After six months of hibernation: Nate, from Kazila, is back with two offers for LowEndBox readers.
KVM 512
| XEN 512
|
Austin, Texas based Kazila LLC have been featured five times before on LowEndBox, since their first post back in February 2011. I’ve just read through the last few offers from Kazila that we have featured and the vast majority (99%) are all very positive which is a good sign. IPv6 is still nowhere in sight but I suspect it is more their upstream providers fault than their own. Unlike many of the vps offers we feature in ‘New York’, these servers are actually located in New York City at the 121 Varick St facility in Manhattan. As ever, we would love to hear your feedback if you’re a customer.
They accept payments via Visa, Mastercard, American Express and PayPal. They offer a comprehensive 14-day money back guarantee and provide a 99% uptime guarantee. Tun/tap is enabled by default and IRC/mailing servers are strictly forbidden. For More information, you may want to have a read of their Terms of Service.
Network Information:
More information on their network and the datacenters they used can be found here.
New York, NY – Steadfast
Test IP: 69.162.169.197
10MB: http://69.162.169.197/10mb.dat
100MB: http://69.162.169.197/100mb.dat
Dallas, TX – GIPNetworks
Test IP: 67.210.247.252
10MB: http://67.210.247.252/10mb.dat
100MB: http://67.210.247.252/100mb.dat
Los Angeles, CA – Quadranet
Test IP: 96.44.140.218
10MB: http://96.44.140.218/10mb.dat
100MB: http://96.44.140.218/100mb.dat
Related Posts:
- How To Create a DNS Server On Ubuntu 18.04 - July 10, 2019
- How To Create a DNS Server On Debian Stretch - June 27, 2019
- How To Install and Use A Plex Media Server On Raspbian Stretch - June 17, 2019
Their NYC is good!
Test file in NYC not working:
# wget http://69.162.169.197/100mb.dat
–2013-02-12 17:57:48– http://69.162.169.197/100mb.dat
Connecting to 69.162.169.197:80… failed: Connection refused.
My apologies, this has been corrected.
Working now however cannot get better than 11.1M/s. Server has only a 100Mbps interface. Correct ?
That is correct.
Latency from Rapidswitch UK to Steadfast is even better than too Choopa:
# ping -c 100 69.162.169.197
PING 69.162.169.197 (69.162.169.197) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 69.162.169.197: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=68.9 ms
[…]
64 bytes from 69.162.169.197: icmp_seq=100 ttl=55 time=69.1 ms
— 69.162.169.197 ping statistics —
100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 99190ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 68.747/69.165/77.657/1.087 ms
# traceroute 69.162.169.197
traceroute to 69.162.169.197 (69.162.169.197), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 87.117.226.2 (87.117.226.2) 0.039 ms 0.010 ms 0.008 ms
2 87.117.211.37 (87.117.211.37) 0.294 ms 0.295 ms 0.289 ms
3 593.core1.thn.as20860.net (62.233.127.173) 1.159 ms 1.182 ms 1.177 ms
4 xe-7-3-1.londra32.lon.seabone.net (89.221.43.105) 1.135 ms 1.130 ms 1.126 ms
5 xe-1-0-4.ar1.lhr1.uk.nlayer.net (69.22.139.53) 4.393 ms 4.401 ms 4.800 ms
6 ae2-70g.cr1.lhr1.uk.nlayer.net (69.22.139.62) 1.083 ms 30.922 ms 1.111 ms
7 xe-11-3-1.cr1.nyc3.us.nlayer.net (69.22.142.132) 68.662 ms 68.835 ms 68.819 ms
8 as32748.xe-10-0-1-142.cr1.nyc3.us.nlayer.net (69.31.95.62) 69.559 ms 69.560 ms 69.553 ms
9 ip26.67-202-117.static.steadfastdns.net (67.202.117.26) 70.963 ms 71.123 ms 71.388 ms
10 ip197.69-162-169.static.steadfastdns.net (69.162.169.197) 69.343 ms 69.340 ms 69.322 ms
First I see a transatlantic latency below 70ms. Too bad IPv6 is not available in Steadfast :-(
I signed up with Kazila back in March 2011, so next month it will be 2 years of service. Still very happy. My 512MB Xen VPS is at their New York location.
Thank you David! We’re very happy to hear this and we really appreciate your continued business.
@nate Just checked at http://steadfast.net/corporate/lookingglass.php and Steadfast NYC does have IPv6 connectivity:
Tracing route to ipv6.google.com via IPv6 from New York…
traceroute to ipv6.google.com (2607:f8b0:4003:c01::68), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets
1 2607:f128:400:1:ffff::2 (2607:f128:400:1:ffff::2) 2.299 ms 2.528 ms 2.768 ms
2 2607:f128:403:5::1 (2607:f128:403:5::1) 0.563 ms 0.644 ms 0.684 ms
3 2607:f128:403:6::1 (2607:f128:403:6::1) 35.269 ms 35.359 ms 35.449 ms
4 core1-0-2-0.lga.net.google.com (2001:504:1::a501:5169:1) 22.005 ms 21.998 ms 21.990 ms
5 2001:4860::1:0:3be (2001:4860::1:0:3be) 23.022 ms 23.008 ms 2001:4860::1:0:755 (2001:4860::1:0:755) 138.810 ms
6 2001:4860::8:0:4397 (2001:4860::8:0:4397) 21.943 ms 2001:4860::8:0:4398 (2001:4860::8:0:4398) 22.431 ms 22.091 ms
7 2001:4860::8:0:3cd9 (2001:4860::8:0:3cd9) 6.965 ms 2001:4860::8:0:3cda (2001:4860::8:0:3cda) 6.541 ms 6.625 ms
8 2001:4860::8:0:3569 (2001:4860::8:0:3569) 13.652 ms 2001:4860::8:0:3005 (2001:4860::8:0:3005) 14.691 ms 2001:4860::8:0:3569 (2001:4860::8:0:3569) 13.636 ms
9 2001:4860::8:0:2f03 (2001:4860::8:0:2f03) 28.344 ms 28.436 ms 28.426 ms
10 2001:4860::8:0:29ee (2001:4860::8:0:29ee) 53.878 ms 53.859 ms 53.854 ms
11 2001:4860::2:0:95e (2001:4860::2:0:95e) 53.643 ms 2001:4860::2:0:95d (2001:4860::2:0:95d) 53.650 ms 53.602 ms
12 ob-in-x68.1e100.net (2607:f8b0:4003:c01::68) 53.305 ms 53.290 ms 53.391 ms
Trace complete.
So any chance to get IPv6 connectivity on your VPSes ?
Steadfast does indeed have IPv6 connectivity. We’ve even been allocated blocks of IPv6, it just hasn’t been implemented on our end. I can’t promise anything but I’ll work on this and hopefully make IPv6 available upon request within the coming days. I’ll definitely keep you posted.
Wondering how Kazila is doing? Check its uptime and performance: http://z1s.org/dashboard/checks/511a8c063bfc0a54500293d7 (New York) – http://z1s.org/dashboard/checks/511a8c153bfc0a5450029425 (Dallas) – http://z1s.org/dashboard/checks/511a8c2c3bfc0a54500294d4 (Los Angeles) and their homepage: http://z1s.org/dashboard/checks/511a8c7b3bfc0a5450029703
Spamming EVERYWHERE?
Do you have WINDOWS VPS or support installing via Custom ISO? I have licenses.
No custom ISO support at this time, however we have Windows Server 2008 R2 x86-64 / Windows Server 2012 x86-64 templates available. You will need to supply your own license. If you’re interested, just sign-up as you normally would selecting any OS and open a ticket after purchasing.
Everything is good except bandwidth addon. It’s too expensive.
tdcadm – Thank you for the feedback. Everyone’s bandwidth requirements are different so our bandwidth pricing will always be negotiable. If a customer ever needed extra bandwidth or went over their allocated bandwidth, we would most certainly work with them on the price. We’re not here to grill anyone with crazy overages. Our pricing will always be reasonable, competitive and similar to the market price within that particular location. That being said, if you need much more bandwidth feel free to contact our sales department for a more accurate quote.