LowEndBox - Cheap VPS, Hosting and Dedicated Server Deals

Poll: OpenVZ VPS, KVM VPS, Xen VPS or Other?

Tags: Date/Time: May 15, 2020 @ 8:06 am, by Jon Biloh

OpenVZ vs KVM vs Xen vs Other Cheap VPS

Welcome to our second-ever Poll on Low End Box! Last month we asked you what you use your VPS for and this month we are back with another question.

There are plenty of different VPS/Hypervisor technologies today, from the common OpenVZ, KVM, Xen, VMware, Hyper-V and so on. Do you prefer the high allocation of shared resources that OpenVZ provides? Or would you rather have dedicated resources akin to KVM and Xen? Or perhaps you prefer the enterprise-first approach of VMWare.

If you are looking for some more information prior to voting, a few years ago we wrote a comparison of OpenVZ, KVM and Xen and more recently we’ve highlighted some of the strengths of the OpenVZ and KVM architecture.

We want to know what you prefer. Remember to vote and then leave your thoughts in the comments below. Thanks for taking part in our Poll!

I'm Jon Biloh and I own LowEndBox and LowEndTalk. I've spent my nearly 20 year career in IT building companies and now I'm excited to focus on building and enhancing the community at LowEndBox and LowEndTalk.

7 Comments

  1. KVM Sure!

    May 15, 2020 @ 11:14 am | Reply
    • KVM is leading now with almost 75% of the votes. Very impressive.

      May 23, 2020 @ 8:34 pm | Reply
  2. nelgin:

    I’ve been happy with the openvz services that I’ve used, except you’re sometimes at the mercy of your provider. I found the clock was incorrect on a host that propagated down to my openvz container, there’s no way to using loop devices, from what research I did, so it’s impossible to mount a VFAT on disk file system. Fuse, unfortunately, doesn’t provide all the features of the real kernel drivers for the FS. ipsets didn’t work, not sure if that’s still the case. It’s also much cheaper to procure openvz services, it seems, due to the nature of the shared resource rather than dedicated that KVM offers. That said, if all things were equal in price and features, I’d go KVM every time.

    May 15, 2020 @ 1:05 pm | Reply
    • Agreed that OpenVZ has had its place in the market — and in some cases is still quite useful but with KVM options being so affordable today it’s hard to say there’s still a reason to consider OpenVZ.

      May 23, 2020 @ 8:35 pm | Reply
  3. KVM is dominating! We noticed the same, for every 30 KVM nodes we had 1 OpenVZ node, the demand for KVM eventually led us to discontinue future sales of OpenVZ.

    Here’s an awesome KVM VPS deal: https://my.racknerd.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=57

    May 15, 2020 @ 9:40 pm | Reply
  4. Karl:

    Yes KVM also recommended by SlickStack for easy scaling of high traffic WordPress, because resources are more controlled in the container. However many people don’t realize CPU is still technically “shared” in KVM and also can be over-committed (maybe like network is cheating you if dishonest).

    Even though KVM is scaling better, it still requires honest and skilled datacenter engineers. Ironic that some other containers can actually protect CPU resource better.

    Maybe something like “KVM 2.0” will be best.

    May 16, 2020 @ 12:31 am | Reply
  5. I was surprised to see KVM have such a big lead over the other options.

    Will be interesting to see the results as more votes come in. Already over 200 votes :)

    May 17, 2020 @ 11:39 am | Reply

Leave a Reply to nelgin Cancel reply

Some notes on commenting on LowEndBox:

  • Do not use LowEndBox for support issues. Go to your hosting provider and issue a ticket there. Coming here saying "my VPS is down, what do I do?!" will only have your comments removed.
  • Akismet is used for spam detection. Some comments may be held temporarily for manual approval.
  • Use <pre>...</pre> to quote the output from your terminal/console, or consider using a pastebin service.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *