Hosting Websites on Bare Minimum VPS/Dedicated Servers

SparkVPS – High Bandwidth KVM VPS! 2GB SSD KVM VPS with 5TB Bandwidth for $25/year and more in Dallas and New York (Free Month Offer)

Tags: , , , , , , , , Date/Time: April 10, 2019 @ 5:00 pm, by Frank Williams

Dylan from SparkVPS wrote in to share their new Spring specials with the community. We thought the offers looked pretty attractive for a KVM offer, so here it is. We have been told that everything here is powered by PURE SSD’s for maximum performance.

They’ve received positive reviews to their previous offers on here, and we hope you enjoy what they have to offer to you today! As always – we want to hear your feedback, so if you decide to buy one – please be sure to comment below!

Their WHOIS is public, and you can find their ToS/Legal Docs here. We have been informed that they are now accepting payments via Alipay. Additionally, they accept PayPal, Credit Cards, Debit Cards, and Cryptocurrency (Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, Monero, Bitcoin Cash) as available payment methods.

Here’s what they had to say:

“SparkVPS is a faster-than-SSD VPS provider. Here at SparkVPS, we specialize in providing VPS hosting. We are able to deliver unparalleled performance in the industry via our proprietary technology, which we call “MaxIO”, combined with our optimized local RAID-10 pure SSD access storage allows us to deliver VPS hosting that is twice as fast as traditional SSD VPS hosting.

Exclusive for the LowEndBox community, we have some KVM SSD VPS offers, which support Docker, Custom Kernel Builds, and so much more!”

Here’s the offers:

****
Order any special below and get a 1 month free service extension. After your order has been completed, open a support ticket with our billing department and mention this post to claim your free month extension!
****

2GB RAM SSD KVM VPS

  • 2 CPU Cores
  • 2048MB RAM
  • 25GB SSD Storage
  • 5000GB Bandwidth
  • 1Gbps
  • KVM/SolusVM
  • Root Access Included
  • Docker, Kubernetes, ServerPilot, Custom Kernels, Custom OS 100% Supported!
  • $25/yr
  • [ORDER]

4GB RAM SSD KVM VPS

  • 4 CPU Cores
  • 4096MB RAM
  • 50GB SSD Storage
  • 15000GB Bandwidth
  • 1Gbps
  • KVM/SolusVM
  • Root Access Included
  • Docker, Kubernetes, ServerPilot, Custom Kernels, Custom OS 100% Supported!
  • $55/yr
  • [ORDER]

6GB RAM SSD KVM VPS

  • 6 CPU Cores
  • 6144MB RAM
  • 80GB SSD Storage
  • 20000GB Bandwidth
  • 1Gbps
  • KVM/SolusVM
  • Root Access Included
  • Docker, Kubernetes, ServerPilot, Custom Kernels, Custom OS 100% Supported!
  • $90/yr
  • [ORDER]

NETWORK INFO:

Dallas, TX, USA
Test IPv4: 192.3.237.150
Test file: http://192.3.237.150/1000MB.test

Buffalo, NY, USA
Test IPv4: 192.3.180.103
Test file: http://192.3.180.103/1000MB.test


KVM Host Nodes
– Intel Dual Xeon E5 Series Processors
– 128GB DDR3 RAM
– Samsung Enterprise SSD’s
– Dual/Redundant Power Supply
– 1Gbps Network Uplink

Please let us know if you have any questions/comments and enjoy!

12 Comments

  1. It’s very cheap,i wonder how to do this price.I want to learn,someone can answer me?

    April 10, 2019 @ 9:28 pm | Reply
  2. I would not recommend anybody buy from these people, I purchased one of their 10 vps specials a while back, the servers are absolutely useless they reboot constantly they disappear offline until you open a ticket assuming that the dashboard actually works so you can open a ticket to begin with, don’t waste your time or money. I haven’t even been able to log in for months because I get a 500 error on there site.
    Oversold trash.

    April 11, 2019 @ 8:30 pm | Reply
  3. Alberto:

    IPv4 / IPv6? How many addresses?

    April 13, 2019 @ 9:33 am | Reply
  4. Manpreet Singh Nehra:

    Probably careful about buying, they do try to keep up, but their support is overloaded “Custom OS” is difficult to get working and the solusvm takes forever to do anything. I am guessing they are hugely overprovisioned and now the hypervisor is dead

    April 14, 2019 @ 1:08 am | Reply
  5. Love SparkVPS:

    Trash.

    Facts:

    - 90% uptime
    - 3826.44 ms average response time (that's almost 4 seconds for Nginx to say hi back)
    - it takes 15 minutes to run bench.sh
    - customer service reps have a copy paste reply for every complaint: "we have optimized our server. try again please"
    - CSR closes tickets if you insist that the service is not improved. No replies.
    
    Here's the bench.sh results, after 15 minutes:
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz
    Number of cores      : 3
    CPU frequency        : 566.833 MHz
    Total size of Disk   : 40.0 GB (5.5 GB Used)
    Total amount of Mem  : 3072 MB (252 MB Used)
    Total amount of Swap : 3072 MB (321 MB Used)
    System uptime        : 3 days, 22 hour 48 min
    Load average         : 16.30, 16.51, 14.52
    OS                   : Debian GNU/Linux 8
    Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel               : 2.6.32-042stab134.8
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I/O speed(1st run)   : 4.1 MB/s
    I/O speed(2nd run)   : 3.0 MB/s
    I/O speed(3rd run)   : 8.3 MB/s
    Average I/O speed    : 5.1 MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
    CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         5.92MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          3.24MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            4.26MB/s
    Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           1.84MB/s
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           1.65MB/s
    Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             2.15MB/s
    Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           3.36MB/s
    Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          1.83MB/s
    Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            4.74MB/s
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           1.79MB/s
    Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          1.25MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
    
    And another:
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz
    Number of cores      : 3
    CPU frequency        : 566.833 MHz
    Total size of Disk   : 40.0 GB (5.5 GB Used)
    Total amount of Mem  : 3072 MB (312 MB Used)
    Total amount of Swap : 3072 MB (272 MB Used)
    System uptime        : 3 days, 23 hour 49 min
    Load average         : 1.34, 1.77, 6.07
    OS                   : Debian GNU/Linux 8
    Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel               : 2.6.32-042stab134.8
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I/O speed(1st run)   : 9.9 MB/s
    I/O speed(2nd run)   : 16.3 MB/s
    I/O speed(3rd run)   : 5.2 MB/s
    Average I/O speed    : 10.5 MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
    CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         5.85MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          2.51MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            4.97MB/s
    Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           2.28MB/s
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           5.47MB/s
    Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             2.11MB/s
    Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           5.70MB/s
    Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          5.29MB/s
    Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            5.26MB/s
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           4.16MB/s
    Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          4.49MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    

    These servers are worse than your raspberry pi on a 128mb SDCard from 1999, in your grandmother’s closet, using her DSL connection.

    Have money to throw away or you’re a complete moron? Spend it on SparkVPS.

    April 15, 2019 @ 11:46 pm | Reply
  6. Trish:

    Terrible service, servers are way overloaded not worth a penny.

    April 18, 2019 @ 8:10 am | Reply
  7. Muthanna Muslet:

    Terrible Service. Total Garbage. I raised multiple tickets and their Anthony Bradshaw guy responds with 4 word sentences every day. They cancelled my subscription and no refund yet.

    Garbage!!!

    April 18, 2019 @ 11:48 am | Reply
    • Georgio:

      You just described my experience with them!

      April 25, 2019 @ 5:44 am | Reply
  8. Terry:

    Really suprised to see all this negative comment here about Sparkvps, because my experience after grabing a 2GB 2 core KVM on the 11th April 2019 for $25 USD has been very positive. If they have been over provisioned in the past I have seen no evidence of that yet. Uptime is good, availability is good, I run BOINC and an ftp server, I’m scoring some good points per hour on BOINC. I can really see the difference that SSD makes compared with my other servers with DigitalOcean or Chicagovps/123systems.
    If they have been ‘Bad’ in the past, I hope they have ‘cleaned up their act’, much like chicagovps/123systems have. After 10 days I score them 8//10.

    April 19, 2019 @ 9:17 am | Reply
    • Georgio:

      Ha-ha! Nice try, but still nooooooooooooooooooo

      April 25, 2019 @ 5:46 am | Reply
  9. Georgio:

    Totally unreliable. I didn’t see uptime more than a week ever!
    Tech support just talking head
    Don’t waste your time and money

    April 25, 2019 @ 5:41 am | Reply

Leave a Reply

Some notes on commenting on LowEndBox:

  • Do not use LowEndBox for support issues. Go to your hosting provider and issue a ticket there. Coming here saying "my VPS is down, what do I do?!" will only have your comments removed.
  • Akismet is used for spam detection. Quoting webhostingtalk.com URL seems to get binned consistently here, but I do peek into the spam box frequently to publish those comments.
  • Use <pre>...</pre> to quote the output from your terminal/console, or consider using a pastebin service.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *