LowEndTalk community member @treesmokah (great nick) shared news of a terrifying development:
ICANN, the organization that regulates global domain name policy, and Verisign, the abusive monopolist that operates the .COM and .NET top-level domains, have quietly proposed enormous changes to global domain name policy in their recently published “Proposed Renewal of the Registry Agreement for .NET”, which is now open for public comment.
Either by design, or unintentionally, they’ve proposed allowing any government in the world to cancel, redirect, or transfer to their control applicable domain names! This is an outrageous and dangerous proposal that must be stopped. While this proposal is currently only for .NET domain names, presumably they would want to also apply it to other extensions like .COM as those contracts come up for renewal.
Um, wait…what?!?
Indeed, the new proposal says:
Verisign reserves the right to deny, cancel, redirect, or transfer any registration or transaction, or place any domain names on registry lock, hold or similar status, as it deems necessary, in its unlimited and sole discretion…to ensure compliance with applicable law, government rules or regulations, or pursuant to any legal order or subpoena of any government, administrative, or government authority, or court of competent jurisdiction…
Terrifying.
Related Posts:
Looking for a Cheap Domain and Don't Care About the TLD?
The Five Videos Blowing Up Our Analytics on LowEndBoxTV
.net Domain Registrations: As Cheap as $1.88!
eWallhost: August Sale on .com Domains That Might Just Undercut the Competition
Five Reasons Why LowEndTalk is the Best Place to Sell Your Domain
Get a FREE .pro Domain from Porkbun!
- Did You Miss LowEndBox’s SuperBowl Ad? - February 9, 2025
- Our Cheap GPU Directory is Now Live!Nvidia GPUs for AI, Training LLM Models, and More! - February 9, 2025
- SoftShellWeb: Special Offer on China-Optimized Network VPS, Plus Deals in Taipei, Taiwan and Salt Lake City - February 8, 2025
WOW. Disturbing news to say the least. I see a huge opening for abuse if the “monopolist commies” change the rules.
Somebody didn’t think this through. The idea was probably to quickly allow seizing of domains used for scamming, ransomware, terrorist, and other illegal activities. Typical political ideas that sound good on the surface. But nobody investigated what this could actually mean without any safeguards in place. Sigh.