordering the special in California, request a move to Kansas and a free DA license.

          @EricS

          I’m afraid free DA is not available in ATL, only Kansas City.

          May 8, 2013 @ 11:31 am | Reply
        • EricS:

          Ordered, Thanks for the info. Hopefully the tsunami of orders dies down soon, and I get moved over to Kansas.

          May 8, 2013 @ 5:54 pm | Reply
  16. wlanboy:

    Looks like they are quite overwhelmed by the crowd of new customers.
    kvm.bluevm.com control panel is quite slow.

    May 8, 2013 @ 9:10 am | Reply
  17. happy birthday!

    May 8, 2013 @ 10:11 am | Reply
  18. wget http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    –2013-05-08 14:31:46– http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    Resolving s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com… 192.210.208.5
    Connecting to s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com|192.210.208.5|:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: â100mb.test.1â

    9% [==> ] 9,779,976 420K/s eta 4m 28s

    ??

    wget http://s1.c12.ny.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    –2013-05-08 14:32:59– http://s1.c12.ny.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    Resolving s1.c12.ny.bluevm.com… 192.210.215.2
    Connecting to s1.c12.ny.bluevm.com|192.210.215.2|:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: â100mb.test.2â

    13% [====> ] 14,593,608 796K/s eta 1m 53s

    arent these TOOO slow for a 1gbps connection?

    May 8, 2013 @ 10:33 am | Reply
    • Our lines are/were probably busy, looking into this now.

      May 8, 2013 @ 11:32 am | Reply
      • So if your lines are congested then speeds are like this on all the locations?

        May 8, 2013 @ 2:59 pm | Reply
        • Speedtest is on a busy node, try another IP from our about us page :)

          May 8, 2013 @ 3:38 pm | Reply
        • Atlanta:
          wget http://s1.c12.atl.bluevm.com/100mb.test
          –2013-05-08 20:00:48– http://s1.c12.atl.bluevm.com/100mb.test
          Resolving s1.c12.atl.bluevm.com… 192.210.212.3
          Connecting to s1.c12.atl.bluevm.com|192.210.212.3|:80… connected.
          HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
          Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
          Saving to: â100mb.test.4â

          10% [===> ] 11,147,879 611K/s eta 2m 29s

          LA:

          wget http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test
          –2013-05-08 20:01:48– http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test
          Resolving s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com… 192.210.208.5
          Connecting to s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com|192.210.208.5|:80… connected.
          HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
          Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
          Saving to: â100mb.test.5â

          2% [> ] 2,923,696 422K/s eta 4m 24s

          Chicago:
          wget http://s1.c12.il.bluevm.com/100mb.test
          –2013-05-08 20:02:29– http://s1.c12.il.bluevm.com/100mb.test
          Resolving s1.c12.il.bluevm.com… 192.210.211.2
          Connecting to s1.c12.il.bluevm.com|192.210.211.2|:80… connected.
          HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
          Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
          Saving to: â100mb.test.6â

          33% [===========> ] 34,605,424 1.10M/s eta 60s

          Kansas:

          wget http://ksprimary.bluevm.com/100mb.test
          –2013-05-08 20:03:34– http://ksprimary.bluevm.com/100mb.test
          Resolving ksprimary.bluevm.com… 69.30.193.58
          Connecting to ksprimary.bluevm.com|69.30.193.58|:80… connected.
          HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
          Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
          Saving to: â100mb.test.7â

          6% [=> ] 7,012,391 654K/s eta 2m 49s

          Dallas:

          wget http://s1.c12.tx.bluevm.com/100mb.test
          –2013-05-08 20:04:07– http://s1.c12.tx.bluevm.com/100mb.test
          Resolving s1.c12.tx.bluevm.com… 192.210.214.2
          Connecting to s1.c12.tx.bluevm.com|192.210.214.2|:80… connected.
          HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
          Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
          Saving to: â100mb.test.8â

          6% [=> ] 7,264,343 686K/s eta 1m 57s

          Buffalo:
          wget http://s1.c12.ny.bluevm.com/100mb.test
          –2013-05-08 20:04:45– http://s1.c12.ny.bluevm.com/100mb.test
          Resolving s1.c12.ny.bluevm.com… 192.210.215.2
          Connecting to s1.c12.ny.bluevm.com|192.210.215.2|:80… connected.
          HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
          Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
          Saving to: â100mb.test.9â

          8% [==> ] 9,061,312 795K/s eta 1m 42s

          tested ALL of your speedtest. Everyone is TOO slow.

          May 8, 2013 @ 4:05 pm | Reply
  19. your your:

    View Ticket #463636 please look it.

    May 8, 2013 @ 11:08 am | Reply
    • Tickets are taking longer to get a reply due to the amount in the queue.

      May 8, 2013 @ 1:40 pm | Reply
  20. David:

    On KVM can I use 100% CPU nonstop?

    May 8, 2013 @ 12:40 pm | Reply
    • For what?

      May 8, 2013 @ 1:43 pm | Reply
      • David:

        Legal. To calculating some math things.

        May 8, 2013 @ 3:30 pm | Reply
        • As long as it doesn’t affect other clients on the machine you should be fine.

          May 8, 2013 @ 3:38 pm | Reply
  21. Albert:

    Can I have 1 CPU Core in OpenVZ3 but without having to worry about using too much CPU time? I’m not talking about using 100% CPU all the time, but of not being terminated due to high CPU usage during peak hours.

    May 8, 2013 @ 2:02 pm | Reply
    • I guess so, but we don’t terminate anyway.. we shutdown or suspend first if abuse is detected.

      May 8, 2013 @ 2:40 pm | Reply
      • Albert:

        Suspended, shutdown or terminated for me it’s the same, because it means having a website/service not available.

        Uncertain availability is the worst enemy of a startup project, as you may know.

        May 8, 2013 @ 3:10 pm | Reply
        • Hm, right.

          Well as long as it doesn’t affect other customers we’ll turn a blind eye.

          May 8, 2013 @ 3:16 pm | Reply
      • wlanboy:

        Do I get any notice about “you are using too much CPU”? Or just a “oh my vps is not reachable so they might have shutdown it…”

        May 8, 2013 @ 4:46 pm | Reply
        • If you’re abusing too much, like if the loads reach 20+ we will shutdown the container and email/notice you.

          May 8, 2013 @ 5:55 pm | Reply
  22. johnlth93:

    Can i use for VPN on KVM/OVZ

    May 8, 2013 @ 2:37 pm | Reply
  23. JDHarm:

    How long before I receive my IP for the OpenVZ VPS I ordered?

    May 8, 2013 @ 2:46 pm | Reply
    • Should be instant, please open a ticket if it didn’t happen for you.

      May 8, 2013 @ 3:39 pm | Reply
  24. Duke:

    Very tempting but LA looks soooo slow.. :(

    This is from Phoenix.

    wget http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    –2013-05-08 10:53:41– http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    Resolving s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com… 192.210.208.5
    Connecting to s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com|192.210.208.5|:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: â100mb.testâ

    13% [====> ] 13,786,136 550K/s eta 2m 59s

    May 8, 2013 @ 2:56 pm | Reply
    • All test servers are slow for me:

      wget http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test
      –2013-05-08 18:57:34– http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test
      Resolving s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com… 192.210.208.5
      Connecting to s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com|192.210.208.5|:80… connected.
      HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
      Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
      Saving to: â100mb.test.3â

      9% [==> ] 9,640,512 348K/s eta 3m 44s

      May 8, 2013 @ 2:58 pm | Reply
    • My results posted above are similiar. Instead of 1Gbps, I cant even get 10Mbps on any of the test files. At least they’re honest enough to post correct test files.

      May 8, 2013 @ 3:01 pm | Reply
  25. Adam:

    Personal proxies allowed?

    May 8, 2013 @ 3:07 pm | Reply
  26. Mark:

    Couldn’t resist one of each. The Buffalo KVM comes with every conceivable ISO to install from so for now I went for Windows Server 2008 (activated using my own genuine key, no keys provided obviously). Instantly provisioned and runs pretty quickly, good transfer speeds.

    The LA OpenVZ was also instantly provisioned but has no IP address! I can access it via the Java console but it has no network access.

    Ticket opened 2 hours ago (ticket #441688) but no response as yet. A little frustrating.

    May 8, 2013 @ 3:26 pm | Reply
    • We apologize for the wait, will look into your IP issue immediately :)

      May 8, 2013 @ 3:42 pm | Reply
  27. JDHarm:

    How behind are you on the tickets? I’d like to get some action on mine.

    May 8, 2013 @ 3:27 pm | Reply
    • Not very behind, should all be responded to in a while.

      We can only apologize, we’re a budget provider and getting hundreds and hundreds of orders as well as answering tickets is not an easy task.

      Please bear with us :)

      May 8, 2013 @ 3:41 pm | Reply
  28. peppr:

    You guys have KVM at kansas location as well?

    May 8, 2013 @ 4:51 pm | Reply
  29. JDHarm:

    Ticket: #904643

    I still have no IP address.

    May 8, 2013 @ 4:59 pm | Reply
    • Mark:

      Me neither.

      May 8, 2013 @ 5:00 pm | Reply
      • I’d also appreciate if everyone could be patient with support tickets.

        We have almost 200 in the queue. We’re human too you know :)

        May 8, 2013 @ 5:53 pm | Reply
    • We’ll have IPs soon, pool went dry.

      You can request credit of a few hours if you want.

      May 8, 2013 @ 5:51 pm | Reply
  30. Natt:

    all promotion prices are recurring ? or next billing you may adjust the price ?

    May 8, 2013 @ 6:34 pm | Reply
    • selten98:

      They are recurring untill you decide to get rid of the VPS

      May 9, 2013 @ 7:26 am | Reply
  31. Update:

    We have a new block for LA OpenVZ, if you were provisioned without an IP check your control panel in a few minutes, you will have your purchased IPs assigned.

    May 8, 2013 @ 6:41 pm | Reply
    • Albert:

      While ordering, it became out of stock :(

      May 8, 2013 @ 6:46 pm | Reply
    • t:

      I know you guys were waiting on the LA KVM nodes to have the SSDs installed — any update on this? Not in a rush, just wondering when I can expect to be provisioned.

      May 8, 2013 @ 7:28 pm | Reply
      • Machine just came online, we’re setting up and will provision shortly.

        ETA 1 hour, do you have a ticket ID?

        May 8, 2013 @ 7:40 pm | Reply
        • john:

          any plan to add more KVM LA stock?

          May 8, 2013 @ 8:07 pm | Reply
        • t:

          Nope, didn’t file a ticket. Order ID is 2986644871.

          May 8, 2013 @ 8:10 pm | Reply
        • @john

          Ticket if you want an order.

          @t

          Alright, will provision.

          May 8, 2013 @ 8:15 pm | Reply
        • john:

          will do.

          May 8, 2013 @ 8:34 pm | Reply
  32. Steve:

    Hi would I be able to pay and upgrade to 1 gig of ram on the KVM deal ? Thanks

    May 8, 2013 @ 7:30 pm | Reply
    • selten98:

      From what I heard you could buy 2 KVM’s from the offer and have them be merged

      May 9, 2013 @ 7:24 am | Reply
  33. Seraphin69:

    Hmmm would have been a nice OZ deal if it was on east coast for me ! ^^

    I’ll wait longer :-p

    May 8, 2013 @ 7:43 pm | Reply
    • selten98:

      “Justin informs us that their special offers on OpenVZ can be transferred to any location.” Apparently you can have it on the east coast as well.

      May 9, 2013 @ 7:45 am | Reply
      • Seraphin69:

        True but out of stock :(

        May 9, 2013 @ 10:18 pm | Reply
  34. john:

    its a shame because i am from west canada and i am getting 300KB/s to the california bluevm server…

    while my current ATL server from you guys can barely hit 200KB/s from the california server….

    May 8, 2013 @ 8:56 pm | Reply
    • Have you tried other IPs?

      That test file is being downloaded a lot.

      May 8, 2013 @ 8:58 pm | Reply
      • ishaq , the problem is the same with ALL the ip’s , i think you should check it

        May 8, 2013 @ 9:22 pm | Reply
        • I am starting to think it’s your connection, not ours.

          May 9, 2013 @ 12:23 pm | Reply
  35. Vince:

    Are you guys having issues in Atlanta at the moment?

    May 8, 2013 @ 9:01 pm | Reply
  36. bobdz:

    Hi

    Are we able to install Windows Server 2008 on the Openvz/HyperVM plan?

    Thank you for your assistance!

    May 8, 2013 @ 9:48 pm | Reply
  37. Ruriko:

    aww kvm2 is out of stock :(

    May 8, 2013 @ 10:21 pm | Reply
    • Send in a ticket and we’ll add you an order, we have stock.. just not on the site at this time.

      May 8, 2013 @ 10:47 pm | Reply
  38. Any disappointment? I can help with the clearance. :)

    May 8, 2013 @ 10:35 pm | Reply
  39. Bobby:

    Nice offer, had to grab a NY KVM.

    Im sure its being DD if/of’d to hell and serverbearcave raped now, but performance has been nothing but good during my setup.

    Congrats and keep it up :)

    May 8, 2013 @ 11:55 pm | Reply
  40. ByAnz12:

    can you process my ticket?

    #959472 and #911829

    thanks before

    May 9, 2013 @ 2:18 am | Reply
  41. Fritz:

    Kansas location is very slow here. Well that worth the money.
    Anyway, I’m still experiencing problem with DA.
    Thanks again for your support. :)

    May 9, 2013 @ 3:00 am | Reply
    • selten98:

      Kansas location has never been fast in terms of download speed. It’s 100Mb/s and a full node (I thought). So it’s never going to hit 10MB/s speeds.

      May 9, 2013 @ 7:21 am | Reply
    • What’s the problem with DA? please open a ticket, we’ll sort it out.

      As for Kansas, it’s on 100Mb/s, and it depends where in the world you are.

      May 9, 2013 @ 12:17 pm | Reply
      • Fritz:

        Hi Ishaq,

        Same ticket number (#166640). It has been idling for almost 12 hours.
        I can understand load at your side, so I will wait.

        Anyway, my ticket only need a little more touch. Thanks again.

        May 9, 2013 @ 1:17 pm | Reply
  42. Sonic:

    grab la kvm and waiting for vps info :) happy birthday!

    May 9, 2013 @ 5:34 am | Reply
  43. Calimansi:

    I really want to get an LA KVM, but the speeds are so slow…

    May 9, 2013 @ 9:24 am | Reply
    • peppr:

      bluevm LA benchmark

      CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz
      Number of cores : 3
      CPU frequency : 3058.177 MHz
      Total amount of ram : 2048 MB
      Total amount of swap : 0 MB
      System uptime : 4 min,
      Download speed from CacheFly: 15.5MB/s
      Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 24.2MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 36.2MB/s
      Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 11.1MB/s
      Download speed from i3d.net, NL: 8.07MB/s
      Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 7.72MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 7.08MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 48.2MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 91.7MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 17.4MB/s
      I/O speed : 178 MB/s

      May 9, 2013 @ 10:02 am | Reply
      • calimansi:

        Why do my results look like this:

        wget http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test
        –2013-05-09 20:38:12– http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test
        Resolving s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com (s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com)… 192.210.208.5
        Connecting to s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com (s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com)|192.210.208.5|:80… connected.
        HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
        Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
        Saving to: `100mb.test’

        6% [=> ] 6,724,240 366K/s eta 4m 29s ^C

        PING 192.210.208.5 (192.210.208.5) 56(84) bytes of data.
        64 bytes from 192.210.208.5: icmp_req=1 ttl=62 time=0.173 ms
        64 bytes from 192.210.208.5: icmp_req=2 ttl=62 time=0.177 ms
        64 bytes from 192.210.208.5: icmp_req=3 ttl=62 time=0.160 ms
        64 bytes from 192.210.208.5: icmp_req=4 ttl=62 time=0.150 ms
        64 bytes from 192.210.208.5: icmp_req=5 ttl=62 time=0.124 ms
        64 bytes from 192.210.208.5: icmp_req=6 ttl=62 time=0.160 ms
        64 bytes from 192.210.208.5: icmp_req=7 ttl=62 time=0.125 ms
        64 bytes from 192.210.208.5: icmp_req=8 ttl=62 time=0.125 ms
        64 bytes from 192.210.208.5: icmp_req=9 ttl=62 time=0.125 ms
        64 bytes from 192.210.208.5: icmp_req=10 ttl=62 time=0.120 ms

        May 9, 2013 @ 4:40 pm | Reply
        • calimansi:

          My ip is 192.210.xxx.xxx. The speed should be great, right?

          May 9, 2013 @ 5:04 pm | Reply
    • See the benchmark below.

      May 9, 2013 @ 12:17 pm | Reply
  44. Tim:

    I hope it restocks soon :(

    May 9, 2013 @ 1:37 pm | Reply
  45. Kurt:

    Ticket #: 904643

    Can you move me this morning off of Atlanta, Pretty Please?

    May 9, 2013 @ 2:08 pm | Reply
  46. iRan:

    21 hours after a BTC transaction and still not processed..
    Ticket #117533

    May 9, 2013 @ 3:57 pm | Reply
    • iRan:

      Never mind, it’s passing along while the parent comment is awaiting moderation :)

      May 9, 2013 @ 5:30 pm | Reply
  47. Raqs:

    how can credit be added?

    May 9, 2013 @ 4:41 pm | Reply
  48. Hover:

    Can you clarify, 1G guaranteed, 2G burstable, means you can use up to 3G memory time to time, or 2G is the maximum? What can you see about the memory if using “top” command, like what should be the number for Mem: xxx total?

    May 9, 2013 @ 6:01 pm | Reply
    • Albert:

      Total 2GB.

      May 9, 2013 @ 6:05 pm | Reply
      • selten98:

        2GB at times. You can’t always use 2GB. If you need a bit more memory, then it’s available, but you may not constantly use more than 1 GB memory.

        May 10, 2013 @ 9:17 am | Reply
  49. just bought KVM:

    LA KVM
    root@:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 83.2685 s, 12.9 MB/s

    May 10, 2013 @ 7:33 am | Reply
    • selten98:

      if IO is bad they always tell you to raise a ticket, someone is probably abusing IO.

      May 10, 2013 @ 8:41 am | Reply
      • selten98:

        Also, enable virtio drivers everywhere. This makes IO a whole lot faster.

        May 10, 2013 @ 8:44 am | Reply
    • Please also note that a lot of people must be doing tests and benchmarks, it will restore itself soon.

      May 10, 2013 @ 11:41 am | Reply
      • just bought KVM:

        root@:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
        16384+0 records in
        16384+0 records out
        1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 232.909 s, 4.6 MB/s

        May 10, 2013 @ 1:30 pm | Reply
  50. Node:KVM1LA————–DD: 3.5 MB/S…………………

    My friend said BLUEVM is a trash……………

    May 10, 2013 @ 5:27 pm | Reply
  51. upgrade:

    can i upgrade my yearly plan with this?

    May 10, 2013 @ 5:39 pm | Reply
  52. There was abuse on the node. We expected this, it’s being dealt with guys.

    May 10, 2013 @ 6:12 pm | Reply
    • just bought KVM:

      root@:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
      16384+0 records in
      16384+0 records out
      1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 70.9823 s, 15.1 MB/s

      May 10, 2013 @ 6:31 pm | Reply
    • just bought KVM:

      root@:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
      16384+0 records in
      16384+0 records out
      1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 74.9937 s, 14.3 MB/s

      May 10, 2013 @ 6:52 pm | Reply
      • iRan:

        1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 12.2669 s, 87.5 MB/s
        On Buffalo KVM

        May 10, 2013 @ 8:04 pm | Reply
      • Fixed.

        May 10, 2013 @ 10:50 pm | Reply
        • LEIHAN:

          Ticket #997353 . you Suspended my vps ,Suspension Reason: Disk abuse! fix?

          May 11, 2013 @ 11:49 am | Reply
        • @LEIHAN

          Fix what? don’t abuse the disk.

          May 11, 2013 @ 5:49 pm | Reply
  53. thekreek:

    Everybody don’t be so impatient, normally when a promotion comes out everybody hits the nodes with testing.

    Wait 1 or 2 days, and the activity in the node will normalize. If everybody hammers the I/O test at the same time, we always end up with crappy results.

    I’m no employee from BlueVM just another customer.

    May 10, 2013 @ 6:57 pm | Reply
    • just bought KVM:

      This KVM, not Openvz.

      May 10, 2013 @ 7:07 pm | Reply
      • vaporlagoon:

        Still a VIRTUAL private server.

        May 10, 2013 @ 8:27 pm | Reply
  54. ChrisM:

    BlueVm has an Awesome deal on dedicated servers too!. I just grabbed the last 4GB one though, sorry. :)

    May 10, 2013 @ 8:05 pm | Reply
  55. Update: LA & NY KVM customers should have over 100MB/s IO now.

    May 10, 2013 @ 10:49 pm | Reply
    • just bought KVM:

      I can confirm that;
      root@:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
      16384+0 records in
      16384+0 records out
      1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 5.61404 s, 191 MB/s

      May 10, 2013 @ 11:01 pm | Reply
    • @Ishaq,
      Please help with ticket #639341,
      Thanks,

      May 11, 2013 @ 3:16 am | Reply
    • LEIHAN:

      Ticket #997353 please active my vps, i have move my date to this vps, now can’t vistor,because my vps Suspended. my vps only a blog. http://www.23to.com

      May 11, 2013 @ 11:51 am | Reply
  56. RobC:

    I tried to order but your website says you’re out of stock.
    Any more stock available in L.A. any time soon?

    May 11, 2013 @ 1:48 am | Reply
  57. grayfuz:

    @Ishaq, any chance of extra openvz?

    May 11, 2013 @ 4:00 am | Reply
  58. Steffen:

    Any chance to get a KVM3 with 1024 Ram in Buffalo? Seems to be booked out.

    May 11, 2013 @ 5:05 am | Reply
    • @Steffen – Open a ticket and we’ll get you setup.

      May 11, 2013 @ 7:10 am | Reply
      • LEIHAN:

        i buy you kvm la $25/year ,when i move data to this new kvm, you Suspended my vps ,Suspension Reason: Disk abuse! i copy data is only 1m/s,why Disk abuse?

        May 11, 2013 @ 11:40 am | Reply
        • cache:

          don`t buy BlueVM this vps is garbage

          May 11, 2013 @ 1:17 pm | Reply
        • @LEIHAN

          Disk abuse, yes. Don’t abuse the disk then?

          @cache

          Your comments are not needed, don’t even know who you are.

          May 11, 2013 @ 5:46 pm | Reply
  59. cache:

    This service is very garbage
    Suspension vps because install windows

    May 11, 2013 @ 1:16 pm | Reply
    • LEIHAN:

      why you know i is cache?

      May 11, 2013 @ 2:04 pm | Reply
    • ChrisM:

      Was it a legal copy of windows? They are advertising Linux vm’s not windows. :)

      BlueVM is not responsible for copy-right infringements caused by what the Customer hosted on BlueVM’s servers.

      BlueVM may at it’s discretion view client files in an attempt to determine the legality of the client’s usage if the client’s usage appears suspicious or abusive in nature. If the client’s files are determined to be of an illegal nature or the client’s VPS accounts are found to be abusing the VPS node’s resources BlueVM may suspend, terminate or delete the client’s VPS. These actions include, but are not limited to:

      IO Abuse
      Network abuse
      CPU abuse
      Memory abuse

      May 11, 2013 @ 3:35 pm | Reply
      • nbi:

        I Only install windows and do windows update bluevm Suspension my vps reason is Disk abuse
        The windows image file can chose on control plan

        Submit Ticket they response
        Installing Windows on a KVM with 512MB RAM causes Windows to abuse the disk, we no longer allow Windows on 512MB RAM, so you have 2 options. 1. Upgrade RAM to 1GB+, or re-install with Linux distro.

        THIS IS NOT Birthday Promotion IT Birthday Fraud

        May 11, 2013 @ 4:13 pm | Reply
        • @nbi – We had a bunch of users signup, install windows on 512 MB of RAM and their services proceeded to begin swapping with the disk anywhere from 100 – 200 times per minute. You can’t fault us for trying to protect other users by preventing windows from bashing the disks in because you didn’t setup your services with enough RAM.

          As per microsoft’s website:
          Windows 7: 1 gigabyte (GB) RAM (32-bit) or 2 GB RAM (64-bit)
          Windows 2003 Server: 512 MB (bare minimum) or 1 GB recommended
          Windows 2008 Server: 512 MB (bare minimum) or 2 GB recommended

          If you want we can unsuspend your VPS and you can remove your page file and that should solve the problem.

          May 11, 2013 @ 7:07 pm | Reply
    • @cache Installing Windows and abusing the disk is not tolerated.

      May 11, 2013 @ 5:47 pm | Reply
      • just bought KVM:

        would you define “disk abuse” ?
        1. is moving files to your node “abuse”?
        2. is running DD test “abuse” ?
        3. So can’t run test, can’t transfer any files, what’d you suggest to do with your vps?

        May 11, 2013 @ 5:56 pm | Reply
        • @just bought KVM: – We had a bunch of users signup, install windows on 512 MB of RAM and their services proceeded to begin swapping with the disk anywhere from 100 – 200 times per minute.

          May 11, 2013 @ 6:58 pm | Reply
  60. Happy birthday and thanks for the vps. I have bought a Ny kvm.

    May 11, 2013 @ 2:04 pm | Reply
  61. zerofj:

    Feeling cheated, purchased KVM 512M, was told can not use Windows, there are two options, an increase of $ 25 to upgrade to 1G RAM, 2, replace LINXU system.

    May 11, 2013 @ 2:12 pm | Reply
    • @zerofj – Its probably a matter of how much your VPS was swapping. You’re welcome to try again, but a lot of the windows that were setup with this sale hit the disks 100+ times per second swapping.

      May 11, 2013 @ 6:56 pm | Reply
      • just bought KVM:

        i will just let it cool for about a week.
        Windows on 512 should work, but so tight, it will pull somebody else’s resources.
        but, file transfer should be o.k though, because in order to run stuff, for example, you need stuff.
        My 6 cents. Good Luck everybody!

        May 11, 2013 @ 8:40 pm | Reply
    • Ruriko:

      I think you should use windows server 2003 or xp cause it uses less ram

      May 12, 2013 @ 2:02 am | Reply
  62. Steffen:

    One should really not install Windows on a server, especially on a low end box. Linux is much superior in terms of stability, security, performance and usage.

    May 12, 2013 @ 6:41 am | Reply
    • Ruriko:

      windows server 2003 runs well on a low end box it only needs 256 ram

      May 12, 2013 @ 6:57 am | Reply
      • 1GB is recommended though, in case you install programs on windows.

        May 13, 2013 @ 12:48 pm | Reply
      • Steffen:

        Don’t we have 2013? You want to use a 10 year old OS exposed to the Internet?

        May 14, 2013 @ 2:30 pm | Reply
  63. im considering buying this plan.
    could you load FREEPBX or PBX in flash to the VPS ?

    May 12, 2013 @ 6:48 am | Reply
  64. DingYao:

    Can’t login to the KVM control panel! It constantly gives me a password error.

    May 12, 2013 @ 11:40 am | Reply
  65. leon:

    It’s all Out of Stock, are you bringing new servers online for this promo ?

    May 12, 2013 @ 8:24 pm | Reply
  66. skizoid:

    wait for new stock for KVM…

    May 13, 2013 @ 11:49 am | Reply
  67. Paul:

    Bitcoin mining allowed on kvm?

    May 13, 2013 @ 1:29 pm | Reply
  68. Jet:

    Is bitcoin miner allowed on kvm?

    May 13, 2013 @ 1:30 pm | Reply
  69. ChrisM:

    Ishaq, do you think you could have someone look at my ticket (291597). I am trying to get an update. Thanks!

    May 13, 2013 @ 3:14 pm | Reply
  70. happy birthday :D
    very interesting promotion, especially for los angeles location
    anyone can provide me some test files on los angeles node?

    don’t know why bluevm test files quite slow for me :confuse:

    root@vps:~# traceroute s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com
    traceroute to s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com (192.210.208.5), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
    1 host.colocrossing.com (198.23.xxx.131) 0.126 ms 0.016 ms 0.013 ms
    2 host.colocrossing.com (192.210.xxx.254) 0.769 ms 1.380 ms 1.988 ms
    3 192.210.208.5 (192.210.208.5) 0.120 ms 0.101 ms 0.160 ms
    root@vps:~# wget http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    –2013-05-13 21:49:53– http://s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com/100mb.test
    Resolving s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com… 192.210.208.5
    Connecting to s1.c12.ca.bluevm.com|192.210.208.5|:80… connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
    Saving to: `100mb.test.4′

    100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 194K/s in 10m 6s

    2013-05-13 22:00:00 (169 KB/s) – `100mb.test.4′ saved [104857600/104857600]

    root@vps:~# ./speedtest.py –share
    Retrieving speedtest.net configuration…
    Retrieving speedtest.net server list…
    Testing from ColoCrossing (192.210.193.151)…
    Selecting best server based on ping…
    Hosted by Internode (Los Angeles, CA) [0.70 km]: 50.465 ms
    Testing download speed………………………………….
    Download: 539.75 Mbit/s
    Testing upload speed…………………………………………..
    Upload: 56.74 Mbit/s
    Share results: http://www.speedtest.net/result/2705602785.png
    root@vps:~#

    May 13, 2013 @ 6:41 pm | Reply
  71. ken:

    I think Bluevm is a cheater. really sluggish speed…. stay away from this cheap guy

    May 14, 2013 @ 7:19 am | Reply
  72. Nick:

    This post should be closed considering this was first come, first serve and they’re all sold out and not going to be adding any more…

    May 16, 2013 @ 9:09 pm | Reply
    • Fritz:

      You can still order it via tickets.

      May 17, 2013 @ 9:08 am | Reply
      • Nick:

        No, you can’t. I opened a ticket and they plain out told me that this was first come first serve and the promotion is over.

        May 17, 2013 @ 3:42 pm | Reply
        • perennate:

          Well, what do you mean closed? Offers aren’t deleted (except End of Reality’s LOL).

          May 17, 2013 @ 4:37 pm | Reply
        • Nick:

          They could put a message saying “This promotion has now ended” and/or cross off the links so people know they’re out of stock.

          May 17, 2013 @ 4:47 pm | Reply
        • No, we can still add orders in LA.

          May 18, 2013 @ 11:18 pm | Reply
  73. just bought KVM::

    why bother?
    root@:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 111.51 s, 9.6 MB/s

    May 17, 2013 @ 4:44 pm | Reply
  74. Ruriko:

    if no one wants their KVM2 give it to me :)

    May 18, 2013 @ 12:41 am | Reply
  75. just bought KVM::

    Great Speed, if you want, let me have your email.
    Last login: Fri May 17 09:56:46 2013
    root@:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 64.7365 s, 16.6 MB/s

    May 18, 2013 @ 6:30 am | Reply
    • Nick:

      How much do you want for it?

      May 18, 2013 @ 9:13 pm | Reply
      • just bought KVM::

        full price

        May 18, 2013 @ 9:16 pm | Reply
        • Nick:

          Can you send me an email? It’s nick58 [at] gmail [dot] com

          May 18, 2013 @ 9:55 pm | Reply
        • Nick:

          Actually, cancel that. I don’t want to purchase your VPS.

          May 18, 2013 @ 10:03 pm | Reply
  76. Hello,

    What happened?

    I am running linux, and running apache+php+mysql, no high io, and my website just 100ips/per day, why suspended my vps?

    Others running windows, and have high io, why not suspended them?

    Why? Why? Why?

    May 19, 2013 @ 7:52 am | Reply
  77. The disk io always at 10-15M/s with dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync.

    I running linux and running a lite website, I did say nothing, bacause it is cheap.

    You did not to suspend running windows vps, why suspended me? I am no high io, no high Mbps. My website less 100ip/per day.

    So pity, I advice the new customer, don’t choice bluevm. No refund, and your vps will be suspended no email notice.

    May 19, 2013 @ 7:56 am | Reply
  78. Fritz:

    Hey, y box at Kansas is down.
    Even manage.bluevm.com is down.
    @Ishaq please look at it.

    May 19, 2013 @ 9:37 am | Reply
    • Fritz:

      It should be hey MY box at Kansas is down.
      Thanks

      May 19, 2013 @ 9:39 am | Reply
    • Jordan:

      Should be online now – still having issues?

      May 19, 2013 @ 11:53 am | Reply
      • Fritz:

        Nope still down here.
        Is the node being ddosed as well?

        May 19, 2013 @ 1:14 pm | Reply
  79. Disappointed:

    Good price, but suffered some major downtime within the first week. Decided to stay with my current VPS provider as they are more reliable – the higher price is worth it.

    May 19, 2013 @ 10:29 am | Reply
  80. BlueVM Blows:

    BlueVM is down in Buffalo AGAIN! This service sucks! I want my money back.

    May 19, 2013 @ 11:26 am | Reply
    • Shivanthi:

      They have a no refund policy. Alas, you get what you paid for, my friend.

      May 19, 2013 @ 11:49 am | Reply
    • Jordan:

      We are working with the data center to get NYKVM2 up. Looks like a disk issue.

      May 19, 2013 @ 11:53 am | Reply
  81. BlueVM Blows:

    Who cares if they have a refund policy. Paypal has buyer protection.

    May 19, 2013 @ 12:47 pm | Reply
    • Nick:

      No, they don’t. BlueVM is offering a service/intangible good which PayPal doesn’t cover under its buyer protection. You can still open a dispute against the seller and there’s no guarantee you’ll get a refund (unless you have a PayPal rep that sympathizes with you and will bend the rules a bit).

      May 19, 2013 @ 4:26 pm | Reply
  82. Umut:

    Their service totaly sucks!! Hard to get an explanation about downtime from the support. Not reliable for a business level hosting.

    May 19, 2013 @ 2:58 pm | Reply
  83. BlueVM Sucks:

    My VPS with BlueVM has been offline for 12 hours now. They don’t even send an email about it…

    May 19, 2013 @ 10:55 pm | Reply
  84. Vic:

    No, I am in LA.
    BlueVM said I have high I/O.
    But I running apache+php+mysql in debian 6 32 bit. My Website less 100ip/per day.
    The vps so slowly.
    I think my site cause I/O because his disk less 1M/s.

    May 19, 2013 @ 11:59 pm | Reply
  85. Vic:

    Save life, always bluevm.

    May 19, 2013 @ 11:59 pm | Reply
  86. SB:

    Are you still running any specials?

    Thanks.

    May 24, 2013 @ 5:20 am | Reply
  87. out of stock. i need OpenVZ3 – Birthday Special.

    Thanks

    May 28, 2013 @ 6:24 am | Reply
  88. Need an OPENVZ3 as well, when will you guys get more stock?

    May 28, 2013 @ 3:18 pm | Reply
  89. Ishaq:

    We have new stock right now for all those interested.

    June 10, 2013 @ 12:58 pm | Reply
  90. jimbob:

    do you have any 128 or 256 KVM available in NY, and if so, what is the price per year?

    June 10, 2013 @ 5:07 pm | Reply
  91. Hi,Bluevm. I want to buy KVM2 plans VPS, can you help me? Thank you.

    September 27, 2013 @ 12:11 pm | Reply

Leave a Reply

Some notes on commenting on LowEndBox:

  • Do not use LowEndBox for support issues. Go to your hosting provider and issue a ticket there. Coming here saying "my VPS is down, what do I do?!" will only have your comments removed.
  • Akismet is used for spam detection. Some comments may be held temporarily for manual approval.
  • Use <pre>...</pre> to quote the output from your terminal/console, or consider using a pastebin service.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *